Skip to main content

Farms in a Modern World: Local Integration and Off-Farm Employment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban-Rural Interactions

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

In particular in remote rural areas, farm households (still) form a significant part of the local population and thus contribute to the vitality of rural settlements. In addition, also in the more urbanized regions, they are important providers of amenities such as the rural landscape, traditions and tranquillity: often called the ‘rural idyll’, In this chapter, first, we explore the economic significance of farms to rural areas by focusing on the local (economic) integration of farms, compared to the local integration of firms of the same size. Furthermore, we will look at farms and different sources of income, to understand how important agricultural production is for the income of farmers in European rural areas today. Because farmers will remain of great importance for maintaining the landscape and (other) cultural heritage aspects, we see off-farm employment as an important contribution to preserving these amenities. Therefore, we also take a closer look at the factors that affect the choice for off-farm employment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We have to keep in mind that the indicator only describes the allocation of sales and purchases of the enterprises that responded to the questionnaire, and not all the enterprises within a certain town.

  2. 2.

    This is in line with results from the ‘Farm Accountancy Data Network’ of LEI, the Hague.

References

  • Boisvert, R. N. & Chang, H. (2006). Does Participation in the conservation reserve program and off-farm work affect the level and distribution of farm household incomes? Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American agricultural economic association annual meetings. Long Beach, CA, July 23–26, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, H., Davidova, S., & Gorton, M. (2004). Agricultural adjustment and the diversification of farm households and corporate farms in Central Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Winters, P., Carletto, G., Covarrubias, K., Quiñones, E. J., Zezza, A., Stamoulis, K., Azzarri, C., & DiGiuseppe, S. (2009). A cross-country comparison of rural income generating activities. World Development, In Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Cornejo (2007). Off-Farm income, Technology adoption, and farm economic performance. Economic Research Report No. ERR-36. United States Department of Agriculture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findeis, J. L., Lass, D. A., & Hallberg, M. C. (1991). Effects of location on off-farm employment decisions. In M. C. Hallberg, J. L. Findeis & D. A. Lass (Eds.), Multiple job-holding among farm families. Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fratesi, U. & Senn, L. (2009). Regional growth, connections and economic modeling: an introduction. In U. Fratesi & L. Senn (Eds.), Growth and innovation of competitive regions, the role of internal and external connections (pp. 3–28). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A. M. (1990). From part-time farming to pluriactivity: a decade of change in rural Europe. Journal of Rural Studies, 6, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, B. L. (2001). How U.S. Agriculture Learned to Grow: Causes and Consequences. Adelaide: Alan Lloyd Address.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, B. K. & Mishra, A. K. (2004). Farming efficiency and the determinants of multiple job holding by farm operators. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86, 722–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B. & Bowler, I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In B. Ilbery (Ed.), The Geography of rural change. Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, A. E., Lidgard, J. M., & Bedford, R. (2001). Dealing with ambiguity: on the interdependence of change in agriculture and rural communities. New Zealand Geographer, 57, 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lass, D. A., Findeis, J. L., & Hallberg, M. C. (1991). Factors affecting the supply of off-farm labor: a review of the empirical evidence. In M. C. Hallberg, J. L. Findeis & D. A. Lass (Eds.), Multiple Job holding among farm families (pp. 263–276). Ames: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobao, L. M. (1990). Locality and inequity: farm and industry structure and socio-economic conditions. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (1998). Theoretical approaches to rural restructuring: economic perspectives. In B. Ilbery (Ed.), The geography of rural change (pp. 13–30). Essex: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meert, H. G. V., Huylenbroeck, T. V., Bourgeois, M., & van Hecke, E. (2005). Farm household survival strategies and diversification on marginal farms. Journal of Rural Studies, 21, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, A. K. & Goodwin, B. K. (1997). Farm income variability and the supply of off-farm labor. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79, 880–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, W., Blunden, G., & Greenwood, J. (1993). The role of family farming in agrarian change. Progress in Human Geography, 17, 22–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. T. (1994). Towards the reconstruction of agriculture: paths of change and adjustment. Professional Geographer, 46, 178–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizov, M. (2005). Pull and push: individual farming in Hungary. Food Policy, 30, 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G. M. (1990). Conflict and change in the countryside. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, J., Joseph, A. E., & Armstrong, M. (2005). Across the divide (?): reconciling farm and town views of agriculture-community linkages. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(3), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, J., Joseph, A. E., & Johnson, P. (2004). Family farming in North Huron County, II: farm–community interactions. The Canadian Geographer, 48(2), 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sofer, M. (2005). The future of family farming in Israel: the second generation in the Moshav. The Geographical Journal, 171(4), 357–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarling, R., Rhodes, J., North, J., & Broom, G. (1993). The economy of rural England, rural development commission, strategy review: topic paper 4. London: RDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, I. (1992). International restructuring of the agri-food chain. In I. R. Bowler, C. R. Bryant & M. D. Nellis (Eds.), Contemporary rural systems in transition: agriculture and environment (Vol. 1, pp. 15–28). Wallingford: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. R., Munton, J. L., & Marsden, T. (1987). Towards a typology of farm business development in advanced capitalist agriculture. Sociologia Ruralis, 27, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, O. (1994). ‘They changed the rules’: farm family responses to agricultural deregulation in Southland, New Zealand. New Zealand Geographer, 50, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post-productivism…and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 77–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woldehanna, T., Lansink, A. O., & Peerlings, J. (2000). Off-farm work decisions on Dutch cash crop farms and the 1992 and Agenda 2000 CAP reforms. Agricultural Economics, 22(2), 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eveline S. van Leeuwen .

Appendices

Appendix 4.1: Integration Indicators for All Areas

See Tables 4.8–4.11

Table 4.8 Integration of the expenditures of small and medium-sized farms in different areas
Table 4.9 Integration of the sales of small and medium-sized farms in different areas
Table 4.10 Integration of the expenditures of small, medium-sized and large firms in different areas
Table 4.11 Integration of the sales of small, medium-sized and large firms in different areas

Appendix 4.2: Absolute Local Expenditures and Sales

See Tables 4.12–4.15

Table 4.12 Absolute average expenditures of small and medium-sized farms in the local area (in 2003 euros)
Table 4.13 Absolute average sales of small and medium-sized farms in the local area (in 2003 euros)
Table 4.14 Absolute average expenditures of small, medium-sized and large firms in the local area (in 2003 euros)
Table 4.15 Absolute average sales of small, medium-sized and large firms in the local area (in 2003 euros)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Leeuwen, E.S. (2010). Farms in a Modern World: Local Integration and Off-Farm Employment. In: Urban-Rural Interactions. Contributions to Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2407-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics