Skip to main content

Dialysemethoden

  • Chapter
Dialyseshunts
  • 1290 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Mit zunehmender technischer Lösung von Gefäßzugangsproblemen, Antikoagulation, Effizienz und Biokompatibilität der Dialysatoren ist die Hämodialyse in den letzten 45 Jahren zu einem ausgereiften, sicheren und auch für alte und schwerkranke Patienten gut verträglichen Verfahren geworden [4]. Es gibt heute in Europa etwa 600–1000, in den USA 1400 chronische Hämodialysepatienten pro Million Einwohner [14]. Eine Hämodialysebehandlung dauert in Abhängigkeit von Restnierenfunktion und Gewicht des Patienten sowie Höhe der Retentionswerte 4 bis 6 Stunden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bergström J (1995) Nutrition and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1329–1341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Amico G (1993) Comparability of the different registries on renal replacement therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 25:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman HI, Held PJ, Hutchinson JT, Stoiber E, Hartigan MF, Berlin JA (1993) Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity in the united states. Kidney Int 43:1091–1091

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Franz HE (1996) Blutreinigungsverfahren. 5. Aufl. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hakim RM, Lazarus JM (1995) Initiation of Dialysis. J Am Soc Nephro 6:1319–1328

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hakim RM, Wingard RL, Parker RA (1994) Effect of the dialysis membrane in the treatment of patients with acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 344:1338–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hakim RM, Breyer J, Ismali N, Schulmann G (1995) Effects of dose of dialysis on morbidity and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 23:661–669

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keller F, Loewe HJ, Bauknecht K, Schwarz A, Offermann G (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. Dtsch Med Wschr 113:332–336

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowrie EG (1994) Chronic dialysis treatment: Clinical outcome and related processes of care. Am J Kidney Dis 24:255–266

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Prischl FC, Wallner M, Berent R, Lenglinger F, Kramar R (1995) Urokinase-Lyse von thrombotisch verschlossenen zentralvenösen Kathetern zur Aufrechterhaltung der Katheterfunktion bei Hämodialysepatienten. Nieren-und Hochdrukkrankheiten 24:319–232

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owen CH, Cummings RS, Sell TL, Schwab SJ, Jones RH, Glower DD (1994) Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Ann Thorac Surg 58:1729–1733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schiffl H, Lang SM, König A, Strasser T, Haider MC, Held E (1994) Biocompatible membranes in acute renal failure: prospective case-controlled study. Lancet 344: 570–572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffl H, Sitter T, Lang S, König A, Haider M, Held E (1995) Bioincompatible membranes place patients with acute renal failure at increased risk of infection ASAIOO Journal 41:M709–M712

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frei U, Schober-Halstenberg H-J (2006) Nierenersatztherapie in Deutschland 2005/2006; QUASI-Niere-Register

    Google Scholar 

  15. EBM 2008 (http://www.kbv.de/; Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung; Kapitel 40.14, S 593–596

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chauveau et al (2005) Am J Kidney Dis 45:565–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Akizawa T, Hirasawa Y, Agishi T, Matsui N (2003) Effects of argatroban as an anticoagulant for hemodialysis in patients with antithrombin III deficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:1623–1630

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Kidney Foundation (2006) KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations for anemia in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 47(5 Suppl 3):1–145

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hsu C, McCulloch CE, Curhan GC (2002) Iron Status and Hemoglobin Level in Chronic Renal Insufficiency. Am Soc Nephrol 13:2783–2786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Block GA, Spiegel DM, Ehrlich J, Mehta R et al (2005) Effects of sevelamer and calcium on coronary artery calcification in patients new to hemodialysis. Kidney Int 68:1815–1824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Block GA, Martin KJ, de Francisco AL, Turner SA, Avram MM et al (2004) Cinacalcet for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 350(15):1516–1525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. CANUSA peritoneal dialysis study group. (1996) J Am Soc Nephrol 7:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amato D, Paniagua R (2003) The Ademex study: Afterthoughts. Perit Dial Int 23:313–316

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blake PG (1997) What is the problem with high transporters? Perit Dial Int 17: 317–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake PG (2006) Peritoneal dialysis in the USA. Perit Dial Int 26:416–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Colombi A (1988) Kontinuierliche ambulante Peritonealdialyse (CAPD) und verwandte Verfahren. Enke

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cueto-Manzano AM, Rojas-Campos E (2007) Status of renal replacement therapy and peritoneal dialysis in Mexico. Perit Dial Int 27:142–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimkovic N, Oreopoulos DG (2000) Chronic peritoneal dialysis in the elderly: a review. Perit Dial Int 20:276–283

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dobbie J, Lloyd J, Gall B (1990) Categorization of ultrastructural changes in peritoneal mesothelium, stroma and blood vessels in uremia and CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 6:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  9. European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis (2005) Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:S9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M (1997) Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: A comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 30:334–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fußhöller A (2003) Automatisierte Peritonealdialyse, Heimdialysetherapie mit Zukunft. Klinikarzt 32:350–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannattasio M, Buemi M, caputo F, Viglino G, Verrina E (2003) Can peritoneal dialysis be used as long term therapy for end stage renal disease? Int Urol Nephrol 35:569–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gotch F (1991) The application of urea kinetic modeling to CAPD. In: La Greca G et al (eds) Peritoneal dialysis. Wichtig Editore Milano 47

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gotloib L, Shostack A, bar-Sella P, Cohen R (1987) Continuous mesothel injury and regeneration during long term peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Bull 7:148–155

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guo A, Mujais S (2003) Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the united states: evaluation in large incident cohorts. Kidney Int 88:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Haag-Weber M, Haug U, Wieslander A, Nabut J, Deppisch R (2003) Decline of residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients depends on uptake of carbonyl compounds from peritoneal cavity: first data of a prospective clinical trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 14:476A

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haq NU, Nolph KD (2001) Past, present, and future of quantified peritoneal dialysis. Semin Dial 14:263–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Heyka R, Schreiber M, Steinmuller D, Novik A, Streem S, Cunningham R, Vidt G (1987) Renal transplantation in patients on CAPD. Adv Perit Dial 3:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  19. Josefiak K, Arns W, Merkel F, Lange U, Nebel M (2006) Die Vorbehandlung mit Peritonealdialyse hat im Vergleich zur Hämodialyse einen positiven Einfluss auf die Frühfunktion nach Nierentransplantation. Nieren Hochdruckkrankh 35:424

    Google Scholar 

  20. Juergensen E, Wuerth D, Finkelstein SH, Juergensen PH, Bekui A, Finkelstein FO (2006) Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: patientśassessment of their satisfaction with therapy and the impact of the therapy on their lives. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Keshaviah P, Collins AJ, Ma JZ, Churchill DN, Thorpe KE: Survival comparison betweeen hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis based on matched doses of delivered therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 13(1):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  22. Khanna R, Mactier R, Twardowski Z, Nolph K (1986) Peritoneal cavity lymphatics. Perit Dial Bull 6:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kitsche B, Nebel M, Merkel F, Weber M (2006) Enteritische Peritonitis bei PD-Patienten. Nieren Hochdruckkrkh 35:42

    Google Scholar 

  24. Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Decker FW (2007) What have We learned from NECOSAD? Practical implications for peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 27:11–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kribben A, Nebel M, Herget-Rosenthal S, Philipp T (2007) Stellenwert, Indikationen und Grenzen der Peritonealdialyse. Nephrologe 2:74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lilaj T (2005) Adäquate Peritonealdialyse-neue Guidelines? Wien Klin Wochenschr 117(6):83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindholm B, Bergstrom J (1986) in Gokal R: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Churchill Livingston, pp 229–264

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lindholm B, Norbeck H (1986) Serum lipids and lipoproteins during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Acta med scand 220:143–151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Maiorca R, Vonesh E, Cavali P, De Vecchi A, Giangrande A, La Greca A, Scarpioni L, Bragantini L, Cancarini G, Cantaluppi A, Castelnovo G, Castiglioni A, Poisetti E, Viglino G (1991) A multicenter, selection-adjusted comparison of patient and technique survivals on CAPD and hemodialysis Perit Dial Int 11:118–127

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McIntyre CW (2007) Update on peritoneal dialysis solutions. Kidney Int 71:486–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mehrotra R, Burkart J (2005) Education, Research, Peritoneal Dialysis, and the north American chapter of the international society for peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 25:14–15

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Müller HP, Kühn K (2007) Bedeutung von PET und Kt/V für die Peritonealdialyse. Nephrologe 2:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nakamoto H, Kawaguchi Y, Suzuki H (2006) Is technique survival on peritoneal dialysis better in Japan? Perit Dial Int 26:136–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nebel M, Finke K (1990) CAPD in patients over 60 years of age-review from 1984–1989. Adv Perit Dial 6:56–60

    Google Scholar 

  35. Oreopoulos DG (1999) The optimisation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 55:1131–1135

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oreopoulos DG (2004) Peritoneal dialysis in the far east: an awaking giant. Perit Dial Int 24:528–530

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E, Guo A, Mujais S (2005) Health-related quality of life predicts outcomes but is not affected by peritoneal clearence. Kidney Int 67: 1093–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Passadakis P, Thodis E, Vargemezis V, Oreopoulos DG (2001) Long-term survival with peritoneal dialysis in ESRD due to diabetes. Clin Nephrol 56:257–2570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Piraino B (2002) Ademex: How should it change our practice: Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis in Mexico. Perit Dial Int 22:552–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Plum J (2005) Peritonealdialyse bei Diabetikern. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 130: 2035–2038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Rippe B, Stelin G, Haraldson B (1991) Computer simulations of peritoneal fluid transport in CAPD. Kidney Int 40:315–325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rocco M, Soucie JM, Pastan S, McClellan WM (2000) Peritoneal dialysis adequacy and risk of death. Kidney Int 58:446–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rottembourg J, Issad B, Lanlois P, Tranbaloc B, Adamou F, DeGroc F, Legrain M (1985) Loss of ultrafiltration and sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis during CAPD. Evaluation of the potential risk factors. Adv Perit Dial 1:109–117

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rubin J, Hsu H (1991) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: Ten years at one facility. Am J Kidney Dis 17:165–169

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Schwenger V (2007) PD-assoziierte Peritonitis. Nephrologe 2:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Serkes K, Blagg C, Nolph K, Vonesh F, Shapira F (1990) Comparison of patient and technique survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis: A multicenter study. Perit Dial Int 10:15–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Suzuki T, Kanno Y, Nakamoto H, Okada H, Sugahara S, Suzuki H (2003) Peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis: A five-year comparison of survival and effects on the cardiovascular system, erythropoesis, and calcium metabolism. Adv Perit Dial 19:148–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Takane H, Nakamoto H, Arima H, Shoda J, Moriwaki K, Ikeda N, Kobayashi K; Kanno Y, Sugahara S, Okada H, Suzuki H (2006) Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is effective for patients with severe congestive heart failure. Adv Perit Dial 22:141–146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Twardowski Z, Nolph K, Khanna R, Prowant B, Ryan B, Moore H, Nielson M (1987) Peritoneal equilibration test. Perit Dial Bull 7:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  50. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley, Collins AJ (2006) Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: What do they tell us? Kidney Int 103:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang AYM (2007) The “heart of peritoneal dialysis: Residual renal function. Perit Dial Int 27:116–124

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Steinkopff Verlag

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Milchsack, M., Silomon, J., Keller, F., Nebel, M. (2009). Dialysemethoden. In: Hepp, W., Koch, M., Konner, K. (eds) Dialyseshunts. Steinkopff. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1572-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7985-1572-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7985-1571-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7985-1572-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics