Skip to main content

National Innovation Systems: An Institutional Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Korean Science and Technology in an International Perspective
  • 718 Accesses

Abstract

Combing institutional theory and research on innovation, we focus on alternatives and extensions of Pudelko and Büechl (2010)’s model of the socio-cultural context and suggest dimensions derived from institutional theory and the innovation literature as alternative approaches for analyzing innovation systems. Specifically, we propose dimensions, which have been suggested in the literature and which we deemed important for analyzing national innovation systems. Moreover, we believe that a more theoretically founded analysis of the “environment” may lead to further implications to enhance Korea’s innovativeness. Finally, in order to complement Pudelko and Büechl (2010)’s qualitative approach, we also present measures, which have been frequently used to quantify and operationalize these rather abstract dimensions. Altogether, we argue that an analysis based on established frameworks such as institutional theory may further expand the implications of Pudelko and Büechl (2010)’s model and provide a valuable starting point for improving the development of national innovation systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbey A, Dickson JW (1983) R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Acad Manage J 26(2):362–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen F, Song W-L (2002) Venture capital and corporate governance. Wharton Working Paper Series, Wharton Financial Institutions Center

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile TM, Gryskiewicz ND (1989) The creative environment scales: work environment inventory. Creat Res J 2(4):231–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden AH (1992) Asia’s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Gatignon H (1986) Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. J Int Bus Stud 17(3):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge JV, Burnham RA (1975) Organizational innovation: individual, organizational, and environmental impacts. Adm Sci Q 20(2):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry H, Guillen MF, Zhou N (2010) An institutional approach to cross-national distance. J Int Bus Stud 41(9):1460–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell J, Dunning JH, Lundan S (2010) An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: the co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. J Int Bus Stud 41(4):567–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough HW (1999) The organizational impact of technological change: a comparative theory of national institutional factors. Ind Corp Change 8:447–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choung J-Y, Taejon E (1998) Patterns of innovation in Korea and Taiwan. Eng Manag 45(4):357–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G (1999) Some notes on national systems of innovation and production, and their implication for economic analysis. In: Archibugi D, Howells J, Michie J (eds) Innovation policy in a global economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 35–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin R, Schoonhoven CB (1996) Community, population, and organisation effects on innovation: a multilevel perspective. Acad Manage J 39(5):1065–1083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drogendijk R, Slangen A (2006) Hofstede, Schwartz, or managerial perceptions? The effects of different cultural distance measures on establishment mode choices by multinational enterprises. Int Bus Rev 15(4):361–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez M, Early CP (1993) Culture, self-identity and work. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman C (1995) The ‘national system of innovation’ in historical perspective. Cambridge J Econ 19(1):5–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Furman JL, Heyes R (2004) Catching up or standing still? National innovative productivity among ‘follower nations’1978–1999. Intellectual property research institute of Australia working paper, 8(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmert M (2007) The Korean innovation system: from industrial catch-up to technological leadership? In: Mahlich J, Pascha W (eds) Innovation and technology in Korea: challenges of a newly advanced economy. Physica Verlag, Heidelberg/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Henis WJ, Williamson OE (1999) Comparative economic organization – within and between countries. Bus Polit 1(3):261–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Henisz WJ (2000) The institutional environment for economic growth. Econ Polit 12(1):1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M, Rush H, Bessant J (2004) Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. Res Policy 33(10):1433–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R (2004) Human beliefs and values. Siglo XXI, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Javidan M, House RJ, Dorfman PW, Hanges PJ, Sully de Luque M (2006) Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches. J Int Bus Stud 37(6):897–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim L (1997) Imitation to innovation: the dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly JR, Evanisko MJ (1981) Organizational innovation: the influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Acad Manage J 24(4):689–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JL, Kenneth VG, Kraemer L, McFarlan FW, Raman KS, Yap CS (1994) Institutional factors in information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 5(2):139–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova T, Roth K, Dacin T (2008) Institutional theory in the study of MNCs: a critique and new directions. Acad Manage Rev 33(4):994–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106(6):1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu JW, Hebert L (2005) Equity control and the survival of international joint ventures: a contingency approach. J Bus Res 58(6):736–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller SR, Parkhe A (2002) Is there a liability of foreignness in global banking? An empirical test of banks’ x-efficiency. Strateg Manag J 23(1):55–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Nelson K (2002) Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Res Policy 31:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Rosenberg N (1993) Technical innovation and national systems. In: Nelson RR (ed) National innovation systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng S, Lee JA, Soutar G (2007) Are Hofstede’s and Schwartz’s value frameworks congruent? Int Mark Rev 24(2):164–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2004) Science and technology statistical compendium. Meeting of the OECD committee for scientific and technological policy at ministerial level. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/17/34/23652608.pdf. Accessed 22 Sept 2010

  • Peng MW (2003) Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Acad Manage Rev 28(2):275–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce JL, Delbecq A (1977) Organisation structure, individual attitudes and innovation. Acad Manage Rev 2(1):27–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Puck JF, Holtbrügge D, Mohr AT (2009) Beyond entry mode choice: explaining the conversion of joint ventures into wholly owned subsidiaries in the People’s Republic of China. J Int Bus Stud 40(1):388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudelko M (2006) A comparison of HRM systems in the US, Japan and Germany in their socio-economic context. Hum Resour Manag J 16:123–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pudelko M, Büechl J (2011) Three potential role models for the Korean innovation system: USA, Japan and Germany. In S. Mahlich and W. Pasoha (eds.), Koreah Science and Technology in an international prespeotive. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy J-P, Oliver C (2009) International joint venture partner selection: the role of the host-country legal environment. J Int Bus Stud 40(5):779–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K (2010) Global competitiveness report 2010–2011. World economic forum. http://www.weforum.org/en/initiatives/gcp/Global%20Competitiveness%20Report/index.htm. Accessed 22 Sept 2010

  • Schwarz SH (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: new cultural dimensions of values. In: Kim U, Triandis HC, Kagitcibasi C, Yoon G (eds) Individualism and collectivism: theory, method, and applications. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 85–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1994) Institutions and organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott SG, Bruce RA (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Acad Manage J 37(3):580–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sondergaard M (1994) Hofstede’s consequences: a study of reviews, citations, and replications. Organ Stud 15(3):447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp J-BEM, Hofstede F, Wendel M (1999) A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. J Mark 63(2):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):571–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oudenhoven JP (2001) Do organizations reflect national cultures? A 10-nation study. J Intercult Relat 25(1):89–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley R (1992) Business systems in East Asia: firms, markets, and societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LK, McGuire S (2010) Economic creativity and innovation implementation: the entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries. Small Bus Econ 34(4):391–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE, Masten SE (1995) Transaction cost economics volume I: theory and concepts. Edward Elgar, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo Y, Lyytinen K, Yang H (2005) The role of standards in innovation and diffusion of broadband mobile services: the case of South Korea. J Strat Inf Syst 14(3):323–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas F. Puck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hödl, M.K., Puck, J.F. (2012). National Innovation Systems: An Institutional Perspective. In: Mahlich, J., Pascha, W. (eds) Korean Science and Technology in an International Perspective. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2753-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics