Skip to main content

Drivers and Inhibitors of Countries’ Broadband Performance – A European Snapshot

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

There is large variance regarding diffusion of broadband Internet among European countries. Some nations are criticised for a presumably underdeveloped broadband market. This study analyses broadband Internet access take-up using a wide range of variables to explain European countries’ broadband position and to anticipate future market developments. Correlation results for the EU-25 countries are presented using a time lag design of introducing the influencing variables for the year 2003 and the outcome criteria for 2005/2006. Findings show that (1) economic prosperity and (2) computer literacy initiate broadband penetration differences. Further, strong effects are identified for (3) English language proficiency, which affects the attractiveness of global Web content for Internet subscribers, (4) teleworking, which increases the base of potential early broadband adopters, (5) service sector employment that positively correlates with the need for information access, and (6) unemployment, which reduces the spending power of consumers. Privatisation, independent regulator, and LLU lead times have a significant positive impact on broadband development, while intra-technology and general market concentration are negatively associated with broadband uptake. Inter-technology (e.g., Cable vs. DSL) competition is not significant for broadband take-up in the EU-25 sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1 “Broadband” is used for any Internet access technology that provides faster data transfer than traditional dial-up connections by using higher bandwidth and some form of packet switching and “always on” capability. Cf. Bauer et al. (2003, p. 4), Gerpott (2007, p. 799), Maldoom et al. (2005, p. 3). Commonly, DSL (Digital Subscriber Line), Cable, Fixed Wireless, Satellite, third generation mobile, and fiber-to-the-home are technologies discussed as broadband Internet access platforms. Cf. Distaso et al. (2006, pp. 89–90), Maldoom et al. (2005, pp. 11–24), Papacharissi and Zaks (2006, pp. 65–67). DSL and (in some countries) cable are by far the dominant broadband technologies today.

  2. 2.

    2 Benefits of broadband are usually debated qualitatively (cf. Bauer et al. 2003, p. 3; Frieden 2005, pp. 596–599; Maldoom et al. 2005, pp. 8–11) but are seldomly quantified (cf. Lehr et al. 2006).

  3. 3.

    3 A comprehensive summary of the literature is provided in Gerpott (2007, pp. 801–805); see also Bauer et al. (2003, pp. 9–10) for additional references.

  4. 4.

    4 In turn, broadband is also hoped to positively impact economic development (cf. the discussion of broadband benefits by Bauer et al. (2002), Chinn and Fairlie (2007), Lehr et al. (2006, pp. 4–6), European Commission (2006a)).

  5. 5.

    5 Additional socio-demographic characteristics cited in micro-level studies of broadband adoption (e.g., age, gender, residence area, ethnic group, income, or education, cf. Chaudhuri and Flamm 2005; Gerpott 2007) have also been analysed at an aggregate level across countries (see partially Cava-Ferreruela and Alabau-Muñoz 2004, pp. 6–10; Chinn and Fairlie 2007, pp. 30–35) but are neglected here.

  6. 6.

    6 Alternative definitions of penetration, particularly with different baselines, e.g., households or people aged 14 to 65, are highly overlapping (correlations exceeding r = 0.98). Therefore, the inclusion of additional common broadband indicators with low differentiation is not taken up.

References

  • Arthur D. Little (2007) Germany’s Broadband Performance in Comparison to Other European Countries. Duesseldorf: Arthur D. Little GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J M (2003) Prospects and limits of comparative research in communications policy-making. Paper presented at the 31st Annual TPRC Communication, Information and Internet Policy Conference, Arlington, VA, September 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J M et al (2002) Broadband: Benefits and Policy Challenges. A Quello Center Report. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer J M, Kim J H, Wildman S S (2003) Broadband uptake in OECD countries: Policy lessons and unexplained patterns. Paper presented at the 14th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, Helsinki, Finland, August 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cava-Ferreruela I, Alabau-Muñoz A (2004) Key constraints and drivers for broadband development: A cross-national empirical analysis. Paper presented at the 15th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society, Berlin, Germany, September 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A, Flamm K (2005) An analysis of the determinants of broadband access. Paper presented at The Future of Broadband: Wired & Wireless? UFL-LBS Workshop, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, February 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn M D, Fairlie R W (2007) The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and internet penetration. Oxford Economic Papers 59: 16–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekimpe M G, Parker P M, Sarvary M (2000) Global diffusion of technological innovations: A coupled-hazard approach. Journal of Marketing Research 37(2): 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Luque M S, Javidan M (2004) Uncertainty avoidance. In: House R Culture, Leadership, and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 602–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Distaso W, Lupi P, Manenti F M (2006) Platform competition and broadband uptake: Theory and empirical evidence from the European union. Information Economics and Policy 18: 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECTA (2006) Regulatory Scorecard. Brussels: European Competitive Telecommunications Association/Jones Day/SPC Networks.

    Google Scholar 

  • EITO (2007) European Information Technology Observatory. Frankfurt a.M.: EITO.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2002) eEurope 2005: An Information Society for All. Action plan presented in view of the Sevilla European Council, June 21–22, 2002 (COM 263). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005): i2010 – A European Information Society for Growth and Employment (COM 229). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006a): Bridging the Broadband Gap (COM 129). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006b) Broadband Access in the EU: Situation at 1 July 2006 (COCOM 06–29). Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006c) Special Eurobarometer 249: E-Communications Household Survey. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden R (2005) Lessons from broadband development in Canada, Japan, Korea and the United States. Telecommunications Policy 29, 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Murillo M (2005): International Broadband Deployment: The Impact of Unbundling. Communications & Strategies 57, 83–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerpott T J (2007) Einflussfaktoren der Adoption eines Breitbandanschlusses durch Privatkunden. In: Hausladen I (ed.) Management am Puls der Zeit – Band 1: Unternehmensführung. Munich: TCW Transfer-Centrum: 797–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s Consequences. 2nd Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakopin N M (2006) Einflussfaktoren des Internationalisierungserfolgs von Mobilfunknetzbetreibern. Wiesbaden: DUV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakopin N M, Von den Hoff K (2007) Breitbandmarktentwicklung in Deutschland – Eine indikatorpluralistische Betrachtung. Ifo Schnelldienst 60 (21): 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • JP Morgan Chase (2006) The fibre battle – Changing dynamics in European wireline. European Equity Research. London: JP Morgan Chase.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr W H et al. (2006) Measuring Broadband’s Economic Impact. Paper presented at the 33rd Research Conference on Communication, Information, and Internet Policy (TPRC), September 23–25, 2005, Arlington, VA (revised in January 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldoom D et al (2005) Broadband in Europe. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miralles F (2006) Efficiency of Public Promotions Policies in the Diffusion of Broadband Networks. An Exploratory Analysis. Presented to the 34th Research Conference on Communication, Information, and Internet Policy, Arlington, VA. September 29, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) OECD Broadband Statistics to December 2006. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi Z, Zaks A (2006) Is broadband the future? An analysis of broadband technology potential and diffusion. Telecommunications Policy 30: 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polykalas S E, Vlachos K G (2006) Broadband penetration and broadband competition: Evidence and analysis in the EU market. Info 8 (6): 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist S, Frank L, Puumalainen K (2005) The effects of country characteristics, cultural similarity and adoption timing on the diffusion of wireless communications. Journal of Business Research 58: 107–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner S D (2006) Why does the U.S. lag behind? Broadband penetration in the member nations of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten S (2006) Broadband and Unbundling Regulations in OECD Countries. Working Paper 06-16. Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center For Regulatory Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallsten S (2007) Towards Effective U.S. Broadband Policies. Washington, DC: The Progress & Freedom Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jakopin, N.M. (2009). Drivers and Inhibitors of Countries’ Broadband Performance – A European Snapshot. In: Curwen, P., Haucap, J., Preissl, B. (eds) Telecommunication Markets. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2082-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics