Abstract
Innovation intermediaries are a heterogeneous phenomenon with a relevant role in innovation processes as they are considered facilitators of the match of supply and demand in uncertain contexts. Their tasks are focused on: promoting new solutions that derive by combinations of knowledge; supporting technology development activities and trying to reduce the gap between the business and research communities. In recent years, several studies have analyzed the most important functions of intermediaries, their role in innovation process, but only few studies have focused on the rationale of innovation intermediation. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how innovation intermediaries can contribute to knowledge sharing. The intermediation processes will be compared to explain how innovation intermediaries can contribute to the creation of knowledge and the development of innovation. The paper will consist of three steps. First, a literature review will be carried out to define the intermediaries’ main functions; subsequently, the method for analysing this phenomenon will be described; the third step will discuss findings.
This paper is the result of a theoretical effort of both the authors. However, Tindara Abbate wrote paragraph 1 e 3, while Raffaella Coppolino wrote paragraphs 2 e 4.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hagedoorn, J. (2002) External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions, Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell 39(2): 167–188.
Hoffman, W. H. (2007) Strategies for managing a portfolio of alliances, Strategic Journal Management 28(8): 826–857.
Chesbrough H.W. (2003) The era of open innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review 44(3): 35–41.
Gassmann O., Enkel E. and Chesbrough H. (2010) The future of open innovation, R&D Management 40(3):213–221.
Diener, K. and Piller, F. (2010) The Market for Open Innovation: Increasing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Innovation Process,
Hargadon, A. (2003) How Breakthroughs Happen: The Surprising Truth about how Companies Innovate, Harvard Business School Press.
Howells, J. (2006) Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation, Research Policy 35(7):715–728.
Lichtenthaler, U. and Ernst, H. (2008), Intermediary services in the markets for technology: Organizational antecedents and performance consequences, Organization Studies 29(7): 1003–1035.
Bakici, T., Admirall, E. and Wareham, J. (2010) The underlying mechanisms of open innovation intermediaries, The R&D Management Conference, University of Manchester; Research and Development Management (RADMA), Manchester, 30/06/2010-02/07/2010.Available at http://www.radma.ltd.uk/conference2010/papers_abstracts/Bakici,%20Almirall,%20and%20Wareham_31.pdf.
Lichtenthaler, U. (2005) External Commercialization of Knowledge: Review and Research Agenda, International Journal of Management Review, 7: 231–255.
Daziel, M. (2010) Why do innovation intermediaries exist? DRUID Conf., London, UK, Available at http://www2.druid.dk/conferences/viewpaper.php?id=500976&cf=43
Human, S.E. and Provan, K.G. (2000) Legitimacy building in the evolution of small firm multilateral networks: A comparative study of success and demise, Administrative Science Quarterly 45: 327–365.
Bessant, J. and Rush, H. (1995) Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer, Research Policy 24: 97–114;
von Hippel, E. (1988) The Sources Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R. (1997) Technology brokering and innovation in product development firm, Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 716–749.
Verona G., Prandelli E. and Sawhney, M. (2006) Innovation and virtual environments: towards virtual knowledge brokers, Organization Studies 27:765–788.
Huston, L. and Sakkab, N. (2006) Connect and develop: Inside Procter &Gamble’s new model for innovation, Harvard Business Review 3: 58–66.
Yusuf, S. (2008) Intermediating knowledge exchange between universities and businesses, Research Policy, 37(8): 1167–1174.
Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness, The American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481–510.
Barley, S.R., Freeman, J. and Hybels R.C. (1992) Strategic alliances in commercial biotechnology, in N. Nohria & R. Eccles (EDS), Networks and organizations: 311–347 Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Williamson O.E. (1975), The Economic Institution of Capitalism: Firms, Market, Relational Contracting, Free Press, New York.
Coase, R. (1937) The Natura of the Firm, Economica 4: 386–405.
Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal 14 (January): 33–46.
Grant, R. M. (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review 33 (Spring): 114–135.
Teece D. J., Pisano G. and Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–533.
Thompson, J.D. (1967) Organizations in action. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. (1978) The external control of organizations : a resource dependence perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi I. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company, The Free Press, New York.
Winter S.G. (2002) Understanding Dynamic Capabilities – WP 2002-05, Working Paper of the Reginald H. Jones Center The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania.
Kogut B. and Zander, U. (1992) Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology, Organization Science 3(3): 383–397.
Foss, N. J. (1999), Networks, Capabilities, and Competitive Advantage, Scandinavian Journal of Management 15.
Pettgrew A. (1990) Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice, Organization Science 3: 267–292.
Lindlof, T. R. (1995) Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Smits, R. and S. Kuhlmann (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy, The International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 1:4–32.
Narver, J. C. and S. F. Slater (1990) The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability, Journal of Marketing 54 (October): 20–35.
Fleming, L. & Waguespack, D. M. (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities, Organization Science 18 (2): 165–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Coppolino, R., Abbate, T. (2012). Knowledge Sharing and Innovation: The Contribution of Innovation Intermediaries. In: De Marco, M., Te'eni, D., Albano, V., Za, S. (eds) Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2788-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2789-7
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)