Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

IQM-Reifegradmodell für die Bewertung und Verbesserung des Information Lifecycle Management Prozesses

  • Chapter
Daten- und Informationsqualität

  • 3932 Accesses

Auszug

Heutige Organisationen produzieren und speichern mehr Informationen als je zuvor. Der resultierende Informationsüberfluss, zusammen mit einem Mangel an Qualitätssicherung für das Information Lifecycle Management, führt zu einem unsicheren Status der Informationsqualität in vielen Organisationen. Weiterhin hat sich herausgestellt, dass das Bewerten, Verbessern und Steuern der Informationsqualität ein offenkundig schwieriges Unterfangen ist. Dieses Kapitel stellt ein Modell zur Bewertung und Verbesserung der Information Quality Management Capability Maturity (IQM-Reifegrad) vor. Es wird ein Satz von Kriterien vorgestellt, der aus Literaturrecherche und Fallstudien abgeleitet wurde. Die Reifegradindikatoren werden validiert und in einem mehrstufigen Reifegradmodell durch eine Delphi-Studie gruppiert. Das abgeleitete IQM-Reifegradmodell hilft Organisationen ihre bestehenden Praktiken im IQM zu bewerten und potentielle Lücken und Verbesserungsstrategien zu ermitteln.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Agarwal, R. & Venkatesh, V.: Assessing a firm’s web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. In: Information Systems Research, 2. Jg., 2002, Heft 13, S. 168–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Avery, J.: Information Theory and Evolution. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballou, D. P. & Pazer, H. L.: Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems. In: Management Science, 3. Jg., 1985, Heft 31, S. 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bardecki, M. J.: Participants’ Response to the Delphi Method: An Attitudinal Perspective. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3. Jg., 1984, Heft 25, S. 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baškarada, S., Koronios, A. & Gao, J.: Towards a Capability Maturity Model for Information Quality Management: A TDQM Approach. In: 11th International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-06), 2006, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, November 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benarie, M.: Delphi and Delphi Like Approaches with Special Regards to Environmental Standard Setting. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2. Jg., 1988, Heft 33, S. 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caballero, I., Gómez, Ó. & Piattini, M.: Getting Better Information Quality by Assessing and Improving Information Quality Management. In: The Ninth International Conference on Information Quality (ICIQ-04), 2004, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cho, Y. Y., Jeong, G. H. & Kim, S. H.: A Delphi Technology Forecasting Approach Using a Semi-Markov Concept. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 40, S. 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. CMMI: Capability Maturity Model® Integration (CMMI), Version 1.1. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crosby, P.: Quality is Free. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalkey, N. C.: Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion. The Rand Corporation, Chicago, IL, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Day, G. S. & Aaker, D. A.: Marketing Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Deitz, T.: Methods for Analysing Data from Delphi Panels. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1987, Heft 31, S. 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delbecq, A. L., Ven, A. H. V. d. & Gustafson, D. H.: Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group Delphi Process. Scott-Foresman, Glenview, IL, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. DeLoe, R. C.: Explorig Complex Policy Questions Using The Policy Delphi: A Multi-Round, Interactive Survey Method. In: Applied Geography, 1. Jg., 1995, Heft 15, S. 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deming, W. E.: Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. English, L. P.: Improving Data Warehouse and Business Information Quality. Wiley Computer Publishing, New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feigenbaum, A. V.: Total Quality Control. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fontana, A. & Frey, J. H.: Interviewing: The Art of Science. Sage, London, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fowles, J.: Handbook of Futures Research. Greenwood Press, London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Giannoccaro, A., Shanks, G. & Darke, P.: Stakeholder Perceptions of Data Quality in a Data Warehouse Environment. In: Australian Computer Journal, 4. Jg., 1999, Heft 31, S. 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ishikawa, K.: Guide to Quality Control. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Juran, J. M.: Quality Control Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY,, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Juran, J. M.: Juran on Planing for Quality. Free Press, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kaynak, E. & Macaulay, J. A.: The Delphi Technique in the Measurement of Tourism Marketing Potential. In: Tourism Management, Jg., 1984, Heft, S. 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Keeney, S., Hasson, F. & McKenna, H. P.: A Critical Review of the Delphi Technique as a Research Methodology for Nursing. In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, Jg., 2001, Heft 38, S. 195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kyung-seok, R.: A study on data quality management maturity model. In: Advanced Communication Technology, 2005, ICACT 2005. The 7th International Conference on Advanced Communications Technology, 2005, S. 598–603 Vol. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Logan, D. & Newman, D.: From IM to EIM: An Adoption Model. Gartner Research, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  29. <http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/how-much-info-2003> (Zugriff am 25th of August 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Martino, J. P.: Technological Forecasting for Decision Making. American Elsevier, New York, NY, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  31. McEliece, R. J.: The Theory of Information and Coding. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Miller, M. M.: Enhancing Regional Analysis with the Delphi Method. In: Review of Regional Studies, 2. Jg., 1993, Heft 23, S. 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell, V. M. & McGoldrick, P. J.: The Role of Geodemographics in Segmenting and Targeting Consumer Markets: A Delphi Study. In: European Journal of Marketing, Jg., 1994, Heft 28, S. 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Motwani, J.: Measuring Critical Factors of TQM. In: Measuring Business Excellence, 2. Jg., 2001, Heft 5, S. 27–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paliwoda, S. J.: Predicting the Future using Delphi. In: Management Decision, 1. Jg., 1983, Heft 21, S. 31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Parente, F. J., Anderson, J. K., Myers, P. & O’Brin, T.: An Examination of Factors Contributing to Delphi Accuracy. In: Journal of Forecasting, 2. Jg., 1984, Heft 3, S. 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Parke, H. W. & Wormell, D. E. W.: The Delphi Oracle. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B. & Weber, C. V.: Capability Maturity Model for Software, Version 1.1. Software Engineering Institute/Carnegie Mellon University, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Prendergast, G. & Marr, N.: Towards a Branchless Banking Society? In: International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2. Jg., 1994, Heft 22, S. 18–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Radice, R. A., Harding, J. T., Munnis, P. E. & R.W. Phillips: A Programming Process Study. In: IBM Systems Journal, 2. Jg., 1985, Heft 24, S. 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rowe, G. & Wright, G.: The Delphi Technique as a Forecasting Tool: Issues and Analysis. In: International Journal of Forecasting, Jg., 1999, Heft 15, S. 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rowe, G., Wright, G. & Bolger, F.: Delphi: A Reevaluation of Research and Theory. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 39, S. 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Shannon, C. E.: A Mathematical Theory of Communication. In: The Bell Systems Technical Journal, Jg., 1948, Heft 27, S. 379–423, 623–656.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Shewhart, W. A.: The Application of Statistics as an Aid in Maintaining Quality of a Manufactured Product. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association, Jg., 1925, Heft 20, S. 546–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shewhart, W. A.: Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product. van Nostrand, New York, NY, 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stephenson, B. Y.: Management by Information. In: Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, 4. Jg., 1985, Heft 1, S. 26–32.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W. & Wang, R. Y.: Decision Support for Exception Handling and Quality Control in Office Operations. In: Decision Support Systems, 3. Jg., 1992, Heft 8, S. 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W. & Wang, R. Y.: Data Quality In Context. In: Communications of the ACM, 5. Jg., 1997, Heft 40, S. 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, R. Y. & Strong, D.: Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers. In: Journal of Management Information Systems, 4. Jg., 1996, Heft 12, S. 5–34.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, R. Y. A.: A Product Perspective on Total Data Quality Management. In: Communications of the ACM, 2. Jg., 1998, Heft 41, S. 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Woundenberg, F.: An Evaluation of Delphi. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Jg., 1991, Heft 40, S. 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A. & Berry, L. L.: Delivering Quality Service: Balancing Customer Perception and Expectations. Free Press, New York, NY, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department: 001-28009, WestLB AG, Herzogstraße 15, 40217, Düsseldorf

    Dr. Marcus Gebauer

Authors
  1. Saša Baškarada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. Marcus Gebauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andy Koronios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Knut Hildebrand Marcus Gebauer Holger Hinrichs Michael Mielke

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Vieweg+Teubner Verlag |GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baškarada, S., Gebauer, M., Koronios, A., Gao, J. (2008). IQM-Reifegradmodell für die Bewertung und Verbesserung des Information Lifecycle Management Prozesses. In: Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., Mielke, M. (eds) Daten- und Informationsqualität. Vieweg+Teubner. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9266-9_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation