Abstract
Data visualization aids have become popular tools to assist managerial decision making in marketing. For example, Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are often used to identify suitable retail locations, regional distributions for advertising campaigns, or targeting of direct marketing activities. GIS-based visualizations facilitate the assessment of store locations and help planners to select the most promising options. The selection of the best alternative requires a “visual optimization” which is typically supported by GIS–thematic maps. In an online experiment, we investigate the way how different GIS-based data representations influence marketing analysts’ decision making styles. Our results show that GIS-maps are a relevant part of the task environment and that the type of map visualization influences the activated decision processes. The invoked decision process is also shown to depend on the way symbol overload is handled by GIS-maps. We further find that analysts’ decision processes vary under time pressure and also relate to personal characteristics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Benbasat, I./Dexter, A. S. (1985): An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation. Management Science, Vol. 31, 11, pp. 1348–1364.
Bertin, J. (1983): Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams, Networks, Maps. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bettman J. R./Kakkar, P. (1977): Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 3, 3, pp. 233–240.
Bettman J. R./Zins, M. A. (1979): Information Format and Choice Task Effects in Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 6, 9, pp. 141–153.
Biehal, B./Chakravarti, D. (1982): Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers’ Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes. Journal Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 3, pp. 431–441.
Cleveland, W. S./McGill, R. (1984): Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 79, 387, pp. 531–554.
Cornelius, B./Wagner, U./Natter, M. (2010): Managerial Applicability of Graphical Formats to Support Positioning Decisions. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 60, 3, pp. 167–201.
Czerlinski,J./Gigerenzer, G./Goldstein,D. G. (1999): How good are simple heuristics? In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 97–118). New York: Oxford University Press.
DeSanctis, G. (1984): Computer Graphics as Decision Aids: Direction for Research. Decision Science, Vol. 5, 4, pp. 463–487.
Dickson, G. W./DeSanctics, G./McBride D. J. (1986): Understanding the Effectiveness ofcomputer Graphics for Decision Support: A Cumulative Experimental Approach. Cornm. ACM, Vol. 29, 1, pp. 40–47.
Einstein, G. O./Hunt, R. R. 1980: Levels of Processing and Organization: Additive Effects of Individual- Item and Relational Processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, Vol. 6, pp. 588–598.
Ekstrom, R. B./French, J.W./Harmann, H. H. (1976): Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, N.J: Educational Testing Service.
Etizioni, A. (1989): Humble Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, pp. 122–125.
Gigerenzer, G./Hoffrage, U./Kleinbolting, H. (1991): Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, Vol. 98, pp. 506–528.
Gigerenzer, G./Goldstein,D. G. (1996): Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, Vol. 103, pp. 650–669.
Gigerenzer, G./Selten, R. (2001): Rethinking rationality. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 1–13). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldstein, D. A./Gigerenzer,G./Hogarth, R. M./Kacelnik,A./Kareev,Y./Klein, G./Martignon, L./Payne,J. W./Schlag,K. H. (2001): Group report: Why and when do simple heuristics work?. In G. Gigerenzer & R. Selten (Eds.), Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox (pp. 173–190). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldstein, D. G./Gigerenzer,G. (2002): Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, Vol. 109, pp. 75–90.
Golledge, R. G./Stimson, R. J. (1997): Spatial Behavior: A Geographical Perspective. NY: The Guilford Press.
Hayes, J. R./Simon, H. A. (1977): Psychological Differences Among Problem Isomorphs. In D. B. Pisoni & G. R. Potts (Ed), Cognitive theory. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoch, S. J./Schkade D.A. (1996): A Psychological Approach to Decision Support Systems. Management Science, Vol. 42, 1, pp. 51–64.
Hutchinson, J. W./Alba, J.W./Eisenstein, E.M. (2010): Heuristics and Biases in Data-Based Decision Making: Effects of Experience, Training, and Graphical Data Displays. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 47, 4, pp. 627–642.
Jarvenpaa, S. (1989): The Effect of Task Demands and Graphical Format on Information Processing Strategies. Management Science, 35(3), pp. 285–303.
Jank, W./Kannan, P. K. (2005): Understanding Geographical Markets of Online Firms Using Spatial Models of Customer Choice. Marketing Science, Vol. 24, 4, pp. 623–634.
Leeflang, P.S.H./Wittink, D. R. (2000): Building models for marketing decisions: Past, present and future. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 17, 2-3, pp. 105–126.
Lucas, H. C./Nielsen, N. R. (1980): The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance. Management Science, Vol. 26, 10, pp. 982–993.
Meyers-Levy, J. (1988): Influence of Sex Roles on Judgment. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14, pp. 522–530.
Natter, M./Mild, A./Wagner, U./Taudes, A. (2008): Planning new tariffs at tele.ring – the application and impact of an integrated segmentation, targeting and positioning tool. Marketing Science, Vol. 27, July-August, pp. 600–609.
Newell, B. R./Shanks D. R. (2003): Take the Best or Look at the Rest? Factors Influencing ‘One- Reason’ Decision Making,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, Vol. 29, 1, pp. 53–65.
Newell, B. R./Weston, N. J./Shanks, D. R. (2003): Empirical Tests of a Fast-and-Frugal Heuristic: Not Everyone ‘Takes-the-Best. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, Vol. 91, 1, pp. 82–96.
Ozimec, A.-M./Natter, M./Reutterer, T. (2010): GIS-Based Marketing Decisions: Effects of Alternative Visualizations on Decision Quality. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 74, 6, pp. 94–110.
Painton, S./Gentry, J. W. (1985): Another Look at the Impact of Information Presentation. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, 9, pp. 240–244.
Parker, P. (2004): Google Focuses Local Ad Targeting. ClickZ, April 15. Available as http://www.clickz.com.
Payne, J. W./Bettman, J. R./Johnson E. J. (1993): The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rieskamp, J./Hoffrage, U. (1999): When Do People Use Simple Heuristics and How Can We Tell? In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, Gerd Gigerenzer, Peter M. Todd, and The ABC Research Group, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–68.
Simon, H. A. (1956): Rational choice and the structure of environments. Psychological Review, Vol. 63, pp. 129–138.
Steenburgh, T. J./Ainslie, A./Engebretson, P. H. (2003): Massively Categorical Variables: Revealing the Information in ZIP Codes. Marketing Science, Vol. 22, 1, pp. 40–57.
Ter Hofstede, F./Wedel, M./Steenkamp, J. E. M. (2002): Indentifying Spatial Segments in International Markets. Marketing Science, Vol. 21, 2, pp. 160–177.
Tversky, A. (1969): Elimination by Aspect: A Theory of Choice. Psychological Review, Vol. 79, pp. 281–299.
Tyner, J. (1992): Introduction to Thematic Cartography. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Vessey, I. (1991): Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature. Decision Sciences, Vol. 22, 2, pp. 219–240.
Van Bruggen, G. H./Smidts, A./Wierenga, B. (1998): Improving Decision Making by Means of a Marketing Decision Support System. Management Science, Vol. 44, 5, pp. 645–658.
Wertheimer, M. (1923): Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II. Ín Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350. Translation published in Ellis, Willis, D. (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71–88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [available at http://psy.ed.asu.edu/~classics/Wertheimer/Forms/forms.htm]
Wierenga, B./Van Bruggen, G. H. (2000): Marketing Management Support Systems. Principles, Tools and Implementation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wierenga, B. (2011): Mangerial decision making in marketing: The next research frontier. International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 28, 2, pp. 89–101.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994): Visual search in continuous, naturalistic stimuli. Vision Research, Vol. 34, pp. 1187–1195.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ozimec, AM., Natter, M., Reutterer, T. (2012). Visual Decision Making Styles and Geographical Information Systems. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3060-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-3722-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)