The AIS Compliance with Law: An Interpretative Framework for Italian Listed Companies

  • K. Corsi
  • D. Mancini


Changes in accounting information systems (AIS) could be triggered by several factors, in this paper the authors consider the mandatory changes required by legislative measures. Previous researches have shown that companies have different behaviors when complying with the same law requirement and that some factors determine the companies’ different ability to seize opportunities coming from legislative acts. In this paper the authors investigate and interpret the impacts of two Italian law (L. 38/05; L. 262/05) on AIS: by checking the accounting technological and organizational impacts, by verifying the effectiveness of behavioral approaches, by identifying the factors that could influence these approaches.


  1. 1.
    Bruns J, Waterhouse JH (1961), The management of innovation, Tavistock, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Woodwoord J (1965), Industrial organization: theory and practice, Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Waterhouse J, Tiessen P (1978), A contingency framework for management accounting system research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 3, 1: 65–76Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Otley D (1980), The contingency theory of management accounting: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5, 4: 413–428Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Otley D (1999), Performance management: a framework for management control research. Management Accounting Research, 10: 363–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langfield-Smith K (1997), Management control system and strategy: a critical review. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 2: 207–232Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chenhall RH (2003), Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28: 127–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jokipii A (2010), Determinants and consequences of internal control in firms: a contingency theory based analysis. Journal Management Governance, 14, 115–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Williamson OE (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York, Free PressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kloot L (1997), Organizational learning and management control systems: responding to environmental change. Management Accounting Research, 8, 1: 47–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Euske KJ, Riccaboni A (1999), Stability to profitability: managing interdependencies to meet a new environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 5/6: 463–481Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Di Maggio PJ, Powell WW (1983), The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corsi K (2008), Il sistema di controllo amministrativo-contabile. Prospettive e dinamiche evolutive alla luce degli IAS/IFRS. Giuffré, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hodgdon C, Tondkar RH, Adhikari A, Harless DW (2009), Compliance with international financial reporting standards and auditor choice: new evidence on the importance of the statutory audit. International Journal of Accounting, 44, 1: 33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ahmed AS, McAnally ML, Rasmussen S, Weaver CD (2010), How costly is the Sarbanes Oxley Act? Evidence on the effects of the Act on corporate profitability. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16, 352–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopwood AG (1987), The Archaeology of Accounting Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12, 3: 207–234Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Burns J (2000), The Dynamics of Accounting Change Inter-Play Between New Practices, Routines, Institutions, Power and Politics. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 13, 5: 566–596Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burns J, Scapens RW (2000), Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: an Institutional Framework. Management Accounting Research, 11, 1: 3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corsi K, Mancini D (2010), The impact of law on accounting information system: an analysis of IAS/IFRS adoption in Italian companies, in D’Atri A., De Marco M., Braccini A.M., Cabiddu F., Management of the Interconnected World, Heidelberg-Germany, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Eisenhardt KM (1989), Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 4: 532–550Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yin R (1994), Case study research. Design and Methods. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ANDAF (2007), Il Dirigente preposto alla redazione dei documenti contabili societari. Analisi, interpretazioni, proposte. Position PaperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SassariSassariItaly
  2. 2.University of Naples ParthenopeNapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations