Skip to main content

Evolving Stock Market Efficiency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1122 Accesses

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

Abstract

Understanding the efficiency of emerging stock markets have become important over the last decades as they are now reasonably integrated with developed and world markets. If emerging markets are efficient, both foreign and domestic investors could, when making their investment decisions, consider an asset price to reflect its true fundamental value at all times.

The empirical studies on emerging market efficiency are however very challenging. First, the heterogeneity of these markets in terms of market size and development levels often leads to country-specific results. Second, only a few studies focus on tests of efficient market hypothesis in emerging markets because the majority of them appear to be less efficient than the semi-strong and the strong forms due to numerous market imperfections such as transaction costs, poor quality of information disclosures, thin trading, and inadequate financial and accounting regulations. Finally, their degree of efficiency may evolve though time, which typically reflects different stages of development and gradual process of liberalization.

The purpose of this chapter is to provide a comprehensive review of the efficient market theory and to explore how the market processes information in emerging countries. Specifically, we present a dynamic parameter model that is suitable for characterizing the possibly time-varying pattern of weak form efficiency in emerging stock markets under the gradual effects of market reforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Dimson and Mussavian (1988) for a brief history of market efficiency. The authors also discuss the contributions and inter-linkages between the most influential research articles of the field.

  2. 2.

    From now on the chapter deals with the informational efficiency of stock markets, but the general knowledge is also valid for other segments of financial markets.

  3. 3.

    This categorization is initially due to Fama (1970) and further explained in Fama (1991). The interested readers can refer to these works and references therein for a comprehensive review of the theoretical and empirical developments of the efficiency concepts.

  4. 4.

    Some would use the term for which the local government is able to borrow from both foreign and national residents at a fixed interest rate – and thus the horizon for which investors are willing to commit – as a measure for the time span for which timely and reliable information is available. Then, the longer is the maturity date for a local-currency-denominated government bond, the better is the information reliability and the business environment should be closer to being efficient. Others prefer to focus on the company-specific information to determine the amount of general information released to the market. The used method consists of dividing the total return variance of a company’s listed stock into its market and company-specific variance components. A relatively high proportion of reliable company-specific information compared to the market component of the total risk would lead the market to be more efficient since it indicates that company-specific information is available and relevant in asset pricing.

  5. 5.

    Stock prices can be also modeled by a random walk with drift or time trend.

  6. 6.

    Using Monte Carlo experiments, Zalewska-Mitura and Hall (1999) emphasize that this model is able to detect efficiently shifts in market efficiency with the exception of the first few observations.

  7. 7.

    Errunza (2001) documents an amelioration of some market indicators such as the number of listed companies, trading value, turnover ratio, and market capitalization to GDP ratio posterior to market liberalization. Bekaert and Harvey (1995) considered the trade to GDP ratio as proxy of market openings when testing the time-varying market integration in emerging market countries.

References

  • Aussenegg W (2000) Privatization versus private sector initial public offerings in Poland. Multinational Finance J 4(1–2):69–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelier L (1900) Theory of speculation. In: Cootner P (1964) (Ed.) The random character of stock market prices (pp. 17–78). Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball R, Brown P (1968) An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. J Account Res 6(2):159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banz R (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J Financ Econ 9(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu S (1977) The investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price to earnings ratio: a test of the efficient markets hypothesis. J Finance 32(3):663–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1995) Time-varying world market integration. J Finance 50(2):403–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Harvey CR (2000) Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. J Finance 55(2):565–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert G, Harvey CR, Lundblad C (2007) Liquidity and expected returns: lessons from emerging markets. Rev Financ Stud 20(6):1783–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard V, Thomas J (1989) Post-earnings-announcement drift: delayed price response or risk premium? J Account Res 27(Suppl)):1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. J Econometrics 31(3):307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell J, Shiller R (1988) The dividend-price ratio and expectations of future dividends and discount factors. Rev Financ Stud 1(3):195–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBondt W, Thaler R (1985) Does the stock market overreact? J Finance 40(3):793–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBondt W, Thaler R (1987) Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. J Finance 42(3):557–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimson E, Mussavian M (1988) A brief history of market efficiency. Eur Financ Manag 4(1):91–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of UK inflation. Econometrica 50(4):987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errunza V (2001) Foreign portfolio equity investments, financial liberalization, and economic development. Rev Int Econ 9(4):703–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1965) The behavior of stock market prices. J Bus 38(1):34–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1991) Efficient capital markets. J Finance 46(5):1575–1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, French K (1988) Dividend yields and expected stock returns. J Financ Econ 22(1):3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. J Finance 25(2):383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E, Fisher L, Jensen M, Roll R (1969) The adjustment of stock prices to new information. Int Econ Rev 10(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine P, Nguyen DK (2006) Stock market liberalization and informational efficiency in emerging markets: new consideration and tests. Bankers, Markets and Investors 84:6–17

    Google Scholar 

  • French K (1980) Stock returns and the weekend effect. J Financ Econ 8(1):55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewold N, Ariff M (1998) The effects of de-regulation on share market efficiency in the Asia-Pacific. Int Econ J 12(4):23–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey CR (1995) Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets. Rev Financ Stud 8(3):773–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry PB (2000) Stock market liberalization, economic reform and emerging market equity prices. J Finance 55(2):529–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibbotson RG (1975) Price performance of common stock new issues. J Financ Econ 2(3):232–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe J (1974) The effect of regulation changes on insider trading. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 5(1):93–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferis K, Smith G (2005) The changing efficiency of African stock markets. S Afr J Econ 73(1):54–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegadeesh N, Titman S (1993) Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. J Finance 48(1):65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeng LA, Metrick A, Zeckhauser R (1999) The profits to insider trading: a performance-evaluation perspective. NBER Working Paper No. 6913

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M (1969) Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment portfolios. J Bus 42(2):167–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Ruback RS (1983) The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. J Financ Econ 11(1–4):5–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawakatsu H, Morey MR (1999) Financial liberalization and stock market efficiency: an empirical examination of nine emerging market countries. J Multinational Financ Manag 9(3–4):353–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim EH, Singal V (2000) Stock market openings: experience of emerging economies. J Bus 73(1):25–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1994) Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. J Finance 49(5):1541–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X-M (2003) Time-varying informational efficiency in China’s A-share and B-share markets. J Chinese Econ Bus Stud 1(1):33–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollah AS (2007) Testing weak-form efficiency in emerging market: evidence from Botswana stock exchange. Int J Theor Appl Finance 10(6):1077–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockinger M, Urga G (2000) The evolution of stock markets in transition economies. J Comp Econ 28(3):456–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff M, Kinney W (1976) Capital market seasonality: the case of stock returns. J Financ Econ 3(4):370–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozeff MS, Zaman MA (1988) Market efficiency and insider trading: new evidence. J Bus 61(1):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson P (1965) Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Ind Manag Rev 6(2):41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalewska-Mitura A, Hall SG (1999) Examining the first stages of market performance: a test for evolving market efficiency. Econ Lett 64(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarowin P (1989) Short-run market overreaction: size and seasonality effects. J Portfolio Manag 15(3):26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed El Hedi Arouri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arouri, M.E.H., Jawadi, F., Nguyen, D.K. (2010). Evolving Stock Market Efficiency. In: The Dynamics of Emerging Stock Markets. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2389-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics