Optimality of Casino Taxation – The Case of Portugal

  • Stefan F. Schubert
  • Álvaro Matias
  • Carlos M. G. Costa


In Portugal, casinos are taxed at a 50% rate, and the tax receipts are allocated to “Turismo de Portugal”, which can use it in several ways, including subsidizing tourism firms and advertising. A recent study showed that casino demand in Portugal is predominantly originated in the domestic market. Hence, there is a debate about if casinos should be taxed so heavily.

This paper aims at contributing to this debate. We develop a dynamic general equilibrium model of a small open economy, comprising an industrial sector, producing an internationally traded good, a tourism sector, producing tourism services, offered both to foreign tourists and residents, and a casino sector, supplying gambling services. Domestic residents derive utility from consuming the traded good, tourism services, and gambling. We analytically derive the effects of a reduction in casino taxation and demonstrate that this is welfare improving.


Relative Price Small Open Economy Tourism Sector Industrial Good Casino Gambling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barro RJ (1974) Are government bonds net wealth? J Polit Econ 82(6):1095–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chao C-C, Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2005) Tourism and economic development in a cash-in-advance economy. Res Int Bus Finance 19:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao C-C, Hazari BR, Laffargue J-P, Sgro PM, Yu ESH (2006) Tourism, Dutch disease and welfare in an open dynamic economy. Jpn Econ Rev 57:501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gómez CM, Lozano J, Rey-Maquieira J (2008) Environmental policy and long-term welfare in a tourism economy. Span Econ Rev 10(1):41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hazari BR, Sgro PM (1995) Tourism and growth in a dynamic model of trade. J Int Trade Econ Dev 4:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2004) Tourism, trade and national welfare. In: Contributions to economic analysis. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Matias Á, Costa CMG, Gil-Alana L (2010) The economics of casino gambling: evidence for Portugal. J Tourism Dev 13:119–120Google Scholar
  8. Nowak J-J, Sali M, Cortés-Jiménez I (2007) Tourism, capital good imports and economic growth: theory and evidence for Spain. Tourism Econ 13(4):515–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rybczynski TM (1955) Factor endowment and relative commodity prices. Economica 22:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schubert SF, Brida JG (2008) Dynamic effects of subsidizing the tourism sector. Tourism Econ 14(1):57–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schubert SF, Brida JG (2009) Macroeconomic effects of changes in tourism demand: a simple dynamic model. Tourism Econ 15(3):591–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Turnovsky SJ (1997) International macroeconomic dynamics. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan F. Schubert
    • 1
  • Álvaro Matias
    • 2
  • Carlos M. G. Costa
    • 3
  1. 1.Competence Centre in Tourism Management and Tourism Economics (TOMTE)Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, School of Economics and ManagementBolzanoItaly
  2. 2.School of Economics and BusinessUniversidade Lusíada de LisboaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Estoril-Sol, Casino LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations