Skip to main content

Implications of Linear Versus Dummy Coding for Pooling of Information in Hierarchical Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management

Abstract

Hierarchical models have become a workhorse tool in applied marketing research, particularly in the context of conjoint choice experiments. The industry has been pushing for ever more complex studies and 50+ random effects in a study are very common today. At the same time, respondent time and motivation is scarce as ever. Consequently, inference about high dimensional random effects critically depends on efficient pooling of information across respondents. In this paper we show how restrictions on the functional form of effects translate into more efficient pooling of information across respondents, compared to flexible functional forms achieved through categorical coding. We develop our argument contrasting the most restrictive functional form, i.e. linearity to categorical coding and then generalize to simple ordinal constraints. We close with suggestions on how to improve the pooling of information when definite functional form assumptions cannot be justified a priori, for example in studies that measure preferences over large sets of brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Albert, J. H./Chib, S. (2001): Sequential Ordinal Modelling with Applications to Survival Data, in: Biometrics Vol. 57, 3, pp. 829-836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allenby, G. M./Arora, N./Ginter, J. L. (1995): Incorporating Prior Knowledge into the Design and Analysis of Conjoint Studies, in: Journal of Marketing Research Vol 32, 2, pp. 152-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Allenby, G. M./Rossi, P.E. (1998): Marketing Models of Consumer Heterogeneity, in: Journal of Econometrics Vol. 89, 1-2, pp. 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Armstrong, B./Sloan, M. (1989): Ordinal Regression Models for Epidemiologic Data, in: American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, 1, pp. 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cox, C. (1995): Location-scale Cumulative Odds Models for Ordinal Data: A Generalized Nonlinear Model Approach, in: Statistics in Medicine Vol. 14, 11, pp. 1191–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elrod, T./Häubl, G./Tipps, S. (2012): Parsimonious Structural Equation Models for Repeated Measures Data, With Applications to the Study of Consumer Preferences, in: Psychometrika, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gertheiss, J./Tutz, G. (2009): Penalized Regression with Ordinal Predictors, in: International Statistical Review Vol. 77, 3, pp. 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Frühwirth-Schnatter, S./Tüchler, R. (2008): Bayesian Parsimonious Covariance Estimation for Hierarchical Linear Mixed Models, in: Statistics and Computing Vol. 18, 1, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardy, M. A. (1993): Regression with Dummy Variables. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–093, Sage, Newbury Park.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hastings, W. K. (1970): Monte Carlo Sampling Methods using Markov Chains and Their Applications, in: Biometrika Vol. 57, 1, pp. 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, R. (1999): The Joys and Sorrows of Implementing HB Methods for Conjoint Analysis, in: Johnson R. Research Paper Series, (Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Labowitz, S. (1970): The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 35, 3, pp. 515–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lenk, P. J./DeSarbo, W. S./Green, P. E./Young, M. R. (1996): Hierarchical Bayes Conjoint Analysis: Recovery of Partworth Heterogeneity from Reduced Experimental designs, in: Marketing Science, Vol. 15, 2, pp. 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayer, L. S. (1970): Comment on ‘the Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories’”, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 36, 3, pp. 916–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mayer, L. S. (1971): A Note on Treating Ordinal Data as Interval Data, in: American Sociological Review Vol. 36, 3, pp. 519–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McCullagh, P. (1980): Regression Model for Ordinal Data, in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, Vol. 42, 2, pp. 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Myung, J. I./Karabatsos, G./Iverson, G.J. (2005): A Bayesian Approach to Testing Decision Making Axioms, in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 49, 3, pp. 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson, B./Harrell, F. E. (1990): Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Response Variables, in: Applied Statistics Vol. 39, 2, pp. 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi, P. E./Allenby, G./McCulloch, R. (2005): Bayesian Statistics and Marketing - Repr. - Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srinivasan, V./Shocker, A. D. (1973): Linear Programming Techniques for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferences, in: Psychometrika, Vol. 38, 3, pp. 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Walter, S. D./Feinstein, A. R./Wells, C. K. (1987): Coding Ordinal Independent Variables in Multiple Regression Analysis, in: American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, 2, pp. 319–323.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otter, T., Kosyakova, T. (2012). Implications of Linear Versus Dummy Coding for Pooling of Information in Hierarchical Models. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics