Abstract
International tourism is one of the fastest growing industries, accounting for more than 10% of total international trade and almost half of total trade in services, and can be considered as one of the world’s largest export earners. In many countries, foreign currency receipts from tourism exceeds currency receipts from all other sectors together. Thus, tourism, which is an alternative form of exports, contributes to the balance of payments through foreign exchange earnings and proceeds generated from tourism expansion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
An exception is Schubert and Brida (2008).
- 2.
The benchmark speed of adjustment is around 2–3% per annum (see Mankiw et al. 1992; Barro and Sala-i-Martin 1992; and others). Of course, these estimates have been challenged, but the consensus remains that the speed of adjustment may be somewhat higher than originally suggested, but probably less than 6% per annum; see, e.g., Islam (1995) and Evans (1997).
- 3.
The constant supply of labor of domestic households is contained in the \( A \) expression. The AK technology can be justified by referring to the replication argument. Of course, the use of more capital (hotels, resorts, etc.) will require more labor, too. As domestic residents supply labor at a fixed quantity, increasing labor demand will be met by employing foreign workers, as can be frequently observed in reality. To keep the model as simple as possible, one can think K as being broadly defined, including foreign labor supply. This too justifies assuming an AK technology. We also assume away externalities in production (which can also serve as a justification of the AK model), because they are not relevant for the issue at hand. For more on the AK technology, see, e.g., Turnovsky (2003).
- 4.
While this assumption may not be reasonable for some developing countries, it clearly holds for a region within a country, to which the model applies equally well.
- 5.
There is a lot of empirical evidence that the income elasticity of tourism demand is well above unity (see, e.g., Syriopoulos (1995), and Lanza et al. (2003), reporting income elasticities in the range between 1.75 and 7.36), and that the price elasticity is quite low (Lanza et al. 2003) derived price elasticities in the range between 1.03 and 1.82). See also the comparison of different studies on elasticities in Garín-Muños (2007).
- 6.
Time derivatives will be denoted by dots above the variable concerned, \( \dot{x} \equiv \frac{{dx}}{{dt}} \).
- 7.
Note that q is the ratio of the marginal utility of an additional unit of installed capital, γ, over the marginal utility of traded bonds, λ, which can also be interpreted as the marginal cost of an additional unit of uninstalled capital, because one unit of uninstalled capital trades for one foreign bond.
- 8.
See, e.g., Brock and Turnovsky (1981:180).
- 9.
Note that the transversality condition \( \mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } \lambda qK{e^{ - \beta t}} = 0 \) requires \( r > \sigma n \).
- 10.
Note that because of goods market clearance (10.5) p(0) cannot change upon a change in the growth rate of foreign income, which leaves the time t = 0 level of demand constant. Hence, \( p(0) = {p_0} \) is historically given. In contrast, the market price of installed capital, q, is free to jump upon arrival of new information.
- 11.
See the Appendix.
- 12.
This issue is discussed in detail in Turnovsky (1996).
- 13.
To see this, consider the characteristic equation of (10.16), \( {\mu^2} - \mu (r - \sigma n) - A\tilde{p}/(\varepsilon h) = 0 \), from which it follows \( d{\mu_1}/d\varepsilon = - A\tilde{p}/[{\varepsilon^2}h(2{\mu_1} - (r - \sigma n))] \,> \,0 \), where \( {\mu_1} \,<\, 0 \). Hence \( {\mu_1} \) becomes smaller in absolute terms.
References
Balaguer J, Cantavella-Jordá M (2002) Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: the Spanish case. Appl Econ 34:877–884
Balaguer J, Cantavella-Jordá M (2004) Structural change in exports and economic growth: cointegration and causality analysis for Spain (1961–2000). Appl Econ 36:473–477
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Public finance in models of economic growth. Rev Econ Stud 59:645–661
Brau R, Lanza A, Pigliaru F (2007) How fast are small tourism countries growing? Evidence from the data for 1980–2003. Tourism Econ 13:603–613
Brock WA, Turnovsky SJ (1981) The analysis of macroeconomic policies in perfect foresight equilibrium. Int Econ Rev 22:179–209
Chao CC, Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2005) Tourism and economic development in a cash-in-advance economy. Res Int Bus Finance 19:365–373
Chao CC, Hazari BR, Laffargue JP, Sgro PM, Yu ESH (2006) Tourism, Dutch disease and welfare in an open dynamic economy. Jpn Econ Rev 57:501–515
Chao CC, Hazari BR, Laffargue JP, Sgro PM, Yu ESH (2008) Tourism, jobs, capital accumulation and the economy: a dynamic analysis. In: Lanza RB, Usai S (eds) Tourism and sustainable economic development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 105–123
Corténez-Jiménez I, Pulina M (2006) A further step into the ELGH and TLGH for Spain and Italy. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Working Paper 118.2006
Croes RR (2006) A paradigm shift to a new strategy for small island economies: embracing demand side economics for value enhancement and long term economic stability. Tourism Manage 27:453–465
Dritsakis N (2004) Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: an empirical investigation for Greece using causality analysis. Tourism Econ 10:305–316
Durbarry R (2004) Tourism and economic growth: the case of Mauritius. Tourism Econ 10:389–401
Evans P (1997) How fast do economies converge? Rev Econ Stat 79:219–225
Garín-Muños T (2007) German demand for tourism in Spain. Tourism Manage 28:12–22
Gunduz L, Hatemi JA (2005) Is the tourism-led growth hypothesis valid for Turkey? Appl Econ Lett 12:499–504
Hayashi F (1982) Tobin’s marginal q and average q: a neoclassical interpretation. Econometrica 50:213–224
Hazari BR, Sgro PM (1995) Tourism and growth in a dynamic model of trade. J Int Trade Econ Dev 4:243–252
Hazari BR, Sgro PM (2004) Tourism, trade and national welfare. Contributions to economic analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Islam N (1995) Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Q J Econ 110:1127–1170
Katircioglu ST (2009) Revisiting the tourism-led-growth hypothesis for Turkey using the Bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration. Tourism Manage 30:17–20
Kim HJ, Chen MH, Jang SS (2006) Tourism expansion and economic development: the case of Taiwan. Tourism Manage 27:925–933
Lanza A, Temple P, Urga G (2003) The implications of tourism specialisation in the long run: an econometric analysis for 13 OECD economies. Tourism Manage 24:315–321
Louca C (2006) Income and expenditure in the tourism industry: time series evidence from Cyprus. Tourism Econ 12:603–617
Mankiw NG, Romer D, Weil DN (1992) A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q J Econ 107:407–437
McElroy JL (2003) Tourism development in small islands across the world. Geogr Ann 85:231–242
McElroy JL (2006) Small island tourist economies across the life cycle. Asia Pac Viewp 47:61–77
Mihalic T (2002) Tourism and economic development issues. In: Sharply R, Telfer DJ (eds) Tourism and development: concepts and issues. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, UK, pp 81–111
Noriko I, Mototsugu F (2007) Impacts of tourism and fiscal expenditure to remote islands: the case of the Amami islands in Japan. Appl Econ Lett 14:661–666
Nowak JJ, Sali M, Cortés-Jiménez I (2007) Tourism, capital good imports and economic growth: theory and evidence for Spain. Tourism Econ 13:515–536
Oh CO (2005) The contribution of tourism development to economic growth in the Korean economy. Tourism Manage 26:9–44
Schubert SF, Brida JG (2008) Dynamic effects of subsidizing the tourism sector. Tourism Econ 14:57–80
Schubert SF, Brida JG (2009) Macroeconomic effects of changes in tourism demand: a simple dynamic model. Tourism Econ 15:591–613
Shan J, Wilson K (2001) Causality between trade and tourism: empirical evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett 8:279–283
Sinclair MT (1998) Tourism and economic development: a survey. J Dev Stud 34:1–51
Soukiazis E, Proença S (2008) Tourism as an alternative source of regional growth in Portugal: a panel data analysis at NUTS II and III levels. Port Econ J 7:43–61
Syriopoulos TC (1995) A dynamic model of demand for mediterranean tourism. Int Rev Appl Econ 9:318–336
Turnovsky SJ (1996) Fiscal policy, growth, and macroeconomic performance in a small open economy. J Int Econ 40:41–66
Turnovsky SJ (2003) Old and new growth theories: a unifying structure? In: Salvadori N (ed) Old and new growth theories: an assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 1–43
Vanegas M, Croes RR (2000) Evaluation of demand: Us tourists to Aruba. Ann Tourism Res 27:946–963
Vanegas M, Croes RR (2003) Growth, development and tourism in a small economy: evidence from Aruba. Int J Tourism Res 5:315–330
WTTC (2008) Country League Tables. World Travel and Tourism Council. http://www.wttc.org/bin/pdf/original_pdf_file/newleaguetablesummary.pdf. Accessed 4 Mar 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 Derivation of \( \dot{b}(t) \)
Time differentiating \( b \equiv B/{Y^\sigma } \) gives
Dividing (10.1a) by \( {Y^\sigma } \), noting that from (10.3b) we can write \( \Phi (I,K) = \frac{{{q^2} - 1}}{{2h}}K \), we get
Inserting (10.19) into (10.18), applying the definitions
and rearranging terms results in
which is (10.13) in the text.
1.2 Solution of \( b(t) \)
Linearizing (10.13) around a hypothetical steady-state, noting that \( {b^{\hskip-2pt\dot\tilde}} = 0 \), we get
Using \( c(t) = c(0){ \exp }[({\psi_C} - \sigma n)t] \), the stable solutions for \( k \), (10.12) and \( q \), (10.9b), and the definition of the steady-state of \( b \),
Equation (10.21) can be written as
\( L \) and \( M \) are defined as
where for notational convenience we have made use of the fact that from the system’s eigenvectors it follows that
\( L \) denotes the difference between output and investment costs along the stable saddle path. \( M \) measures the difference between steady-state production and steady-state investment costs.
Multiplying (10.22) by the integrating factor \( {e^{ - (r - \sigma n)t}} \), and performing the integration yields
The transversality condition for \( B \), \( \mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } \lambda B{e^{ - \beta t}} = 0 \), can be rewritten as \( Y_0^\sigma \lambda (0)\mathop {{ \lim }}\nolimits_{t \to \infty } b(t){e^{(\sigma n - r)t}} = 0 \). Inserting (10.25), this is met if
Equation (10.26) is the economy’s intertemporal budget constraint and determines \( c(0) \) and thus \( \lambda (0) \). Equation (10.27) introduces an upper bound on \( {\psi_C} \equiv \displaystyle\frac{{r - \beta }}{{1 - \gamma }} \) and can be rewritten as \( \gamma < \frac{\beta }{r} \), and defines thus an upper bound on the intertemporal elasticity of substitution \( 1/(1 - \gamma ) \). Hence, the solution of \( b \) consistent with long-run solvency becomes
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schubert, S.F., Brida, J.G. (2011). Dynamic Model of Economic Growth in a Small Tourism Driven Economy. In: Matias, Á., Nijkamp, P., Sarmento, M. (eds) Tourism Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2725-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2725-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2724-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2725-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)