Abstract
Hierarchical models have become a workhorse tool in applied marketing research, particularly in the context of conjoint choice experiments. The industry has been pushing for ever more complex studies and 50+ random effects in a study are very common today. At the same time, respondent time and motivation is scarce as ever. Consequently, inference about high dimensional random effects critically depends on efficient pooling of information across respondents. In this paper we show how restrictions on the functional form of effects translate into more efficient pooling of information across respondents, compared to flexible functional forms achieved through categorical coding. We develop our argument contrasting the most restrictive functional form, i.e. linearity to categorical coding and then generalize to simple ordinal constraints. We close with suggestions on how to improve the pooling of information when definite functional form assumptions cannot be justified a priori, for example in studies that measure preferences over large sets of brands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature
Albert, J. H./Chib, S. (2001): Sequential Ordinal Modelling with Applications to Survival Data, in: Biometrics Vol. 57, 3, pp. 829-836.
Allenby, G. M./Arora, N./Ginter, J. L. (1995): Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Design and Analysis of Conjoint Studies, in: Journal of Marketing Research Vol 32, 2, pp. 152-162.
Allenby, G. M./Rossi, P.E. (1998): Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity, in: Journal of Econometrics Vol. 89, 1-2, pp. 57–78.
Armstrong, B./Sloan, M. (1989): Ordinal Regression Models for Epidemiologic Data, in: American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, 1, pp. 191–204.
Cox, C. (1995): Location-scale Cumulative Odds Models for Ordinal Data: A Generalized Nonlinear Model Approach, in: Statistics in Medicine Vol. 14, 11, pp. 1191–1203.
Elrod, T./Häubl, G./Tipps, S. (2012): Parsimonious Structural Equation Models for Repeated Measures Data, With Applications to the Study of Consumer Preferences, in: Psychometrika, forthcoming.
Gertheiss, J./Tutz, G. (2009): Penalized Regression with Ordinal Predictors, in: International Statistical Review Vol. 77, 3, pp. 345–365.
Frühwirth-Schnatter, S./Tüchler, R. (2008): Bayesian Parsimonious Covariance Estimation for Hierarchical Linear Mixed Models, in: Statistics and Computing Vol. 18, 1, pp. 1–13.
Hardy, M. A. (1993): Regression with Dummy Variables. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–093, Sage, Newbury Park.
Hastings, W. K. (1970): Monte Carlo Sampling Methods using Markov Chains and Their Applications, in: Biometrika Vol. 57, 1, pp. 97–109.
Johnson, R. (1999): The Joys and Sorrows of Implementing HB Methods for Conjoint Analysis, in: Johnson R. Research Paper Series, (Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc.).
Labowitz, S. (1970): The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 35, 3, pp. 515–524.
Lenk, P. J./DeSarbo, W. S./Green, P. E./Young, M. R. (1996): Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental designs, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 15, 2, pp. 173–191.
Mayer, L. S. (1970): Comment on ‘the Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories’”, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 36, 3, pp. 916–917.
Mayer, L. S. (1971): A Note on Treating Ordinal Data as Interval Data, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 36, 3, pp. 519–520.
McCullagh, P. (1980): Regression Model for Ordinal Data, in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, Vol. 42, 2, pp. 109–127.
Myung, J. I./Karabatsos, G./Iverson, G.J. (2005): A Bayesian Approach to Testing Decision Making Axioms, in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 49, 3, pp. 205–225.
Peterson, B./Harrell, F. E. (1990): Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables, in: Applied Statistics Vol. 39, 2, pp. 205–217.
Rossi, P. E./Allenby, G./McCulloch, R. (2005): Bayesian Statistics and Marketing - Repr. - Chichester: Wiley.
Srinivasan, V./Shocker, A. D. (1973): Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferences, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 38, 3, pp. 337–369.
Walter, S. D./Feinstein, A. R./Wells, C. K. (1987): Coding Ordinal Independent Variables in Multiple Regression Analysis, in: American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, 2, pp. 319–323.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Otter, T., Kosyakova, T. (2012). Implications of Linear Versus Dummy Coding for Pooling of Information in Hierarchical Models. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-8349-3060-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-8349-3722-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)