Advertisement

Operational Innovation: From Principles to Methodology

  • M. Della Bordella
  • A. Ravarini
  • F. Y. Wu
  • R. Liu
Chapter

Abstract

The present research has the objective to discover and understand potential sources of Sustained Competitive Advantage (SCA) for companies and exploit this potential in order to achieve and maintain the competitive advantage through operational innovation and especially through the implementation of IT-dependent strategic initiatives. A new strategic analysis methodology is proposed and described within the paper. The concept of Business Artifact (BA) already introduced and used for business process modeling within the Model Driven Business Transformation (MDBT) framework is the basic element of our methodology. The theoretical foundations of the work are provided by the Resource Based View (RBV) of the firm theory [Barney, J Manage 17(1):99–120, 1991] and by the Critical Success Factors (CSF) method [Rockart, Harv Bus Rev 57(2):81–93, 1979]. Considering that, by definition, each Business Artifact has a data model, in which all the resources it needs and uses during its lifecycle are specified, we want to identify which Business Artifacts are strategically relevant for a company and prioritize them according to the Sustained Competitive Advantage they could be able to provide. These key BAs should then be the target of any IT-dependent strategic initiative, that should include actions aimed at improving or transforming these BAs in order to achieve, maintain and exploit the company competitive advantage.

References

  1. 1.
    Avison, D., Jones, J., Powell, P. and Wilson, D. N. “Using and Validating the Strategic Alignment Model”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, (13:3), 2004, pp. 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhattacharya, K., Guttman, R., Lymann, K., Heath III, F.F., Kumaran, S., Nandi, P., Wu, F.Y., Athma, P., Freiberg, C., Johannsen, L., Staudt, A. (2005). A model-driven approach to industrializing discovery processes in pharmaceutical research. IBM Systems Journal, 44(1):145.162Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhattacharya, K., Caswell, N.S., Kumaran, S., Nigam, A., Wu, F.Y. (2007). “Artifact-centered operational modeling: lessons from customer engagements”. IBM Systems Journal, v.46 n.4, p.703-721, October 2007Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caron, J.; Jarvenpaa, Sirkka; and Stoddard, Donna. 1994. “Business Reengineering at CIGNA Corporation: Experiences and Lessons Learned from the First Five Years,” MIS Quarterly, (18: 3).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chao, T., Cohn, D., Flatgard, A., Hahn, A., Linehan, N., Nandi, P., Nigam, A., Pinel, F., Vergo, J., Wu, F.Y. (2009). “Artifact-Based Transformation of IBM Global Financing”. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Business Process Management, Ulm, Germany.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Della Bordella, M., Ravarini, A., Liu, R., (2009) “Performance measurement and strategic analysis for Model Driven Business Transformation” 8th Workshop on e-business, Phoenix, 2009.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grant, R. M. (1991). “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation.” California Management Review 33(3): 114–135.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hammer, M. (1990). “Reengineering work: don’t automate, obliterate” Harvard Business Review Vol.68 N.4, pp 104–112Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammer, M., Stanton, S. (1999). “How process enterprises really work” Harvard Business Review Vol.77, N.6, pp 108–120Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hammer, M. (2004). “Deep change: how operational innovation can transform your company” Harvard Business Review Vol.82, N.4, April 2004Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumaran, S., Liu, R. and Wu, F. Y. (2008). “On the Duality of Information-Centric and Activity-Centric Models of Business Processes”. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’08), 2008, pp. 32–47.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, R., Bhattacharya, K., Wu, F.Y. (2007). “Modeling business contexture and behavior using Business Artifacts”. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE’07).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu, R., Wu, F.Y., Patnaik, Y., Kumaran, S. (2009) “Business Artifacts: An SOA Approach to Progressive Core Banking Renovation,” scc, pp.466-473, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing, 2009Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S. (2003). “Business Artifacts: An approach to operational specification”. IBM Systems Journal, v.42 n.3, p.428-445, July 2003Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piccoli, G. and B. Ives (2005). “IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature.” MIS Quarterly 29(4).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter, M. (1981). “The contributions of industrial organization to strategic management.” Academy of Management Review 6(4): 609–620.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rockart, J.F. (1979) “Chief executives define their own data needs” Harvard Business Review Vol.57 N.2, pp 81–93Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Russo, M. V. a. F., P.A. (1997). “A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability.” Academy of Management Journal 40: 534–559.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wade, M., and Hulland, J. (2004). “Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research,” MIS Quarterly (23:1), 2004, pp. 107–142.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wonseok, O. and Pinsonneault, A. “On the Assessment of the Strategic Value of Information Technologies: Conceptual and Analytical Approaches”, MIS Quarterly, (31:2), 2007, pp. 239–265.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Della Bordella
    • 1
  • A. Ravarini
    • 1
  • F. Y. Wu
    • 2
  • R. Liu
    • 2
  1. 1.Università Carlo Cattaneo – LIUC, CeticCastellanzaItaly
  2. 2.IBM Research, T.J. Watson Research LabsNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations