Skip to main content

Dynamic Model of Economic Growth in a Small Tourism Driven Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tourism Economics

Abstract

International tourism is one of the fastest growing industries, accounting for more than 10% of total international trade and almost half of total trade in services, and can be considered as one of the world’s largest export earners. In many countries, foreign currency receipts from tourism exceeds currency receipts from all other sectors together. Thus, tourism, which is an alternative form of exports, contributes to the balance of payments through foreign exchange earnings and proceeds generated from tourism expansion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An exception is Schubert and Brida (2008).

  2. 2.

    The benchmark speed of adjustment is around 2–3% per annum (see Mankiw et al. 1992; Barro and Sala-i-Martin 1992; and others). Of course, these estimates have been challenged, but the consensus remains that the speed of adjustment may be somewhat higher than originally suggested, but probably less than 6% per annum; see, e.g., Islam (1995) and Evans (1997).

  3. 3.

    The constant supply of labor of domestic households is contained in the \( A \) expression. The AK technology can be justified by referring to the replication argument. Of course, the use of more capital (hotels, resorts, etc.) will require more labor, too. As domestic residents supply labor at a fixed quantity, increasing labor demand will be met by employing foreign workers, as can be frequently observed in reality. To keep the model as simple as possible, one can think K as being broadly defined, including foreign labor supply. This too justifies assuming an AK technology. We also assume away externalities in production (which can also serve as a justification of the AK model), because they are not relevant for the issue at hand. For more on the AK technology, see, e.g., Turnovsky (2003).

  4. 4.

    While this assumption may not be reasonable for some developing countries, it clearly holds for a region within a country, to which the model applies equally well.

  5. 5.

    There is a lot of empirical evidence that the income elasticity of tourism demand is well above unity (see, e.g., Syriopoulos (1995), and Lanza et al. (2003), reporting income elasticities in the range between 1.75 and 7.36), and that the price elasticity is quite low (Lanza et al. 2003) derived price elasticities in the range between 1.03 and 1.82). See also the comparison of different studies on elasticities in Garín-Muños (2007).

  6. 6.

    Time derivatives will be denoted by dots above the variable concerned, \( \dot{x} \equiv \frac{{dx}}{{dt}} \).

  7. 7.

    Note that q is the ratio of the marginal utility of an additional unit of installed capital, γ, over the marginal utility of traded bonds, λ, which can also be interpreted as the marginal cost of an additional unit of uninstalled capital, because one unit of uninstalled capital trades for one foreign bond.

  8. 8.

    See, e.g., Brock and Turnovsky (1981:180).

  9. 9.

    Note that the transversality condition \( \mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } \lambda qK{e^{ - \beta t}} = 0 \) requires \( r > \sigma n \).

  10. 10.

    Note that because of goods market clearance (10.5) p(0) cannot change upon a change in the growth rate of foreign income, which leaves the time t = 0 level of demand constant. Hence, \( p(0) = {p_0} \) is historically given. In contrast, the market price of installed capital, q, is free to jump upon arrival of new information.

  11. 11.

    See the Appendix.

  12. 12.

    This issue is discussed in detail in Turnovsky (1996).

  13. 13.

    To see this, consider the characteristic equation of (10.16), \( {\mu^2} - \mu (r - \sigma n) - A\tilde{p}/(\varepsilon h) = 0 \), from which it follows \( d{\mu_1}/d\varepsilon = - A\tilde{p}/[{\varepsilon^2}h(2{\mu_1} - (r - \sigma n))] \,> \,0 \), where \( {\mu_1} \,<\, 0 \). Hence \( {\mu_1} \) becomes smaller in absolute terms.

References

  • Balaguer J, Cantavella-Jordá M (2002) Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: the Spanish case. Appl Econ 34:877–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer J, Cantavella-Jordá M (2004) Structural change in exports and economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis for Spain (1961–2000). Appl Econ 36:473–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Public finance in models of economic growth. Rev Econ Stud 59:645–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brau R, Lanza A, Pigliaru F (2007) How fast are small tourism countries growing? Evidence from the data for 1980–2003. Tourism Econ 13:603–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock WA, Turnovsky SJ (1981) The analysis of macroeconomic policies in perfect foresight equilibrium. Int Econ Rev 22:179–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao CC, Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2005) Tourism and economic development in a cash-in-advance economy. Res Int Bus Finance 19:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao CC, Hazari BR, Laffargue JP, Sgro PM, Yu ESH (2006) Tourism, Dutch disease and welfare in an open dynamic economy. Jpn Econ Rev 57:501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao CC, Hazari BR, Laffargue JP, Sgro PM, Yu ESH (2008) Tourism, jobs, capital accumulation and the economy: a dynamic analysis. In: Lanza RB, Usai S (eds) Tourism and sustainable economic development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 105–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Corténez-Jiménez I, Pulina M (2006) A further step into the ELGH and TLGH for Spain and Italy. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Paper 118.2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Croes RR (2006) A paradigm shift to a new strategy for small island economies: embracing demand side economics for value enhancement and long term economic stability. Tourism Manage 27:453–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dritsakis N (2004) Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: an empirical investigation for Greece using causality analysis. Tourism Econ 10:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbarry R (2004) Tourism and economic growth: the case of Mauritius. Tourism Econ 10:389–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1997) How fast do economies converge? Rev Econ Stat 79:219–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garín-Muños T (2007) German demand for tourism in Spain. Tourism Manage 28:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunduz L, Hatemi JA (2005) Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey? Appl Econ Lett 12:499–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal q and average q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50:213–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazari BR, Sgro PM (1995) Tourism and growth in a dynamic model of trade. J Int Trade Econ Dev 4:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2004) Tourism, trade and national welfare. Contributions to economic analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110:1127–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu ST (2009) Revisiting the tourism-led-growth hypothesis for Turkey using the Bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration. Tourism Manage 30:17–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim HJ, Chen MH, Jang SS (2006) Tourism expansion and economic development: the case of Taiwan. Tourism Manage 27:925–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza A, Temple P, Urga G (2003) The implications of tourism specialisation in the long run: an econometric analysis for 13 OECD economies. Tourism Manage 24:315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louca C (2006) Income and expenditure in the tourism industry: time series evidence from Cyprus. Tourism Econ 12:603–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy JL (2003) Tourism development in small islands across the world. Geogr Ann 85:231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy JL (2006) Small island tourist economies across the life cycle. Asia Pac Viewp 47:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihalic T (2002) Tourism and economic development issues. In: Sharply R, Telfer DJ (eds) Tourism and development: concepts and issues. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, UK, pp 81–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Noriko I, Mototsugu F (2007) Impacts of tourism and fiscal expenditure to remote islands: the case of the Amami islands in Japan. Appl Econ Lett 14:661–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak JJ, Sali M, Cortés-Jiménez I (2007) Tourism, capital good imports and economic growth: theory and evidence for Spain. Tourism Econ 13:515–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh CO (2005) The contribution of tourism development to economic growth in the Korean economy. Tourism Manage 26:9–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert SF, Brida JG (2008) Dynamic effects of subsidizing the tourism sector. Tourism Econ 14:57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert SF, Brida JG (2009) Macroeconomic effects of changes in tourism demand: a simple dynamic model. Tourism Econ 15:591–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan J, Wilson K (2001) Causality between trade and tourism: empirical evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett 8:279–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair MT (1998) Tourism and economic development: a survey. J Dev Stud 34:1–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soukiazis E, Proença S (2008) Tourism as an alternative source of regional growth in Portugal: a panel data analysis at NUTS II and III levels. Port Econ J 7:43–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syriopoulos TC (1995) A dynamic model of demand for mediterranean tourism. Int Rev Appl Econ 9:318–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky SJ (1996) Fiscal policy, growth, and macroeconomic performance in a small open economy. J Int Econ 40:41–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turnovsky SJ (2003) Old and new growth theories: a unifying structure? In: Salvadori N (ed) Old and new growth theories: an assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 1–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas M, Croes RR (2000) Evaluation of demand: Us tourists to Aruba. Ann Tourism Res 27:946–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanegas M, Croes RR (2003) Growth, development and tourism in a small economy: evidence from Aruba. Int J Tourism Res 5:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WTTC (2008) Country League Tables. World Travel and Tourism Council. http://www.wttc.org/bin/pdf/original_pdf_file/newleaguetablesummary.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan F. Schubert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Derivation of \( \dot{b}(t) \)

Time differentiating \( b \equiv B/{Y^\sigma } \) gives

$$ \dot{b} = \frac{{\dot{B}}}{{{Y^\sigma }}} - \sigma \frac{B}{{{Y^\sigma }}}\frac{{\dot{Y}}}{Y} = \frac{{\dot{B}}}{{{Y^\sigma }}} - \sigma nb. $$
(10.18)

Dividing (10.1a) by \( {Y^\sigma } \), noting that from (10.3b) we can write \( \Phi (I,K) = \frac{{{q^2} - 1}}{{2h}}K \), we get

$$ \frac{{\dot{B}}}{{{Y^\sigma }}} = pA\frac{K}{{{Y^\sigma }}} - \frac{C}{{{Y^\sigma }}} - \frac{{{q^2} - 1}}{{2h}}\frac{K}{{{Y^\sigma }}} + r\frac{B}{{{Y^\sigma }}}. $$
(10.19)

Inserting (10.19) into (10.18), applying the definitions

$$ k \equiv \frac{K}{{{Y^\sigma }}},\quad c \equiv \frac{C}{{{Y^\sigma }}},\quad b \equiv \frac{B}{{{Y^\sigma }}} $$

and rearranging terms results in

$$ \dot{b} = (r - \sigma n)b + \left( {pA - \frac{{{q^2} - 1}}{{2h}}} \right)k - c, $$
(10.20)

which is (10.13) in the text.

1.2 Solution of \( b(t) \)

Linearizing (10.13) around a hypothetical steady-state, noting that \( {b^{\hskip-2pt\dot\tilde}} = 0 \), we get

$$ \begin{array}{ll}\dot{b} - (r - \sigma n)(b - \tilde{b})= & A\tilde{k}(p - \tilde{p}) - \left( {\tilde{p}A - \frac{{{{\tilde{q}}^2} - 1}}{{2h}}} \right)(k - \tilde{k}) \\&- \frac{{\tilde{q}\tilde{k}}}{h}(q - \tilde{q}) - (c - \tilde{c}).\end{array} $$
(10.21)

Using \( c(t) = c(0){ \exp }[({\psi_C} - \sigma n)t] \), the stable solutions for \( k \), (10.12) and \( q \), (10.9b), and the definition of the steady-state of \( b \),

$$ - (r - \sigma n)\tilde{b} = \left( {\tilde{p}A - \frac{{{{\tilde{q}}^2} - 1}}{{2h}}} \right)\tilde{k} - \tilde{c}, $$

Equation (10.21) can be written as

$$ \dot{b} - (r - \sigma n)b = L{e^{{\mu_1}t}} - c(0){e^{({\psi_C} - \sigma n)t}} + M. $$
(10.22)

\( L \) and \( M \) are defined as

$$ L \equiv \left[ {A\tilde{k} + \left( {\tilde{p}A - \frac{{{{\tilde{q}}^2} - 1}}{{2h}} + {\mu_1}\tilde{q}} \right)\frac{{\varepsilon \tilde{k}}}{{\tilde{p}}}} \,\right]\left( {{p_0} - \tilde{p}} \right) $$
(10.23)
$$ M \equiv \left[ {\tilde{p}A - \frac{{{{\tilde{q}}^2} - 1}}{{2h}}} \right]\tilde{k} $$
(10.24)

where for notational convenience we have made use of the fact that from the system’s eigenvectors it follows that

$$ - \frac{{{\mu_1}\varepsilon h}}{{\tilde{p}}} \,= \,\frac{A}{{r - \sigma n - {\mu_1}}} \,> \, 0. $$

\( L \) denotes the difference between output and investment costs along the stable saddle path. \( M \) measures the difference between steady-state production and steady-state investment costs.

Multiplying (10.22) by the integrating factor \( {e^{ - (r - \sigma n)t}} \), and performing the integration yields

$$ \begin{array}{ll} {b(t) = } & {\left[ {{b_0} - \displaystyle\frac{L}{{{\mu_1} - r + \sigma n}} + \frac{{c(0)}}{{{\psi_C} - r}} + \frac{M}{{r - \sigma n}}} \right]{e^{(r - \sigma n)t}}} \hfill \\{} \hfill & { + \displaystyle\frac{L}{{{\mu_1} - r + \sigma n}}{e^{{\mu_1}t}} - \frac{{c(0)}}{{{\psi_C} - r}}{e^{({\psi_C} - \sigma n)t}} - \frac{M}{{r - \sigma n}}} \hfill \\\end{array} $$
(10.25)

The transversality condition for \( B \), \( \mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } \lambda B{e^{ - \beta t}} = 0 \), can be rewritten as \( Y_0^\sigma \lambda (0)\mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } b(t){e^{(\sigma n - r)t}} = 0 \). Inserting (10.25), this is met if

$$ {b_0} - \frac{L}{{{\mu_1} - r + \sigma n}} + \frac{{c(0)}}{{{\psi_C} - r}} + \frac{M}{{r - \sigma n}} = 0 $$
(10.26)
$$ {\psi_C} < r. $$
(10.27)

Equation (10.26) is the economy’s intertemporal budget constraint and determines \( c(0) \) and thus \( \lambda (0) \). Equation (10.27) introduces an upper bound on \( {\psi_C} \equiv \displaystyle\frac{{r - \beta }}{{1 - \gamma }} \) and can be rewritten as \( \gamma < \frac{\beta }{r} \), and defines thus an upper bound on the intertemporal elasticity of substitution \( 1/(1 - \gamma ) \). Hence, the solution of \( b \) consistent with long-run solvency becomes

$$ b(t) = \frac{L}{{{\mu_1} - r + \sigma n}}{e^{{\mu_1}t}} - \frac{{c(0)}}{{{\psi_C} - r}}{e^{({\psi_C} - \sigma n)t}} - \frac{M}{{r - \sigma n}}. $$
(10.28)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schubert, S.F., Brida, J.G. (2011). Dynamic Model of Economic Growth in a Small Tourism Driven Economy. In: Matias, Á., Nijkamp, P., Sarmento, M. (eds) Tourism Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2725-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics