Skip to main content

Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components?

  • Conference paper
Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty

Part of the book series: Ceramics in Orthopaedics ((CIO))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bader, R. & Willmann, G. 1999, “Keramische Pfannen für Hüftendoprothesen. Teil 6: Pfannendesign, Inklinations-und Antetorsionswinkel beeinflussen Bewegungsumfang und Impingement”, Biomedizinische Technik, vol. 44, no. 7–8, pp. 212–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Lima, D. D., Urquhart, A. G., Buehler, K. O., Walker, R. H., & Colwell, C. W., Jr. 2000, “The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios”, J Bone Joint Surg, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 315–321.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jolles, B. M., Zangger, P., & Leyvraz, P. F. Factors Presdisposing to Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Prosthesis. The Journal of Arthroplasty 17[3], 282–288. 2002.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennedy, J. G., Rogers, W. B., Soffe, K. E., Sullivan, R. J., Griffen, D. G., & Sheehan, L. J. 1998, “Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration”, J Arthroplasty, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 530–534.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Krushell, R. J., Burke, D. W., & Harris, W. H. 1991, “Range of motion in contemporary total hip arthroplasty. The impact of modular head-neck components”, J Arthroplasty, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 97–101.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lewinnek, G. E., Lewis, J. L., Tarr, R. R., Compere, C. L., & Zimmermann, J. R. 1978, “Dislocation after Total Hip-Replacement Arthroplasties”, J Bone Joint Surg Am, vol. 60-A, no. 2, pp. 217–220.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Widmer, K. H. & Zurfluh, B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 22, 815–821. 2004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Widmer, K. H., Majewski, M. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005 Aug; 20(7):723–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshimine, F. & Ginbayashi, X. A Mathematical Formula to Calculate the Theoretical Range of Motion for Total Hip Replacement. J Biomech 35, 989–993. 2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Steinkopff Verlag, Darmstadt

About this paper

Cite this paper

Widmer, K.H. (2006). Is there really a “safe zone” for the placement of total hip components?. In: Benazzo, F., Falez, F., Dietrich, M. (eds) Bioceramics and Alternative Bearings in Joint Arthroplasty. Ceramics in Orthopaedics. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1635-9_38

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1634-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1635-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics