Relationships Between ERP and Business Intelligence: An Empirical Research on Two Different Upgrade Approaches

  • C. Caserio


Many studies acknowledge the growing role of Business Intelligence Systems (BIS) deployment in supporting business decision-making processes. This development involves both transactional systems, such as the implementation of ERPs, and BI models, as well as reporting tools, business analytics, and data mining.

The hypothesis is that the decision making process depends on the quality of all the links before the BIS implementation, such as the ERP implementation and upgrade, the organization of the business data, the deep awareness of the business, the desired level of BIS implementation and upgrading (i.e. reporting, predictive analysis, data mining, and so forth).

The aim of the research is to evaluate the main reasons that drive companies to implement and upgrade ERP and BIS, in light of potential relationships among them. A comparative case study, made for the purpose of this research, shows two different approaches to ERP/BIS. At the end, some considerations about them are discussed.


Business Process Spreadsheet Program Group Decision Support System Unstructured Information Business Architecture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Nah F, Faja S, Cata T, (2001) Characteristics of ERP software maintenance: a multiple case study. J. Software Mainten. & Evol.: Res & Prac. 13(6):399–414.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Olson DL, Zhao F, (2007) CIO’s perspectives of critical success factors in ERP upgrade projects. Enterprise Information Systems 1(1): 129–138.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1999) Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach. Management Science 36(2):123–139.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Malmsjö A, Övelius E (2003) Factors that Induce Change in Information Systems. System Research and Behavioral Science 20(3):243–253.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Newkirk HE, Lederer AL, Johnson AM, (2008) The Impact of Business and IT Change on Strategic Information Systems Alignment. Northeast Decision Sciences Institute Proceedings 28(30):469–474.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee CT (2010) Selecting Technologies for Constantly Changing Applications Markets. Technology Management 53(1):44–54.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walker WE (1994) Organizational Decision Support Systems: Centralized Support for Decentralized Organizations. Annals of Operations Research, 51(6):283–298.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    George JF (1992) The Conceptualization and Development of Organizational Decision Support Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 8(3):109–125.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bui T, Jarke M (1986) Communications Requirements for Group Decision Support Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems vol. II(4):8–2.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nah F, Delgado S, (2006) Critical success factors for enterprise resource planning implementation and upgrade. Journal of Computer Information Systems 47(1):99–113.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Collins K (1999) Strategy and execution of ERP upgrades. Gov. Finance Rev. 15(4):43–47.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davenport TH (1998) Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System. Harvard Business Review 76(4):121–131.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bingi P, Sharma MK, Godla J (1999) Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Information System Management 16(3):7–14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trott P, Hoecht A, (2004) Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) And Its Impact on the Innovative Capability of the Firm. International Journal of Innovation Management 8(4):381–398.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holsapple CW, Sena MP (2003) The Decision-Support Characteristics of ERP Systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16(1):101–123.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stevens CP, (2003) Enterprise Resource Planning: a Trio of Resources. Information Systems Management 20(3):61–67.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hoelscher R (2002) Business Intelligence Platforms boost ERP. Financial Executive Mar(1):66–68.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Simons P, (2008) Business Intelligence. Financial Management Sep(1):44–47.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Forrester Research.
  20. 20.
    Alavi M, Henderson JC (1981) An Evolutionary Strategy for Implementing a Decision Support System. Management Science 27(11):1309–1323.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Calvasina R, Calvasina E, Ramaswamy M, Calvasina G (2009) Data Quality Problems in Responsibility Accounting. Issues in Information Systems X(2):48–57.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gorgan V, Oancea M (2008) Data Quality in Business Intelligence Applications. Annals of the University of Oradea Economic Science Series, 17(4):1364–1368.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Howson C (2009) Successful BI Survey – Best Practices in Business Intelligence for Greater Business Impact. ASK LLC November 2009.
  24. 24.
    Zhang H, Liang Y, (2006) A Knowledge Warehouse System for Enterprise Resource Planning Systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 23(2):169–176, DOI: 10.1002/sres.753.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bara A, Botha I, Diaconita V, Lungu I, Velicanu A, Velicanu M (2009) A model for Business Intelligence Systems’ Development. Informatica Economicâ, 13(4):99–108.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cleland DI, King WR (1975) Competitive Business Intelligence Systems. Business Horizons, 18(6):19–28.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baars H, Kemper HG (2008) Management Support with Structured and Unstructured Data – An Integrated Business Intelligence Framework. Information Systems Management 25(2):132–148. DOI: 10.1080/10580530801941058.
  28. 28.
    Olszak CM, Ziemba E, (2007) Approach to Building and Implementing Business Intelligence Systems. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge and Management 2(1):135–148.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yeoh W, Koronios A (2010) Critical Success Factors for Business Intelligence Systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems 50(3):23–32.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barki H, Huff SL, (1990) Implementing Decision Support Systems: Correlates of User Satisfaction and System Usage. Infor 28(2):89-101.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coderre DG (2000) Computer Assisted Fraud Detection. Internal Auditor 57(4):25–27.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Christensen JA, Byington JR (2003) The computer: An essential fraud detection tool. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance (Wiley) 14(5):23–27.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pugna IB, Albescu F, Babeanu D, (2009) The Role of Business Intelligence in Business Performance Management. Annals of the University of Oradea Economic Science Series 18(4):1025–1029.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Denscombe M (2003) The good research guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Curasi CF (2001) A critical exploration of face-to-face interviewing vs. computer-mediated interviewing. International Journal of Market Research 43(4):361–375.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Murray CD, Sixsmith J (1998). E-mail: A qualitative research medium for interviewing? International Journal of Social Research Methodology 1(2):103–121.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yin RK, (2008) Case Study Research: Design and Methods,. Sage Pubns.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Olsen TE (1996) Agency costs and the limits of integration. RAND Journal of Economics 27(3):479–501.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mollick JS (2009) Spreadsheet Program Usage for Ten Job Tasks in Organizations – an Empirical Investigation. Issues in Information Systems X(2):604–613.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations