Skip to main content

Attribution Theory in Leadership Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Leadership Theories

Part of the book series: Contributions to Management Science ((MANAGEMENT SC.))

  • 7681 Accesses

Abstract

Attribution theory is basically dealing with the formation of individual opinions about the reasons of particular events or observations. This also includes opinions about the behavior of other people and about oneself. Attribution theory is usually seen as originating from the work of Heider (1958), Jones and Davis (1965) as well as Kelley (1967, 1972, 1973). It is argued that ordinary people use methods of ascribing reasons to observed events that are similar to the inductive approach used in scientific research. They try to identify the reasons for observed incidents and actions by collecting information which might be helpful for explaining them. More generally, in our everyday life we are constantly trying to form chains of cause and effect that link observed incidents (e.g., a traffic accident or a nervous breakdown of a colleague) and experiences (e.g., failing an exam) to possible reasons. Consequently, attributions are understood to play a crucial role in human categorization processes and, thus, in the reduction of ambiguity. By attributing causes to effects, observed or experienced incidents are linked to certain stimulus categories of the world in our mind. Hence, attributions provide order and increase the ability of a person to understand his/her own behavior and that of others. By linking incidents and actions to concrete reasons, they are interpreted and arranged by the observer. Based on this fact, the individual is then able to determine his/her own behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashkanasy NM (1989) Causal attributions and supervisors’ response to subordinate performance. The Green and Mitchell model revisited. J Appl Soc Psychol 19(4):309–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy NM (1995) Supervisory attributionsand evaluative judgements of subordinate performance. A further test of the Green an Mitchell model. In: Martinko MJ (ed) Attribution theory. An organizational perspective. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, pp 211–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayman-Nolley S, Ayman R (2005) Children’s implicit theory of leadership. In: Schyns B, Meindl JR (eds) Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 227–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass BM (1995) Comment: transformational leadership. J Manag Inquiry 4(3):293–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bligh MC, Schyns B (2007) Leading question: the romance lives on: contemporary issues surrounding the romance of leadership. Leadership 3(3):343–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DJ, Scott KA, Lewis H (2004) Information processing and leadership. In: Antonakis J, Ciancolo AT, Sternberg RJ (eds) The nature of leadership. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 125–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder BJ (1977) An attribution theory of leadership. In: Staw BM, Salancik GR (eds) New directions in organizational behavior. St. Clair Press, Chicago, pp 179–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog DN, House RJ, Hanges PJ, Ruiz-Quintanilla SA, Dorfman PW (1999) Culture specific and cross-culturally generalizable implicit leadership theories: are attributes of charismatic/ transformational leadership universally endorsed? Leadersh Q 10(2):219–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden D, Leviatan U (1975) Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. J Appl Psychol 60(6):736–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emrich CG (1999) Context effects in leadership perception. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(8):991–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle EM, Lord RG (1997) Implicit theories, self-schemas, and leader-member exchange. Acad Manage J 40(4):988–1010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki O, Martin R (2005) From ideal to real: a longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol 90(4):659–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman JM (1981) Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J Appl Psychol 66(2):127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felfe J (2005) Personality and romance of leadership. In: Schyns B, Meindl JR (eds) Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 199–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SG, Mitchell TR (1979) Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organ Behav Hum Perform 23(3):429–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt CL (2008) Leader-Follower relations. In: Marturano A, Gosling J (eds) Leadership. The key concepts. Routledge, London, pp 90–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RL, Ginnett RC, Curphy GJ (1996) Leadership. Enhancing the lessons of experience. Irwin, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt JG, Boal KB, Dodge GE (1999) The effects of visionary and crisis-responsive charisma on followers: an exerimental examination of two kinds of charismatic leadership. Leadersh Q 10(3):423–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Davis KE (1965) From acts to dispositions. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic, New York, pp 219–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Nisbett RE (1987) The actor and the obsever: divergent perceptions of the causes of behaviour. In: Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valins S, Weiner B (eds) Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 79–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller T (1999) Images of the familiar: individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadersh Q 10(4):589–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1967) Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Levine D (ed) Nebraska symposium on motivation. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 192–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1971) Attribution in social interaction. General Learning Press, Morristown, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1972) Causal schemata and the attribution process. In: Jones E, Kanouse D, Kelley H, Nisbett R, Valins S, Weiner B (eds) Attribution: perceiving causes of behavior. General Learning Press, Morristown, pp 151–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1973) The process of causal attribution. Am Psychol 28(2):107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney RA, Blascovich J, Shaver PR (1994) Implicit leadership theories for new leaders. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 15(4):409–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad E (2000) Implicit leadership theories in Eastern and Western Europe. Soc Sci Inform 39(2):335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus G, Gemmill G (1990) Idiosyncratic effects of implicit theories of leadership. Psychol Rep 66(1):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Foti RJ (1986) Schema theories, information processing, and organizational behavior. In: Sims HP Jr, Gioia DA (eds) The thinking organization. Dynamics of organizational social cognition. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 20–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Foti RJ, DeVader C (1984) A test of leadership categorization theory: internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organ Behav Hum Perform 34(3):343–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Maher KJ (1990) Perceptions of leadership and their implications in organizations. In: Carroll JS (ed) Applied social psychology and organizational settings. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 129–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Maher KJ (1993) Leadership and information processing: linking perceptions to performance. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord RG, Smith JE (1983) Theoretical, informational, information processing, and situational factor affecting attributional theories of organizational behavior. Acad Manage Rev 8(1):50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher KJ (1997) Gender-related stereotypes of transformational and transactional leadership. Sex Roles 37(3/4):209–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko MJ, Gardner WL (1982) Learned helplessness: an alternative explanation for performance deficits. Acad Manage Rev 7(2):413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko MJ, Gardner WL (1987) The leader/member attribution process. Acad Manage Rev 12(2):235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Douglas SC (2007) The role, function, and contobution of attribution theory to leadership. A review. Leadersh Q 18(6):561–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy JC (1982) A typology of attribution leadership research. Acad Manage Rev 7(3):413–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy JC, Hunger JD (1987) Leadership theory as causal attributions of performance. In: Hunt JG, Baliga BR, Dachler HP, Schriesheim CA (eds) Emerging leadership vistas. Lexington Books, Lexington, pp 169–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Medvedeff ME, Lord RG (2006) Implicit leadership theories as dynamic processing structures. In: Shamir B, Pillai R, Bligh MC, Uhl-Bien M (eds) Follower-centered perspectives on leadership: a tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, pp 19–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl JR (1990) On leadership: an alternative to the conventional wisdom. In: Cummings TG, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behaviour. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 159–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Meindl JR, Ehrlich SB, Dukerich JM (1985) The romance of leadership. Adm Sci Q 30(1):78–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TR, Green SB, Wood RE (1981) An attributional model of leadership and the poor performing subordinate. Development and validation. In: Cummings TG, Staw BM (eds) Research in organizational behaviour. JAI-Press, Greenwich, CT, pp 197–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TR, Wood RE (1980) Supervisors’ responses to subordinate poor performance. A test of an attributional model. Organ Behav Hum Perform 25(1):123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller A, Schyns B (2005) The perception of leadership – leadership as perception: an exploration using the repertory grid-technique. In: Schyns B, Meindl JR (eds) Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 81–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger O (1995) Führen und Geführt werden [To lead and to be led]. Ferdinand Enke, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger O (2002) Führen und führen lassen. Ansätze, Ergebnisse und Kritik der Führungsforschung [To lead and to let lead. Approaches, findings and critique of leadership research]. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Offermann LR, Kennedy JK Jr, Wirtz PW (1994) Implicit leadership theories – Content, structure and generalizability. Leadersh Q 50(1):31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J (1977) The ambiguity of leadership. Acad Manage Rev 2(1):104–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillai R (1996) Crisis and the emergence of charismatic leadership in groups: an experimental investigation. J Appl Soc Psychol 26(6):543–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schyns B, Meindl JR (2005) An overview of implicit leadership theories and their application in organization practice. In: Schyns B, Meindl JR (eds) Implicit leadership theories – essays and explorations. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, pp 15–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir B (1995) Social distance and charisma: theoretical notes and and exploratory study. Leadersh Q 6(1):19–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaver KG (1985) The attribution of blame. Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B, Frieze I, Kukla A, Reed L, Rest S, Rosenbaum RM (1987) Perceiving the causes of success and failure. In: Jones EE, Kanouse DE, Kelley HH, Nisbett RE, Valins S, Weiner B (eds) Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 95–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagil D (1998) Charismatic leadership and organizational hierarchy: attribution of charisma to close and distant leaders. Leadersh Q 9(2):161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl GA (2006) Leadership in organizations. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein R, Lord RG (2004) Implicit leadership theories. In JM Burns, K Cho, GR Goethals, GJ Sorenson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Leadership (pp. 700–706). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Winkler .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Winkler, I. (2010). Attribution Theory in Leadership Research. In: Contemporary Leadership Theories. Contributions to Management Science. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2158-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics