Skip to main content

Combining Micro and Macro Data to Study Retailer Pricing in the Presence of State Dependence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Consumers of repeat-purchase goods have a higher probability of choosing products that they have purchased in the past. This form of persistence or state dependence has emerged in scanner panel data for many product categories. Considering the existence of state dependence by firms is important for the better understanding of consumer purchase behavior and pricing. If state dependence is a function of loyalty, then firms may want to engage in strategic pricing to control the evolution of preferences. However, manufacturers and retailers have limited access to scanner panel data. In addition, scanner panel data are often not suitable for use in pricing decisions because they provide price information only for those items that a consumer has purchased in a particular store and on a certain day. In this paper, we will show how firms can use readily available store-level scanner data in combination with tracking data, which firms routinely collect, to estimate the impact of state dependence on consumer purchase behavior and determine the resulting effect on the pricing decisions of firms. We model demand using a flexible, random coefficient logit model for aggregated data that takes into account the heterogeneity of brand perceptions and customer responses to pricing and promotions. This model also accounts for the possibility that competing brands exhibit flexible substitution patterns. The results indicate that consumers may change their purchase behavior if they have recently purchased a particular brand. We then use the demand side estimates on the supply side to show how retailer pricing and profitability are affected if a retailer does or does not anticipate state dependence in predicting consumer purchase behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Albuquerque, P./Bronnenberg, B. J. (2008): Market Areas of Car Dealerships.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baum, C. F./Schaffer, M. E./Stillman, S. (2002): Instrumental Variables and GMM: Estimation and Testing, Boston College Economics Working Paper 545.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berry, S. T./Levinsohn, J./Pakes, A. (1995): Automobile Prices in Market Equilibrium, Econometrica, Vol. 63, 4, pp. 841–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhat, C. R. (2000): Quasi-random Maximum Simulated Likelihood Estimation of the Mixed Logit Model, Transportation Research Part B, 35, pp. 677–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabral, L. M. B. (2000): Introduction to Industrial Organization, MIT Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chintagunta, P. K./Nair, H. S. (2011): Discrete-choice Models of Consumer Demand in Marketing.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Draganska, M./Klapper, D. (2007): Retail Environment and Manufacturer Competitive Intensity, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 83, 2, pp. 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dubé, J.-P./Hitsch, G. J./Rossi, P. E. (2010): State Dependence and Alternative Explanations for Consumer Inertia, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 41, 3, pp. 417–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubé, J.-P./Hitsch, G. J./Rossi, P. E./Vitorino, M. A. (2008): Category Pricing with State-dependent Utility, Marketing Science, Vol. 27, 3, pp. 417–429.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Einav, L./Leitag, E./Nevo, A. (2010): Recording Discrepancies in Nielsen Homescan Data, Are they present and do they matter?, Quantitative Marketing and Economics, Vol. 8, 2, pp. 207–239. 25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erdem, T./Keane, M. P. (1996): Decision-making under Uncertainty: Capturing Dynamic Brand Choice Processes in turbulent Consumer Goods Markets, Marketing Science, Vol. 15, 1, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fader, P. S. (1993): Integrating the Dirichlet-multinomial and Multinomial Logit Models of Brand Choice, Marketing Letters, Vol. 4, 2, pp. 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farrell, J./Klemperer, P. (2007): Chapter 31 Coordination and Lock-in: Competition with Switching Costs and Network Effects, Vol. 3 of Handbook of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, pp. 1967–2072.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Frank, R. E. (1962): Brand Choice as a Probability Process, The Journal of Business, Vol. 35, 1, pp. 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gowrisankaran, G./Rysman, M. (2009): Dynamics of Consumer Demand for New Durable Goods. Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Greene, W. H. (2003): Econometric analysis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guadagni, P. M./Little, J. D. C. (1983): A Logit Model of Brand Choice Calibrated on Scanner Data, Marketing Science, Vol. 2, 3, pp. 203–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansen, L. (1982): Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators, Econometrica, Vol. 50, 3, pp. 1029–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hausman, J. A./Taylor, W. E. (1981): Panel Data and unobservable individual Effects, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 49, 6, pp. 1377–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Horsky, D./Misra, S./Nelson, P. (2006): Observed and unobserved Preference Heterogeneity in Brand-choice Models, Marketing Science, Vol. 25, 4, pp. 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keane, M. P. (1997): Modeling Heterogeneity and State Dependence in Consumer Choice Behavior, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 15, 3, pp. 310–327.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Massy, W. F. (1966): Order and Homogeneity of Family specific Brand-switching Processes, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 3, 1, pp. 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nevo, A. (2000a): Mergers with Differentiated Products: The Case of the Ready-to-eat Cereal Industry, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 31, 3, pp. 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nevo, A. (2000b): A practitioner’s Guide to Estimation of Random Coefficients Logit Models of demand, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Vol. 9, 4, pp. 513–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nevo, A. (2001): Measuring Market Power in the Ready-to-eat Cereal Industry, Econometrica, Vol. 69, 2, pp. 307–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Newey, W. K./West, K. D. (1987): A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix, Econometrica, Vol. 55, 3, pp. 703–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rust, J. (1996): Handbook of economics - chapter 14: Numerical Dynamic Programming in Economics, in H. M. Amman, D. A. Kendrick & J. Rust (eds), Handbook of Computational Economics, Vol. 1, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 619–729.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Seetharaman, P. B./Ainslie, A./Chintagunta, P. K. (1999): Investigating Household State Dependence Effects across Categories, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36, 4, pp. 488–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sovinsky Goeree, M. (2008): Limited Information and Advertising in the U.S. Personal Computer Industry, Econometrica, Vol. 76, 5, pp. 1017–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Train, K. E. (2000). Halton Sequences for Mixed Logit, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkley 27.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Villas-Boas, J. M./Zhao, Y. (2005): Retailer, Manufacturers, and individual Customers: Modeling the Supply-side in the Ketchup Marketplace, Journal of Marketing Research 42, pp. 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Villas-Boas, S. B. (2007): Vertical Relationships between Manufacturers and Retailers: Inference with Limited Data, Review of Economic Studies 74, pp. 625–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002): Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Pata, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klapper, D., Zenetti, G. (2012). Combining Micro and Macro Data to Study Retailer Pricing in the Presence of State Dependence. In: Diamantopoulos, A., Fritz, W., Hildebrandt, L. (eds) Quantitative Marketing and Marketing Management. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3722-3_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics