Skip to main content

Abstract

Although this study provides important insights into the relationship between organizational structure and organizational ambidexterity for different firm types, the binary distinction between manufacturing and service firms denotes one important limitation. Participating firms were categorized into manufacturing and service firms based on their primary business activity. To what extent this primary business activity is related to the real ratio of manufacturing vs. service remains open. Therefore, this study may lack some generalizability with regard to the application of findings to pure manufacturing and service firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kortmann, S. (2012). Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research. In: The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Ambidexterity. Betriebswirtschaftliche Studien in forschungsintensiven Industrien. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3630-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics