Leader–Member Exchange Theory

Chapter
Part of the Contributions to Management Science book series (MANAGEMENT SC.)

Abstract

The Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) theory first emerged in the 1970s. It conceptualizes leadership as a process of interaction between leader and follower and centers on the dyadic exchange relationships between both. The leader–follower relationships within work groups are split up into a set of working relationships between a leader and the various members of the work team (Van Breukelen et al. 2006) since it is assumed that different relationships between the leader and every single follower develop. Hence, the leader may have different types of transactions and different kinds of relations with different followers (Van Seters and Field 1990). “For example, each superior may offer one subordinate a substantial amount of interpersonal support and attention … while at the same time he or she offers a second subordinate less support” (Dansereau et al. 1982, p. 84). Following Blau’s (1964) writings on social and economic exchange, LMX theory assumes that leaders and followers are involved in an exchange relationship. Followers follow because they receive something from the leader. In turn, leaders lead as they get something from followers (Messick 2004). Hence, the quality of the exchange relationship is the basic unit of analysis (Van Breukelen et al. 2006). The theoretical approach basically grounds in the writings of Graen (1976), Dansereau et al. (1975), as well as Graen and Cashman (1975). To date, the theory has undergone several stages of development; a first stage where the idea of vertical dyadic linkages was elaborated, a second stage that concentrated on the effects of linkages regarding different exchange qualities, a third stage that deals with the development of dyadic leader–member exchange relationships (the life cycle of leadership making), and a fourth and so far final stage that expands the ideas of the concept to groups and networks (Graen and Uhl-Bien 1995). This chapter does not follow this four-stage development but offers a simpler division into early studies on LMX theory, reflecting the first and second stages described by Graen and Uhl-Bien, and later publications, demonstrating the normative turn in the theory, and concentrating on the development of high-quality leader–member exchange relations (see also Northouse 2004).

References

  1. Bauer T, Green S (1996) Development of leader-member exchange: a longitudinal test. Acad Manage J 39(6):1538–1567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blau PM (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Dansereau F Jr, Alutto JA, Markham SE, Dumas M (1982) Multiplexed supervision and leadership: an application of within and between analysis. In: Hunt JG, Sekaran U, Schriesheim CA (eds) Leadership beyond established views. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, pp 81–103Google Scholar
  4. Dansereau F, Graen GG, Haga W (1975) A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership in formal organizations – a longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organ Behav Hum Perform 13(1):46–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dienesch RM, Liden RC (1986) Leader–Member exchange model of leadership: a critique and further development. Acad Manage Rev 11(3):618–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duarte NT, Goodson JR, Klich NR (1994) Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Acad Manage J 37(3):499–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duchon D, Green SG, Taber TD (1986) Vertical dyad linkage: a longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. J Appl Psychol 71(1):56–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Epitropaki O, Martin R (2005) From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol 90(4):659–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerstner CR, Day DV (1997) Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: correlates and construct issues. J Appl Psychol 82(6):827–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Graen GB (1976) Role-making processes within complex organizations. In: Dunnette MD (ed) Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 1202–1245Google Scholar
  11. Graen GB, Cashman J (1975) A role making model on formal organizations: a developmental approach. In: Hunt JG, Larson LL (eds) Leadership frontiers. Kent State University Press, Kent, OH, pp 143–165Google Scholar
  12. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1991) The transformation of professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributions: toward a theory of leader making. J Manage Syst 3(3):33–48Google Scholar
  13. Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadersh Q 6(2):219–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Green SG, Anderson SE, Shivers SL (1996) Demographic and organizational influences on leader-member exchange and related work attitudes. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 66(2):203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson DJ, Wayne SJ, Bommer WH, Shore LM, Tetrick LE (2008) Leader-member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: a multilevel examination. J Appl Psychol 93(6):1208–1219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollander EP (1980) Leadership and social exchange processes. In: Gergen KJ, Greenberg MS, Willis RH (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum, New York, pp 103–118Google Scholar
  17. Huang X, Wright RP, Chiu WCK, Wang C (2008) Relational schemas as sources of evaluation and misevaluation of leader–member exchanges: some initial evidence. Leadersh Q 19(3):266–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liden RC, Graen GB (1980) Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Acad Manage J 23(3):451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liden RC, Maslyn JM (1998) Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: an empirical assessment through scale development. J Manage 24(1):43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Liden RC, Wayne SJ, Stilwell D (1993) A longitudinal study on the early development of leader-member exchange. J Appl Psychol 78(4):662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Messick DM (2004) On the psychological exchange between leaders and followers. In: Messick DM, Kramer RM (eds) The psychology of leadership. New perspectives and research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 81–96Google Scholar
  22. Mumford MD, Dansereau F, Yammarino FJ (2000) Followers, motivations, and levels of analysis: the case of individualized leadership. Leadersh Q 11(2):313–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Ilies R (2009) The development of leader–member exchanges: exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108(2):256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Northouse PG (1997) Leadership. Theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  25. Northouse PG (2004) Leadership. Theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  26. Rousseau DM (1998) LMX meets the psychological contract: looking inside the black box of leader-member exchange. In: Dansereau F, Yammarino FJ (eds) Leadership: the multiple-level approaches. Contemporary and alternative. JAI-Press, Stamford, CT, pp 149–154Google Scholar
  27. Schyns B, Croon MA (2006) A model of task demands, social structure, and leader-member exchange and their relationship to job satisfaction. Int J Hum Res Manage 17(4):602–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schyns B, Kroon B, Moors G (2008) Follower characteristics and the perception of leader-member exchange. J Manage Psychol 23(7):772–788Google Scholar
  29. Settoon RP, Bennett N, Liden RC (1996) Social exchange in organizations: perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity. J Appl Psychol 81(3):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sparrowe RT (1994) Empowerment in the hospitality industry: an exploration of antecedents and outcomes. Hosp Res J 17(3):51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sparrowe RT, Liden RC (1997) Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Acad Manage Rev 22(2):522–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steiner DD (1997) Attributions in leader-member exchanges: implications for practice. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 6(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Breukelen W, Schyns B, Le Blanc P (2006) Leader-member exchange theory and research. Accomplishments and future challenges. Leadership 2(3):295–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Seters DA, Field RHG (1990) The evolution of leadership theory. J Organ Change Manage 3(3):29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yukl GA (1994) Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. Border Region StudiesUniversity of Southern DenmarkSønderborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations