Skip to main content

The Impact of Functional Complexity on Open Source Maintenance Costs: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis

  • Conference paper
Interdisciplinary Aspects of Information Systems Studies
  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

It is well known that software complexity affects the maintenance costs of proprietary software. In the Open Source (OS) context, the sharing of development and maintenance effort among developers is a fundamental tenet, which can be thought as a driver to reduce the impact of complexity on maintenance costs. However, complexity is a structural property of code, which is not quantitatively accounted for in traditional cost models. We introduce the concept of functional complexity, which weights the well-established cyclomatic complexity metric to the number of interactive functional elements that an application provides to users. The goal of this paper is to analyze how Open Source maintenance costs are affected by functional complexity: we posit that costs are influenced by higher levels of functional complexity, and traditional cost models, like CoCoMo, do not properly take into account the impact of functional complexity on maintenance costs. Analyses are based on quality, complexity and cost data collected for 906 OS application versions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banker, R., Datar, S., Kemerer, C., and Zweig, D. (1993). Software complexity and mainte-nance costs. Comm. ACM vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 81-94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Paulson, J.W., Succi, G., and Eberlein, A. (2004). An empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 246-256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Emerson, T.J. (1984). Program testing, path coverage and the cohesion metric. In: Proc. COMPSAC84, pp. 421-431.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Longworth, H.D., Ottenstein, L.M., and Smith, M.R. (1986). The relationship between pro-gram complexity and slice complexity during debugging tasks. In: Proc. COMPSAC86, pp. 383-389.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chidamber, S. and Kemerer, C. (1994). A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol. 20, pp. 476-493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brito e Abreu, F. (1995). The MOOD metrics set. In: Proc. ECOOP Workshop on Metrics.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gyimothy, T., Ferenc, R., and Siket, I. (2005). Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol. 31, pp. 897-910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, Y., Kuan Tan, H.B., and Zhang, W. (2003). Software cost estimation through conceptual requirement. Proc. Int. Conf. Quality Software vol. 1, pp. 141-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boehm, B., Brown, A.W., Madacy, R., and Yang, Y. (2004). A software product line life cycle cost estimation model. Proc. Int. Symp. Empirical Software Eng. vol. 1, pp. 156-164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kemerer, C.F. (1987). An empirical validation of software cost estimation models. Comm. ACM vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 416-430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Briand, L.C., El Emam, K., Surmann, D., Wiezczorek, I., and Maxwell, K.D. (1999). An assessment and comparison of common software cost estimation modeling techniques. Proc. Int. Conf. Software Eng. vol. 1, pp. 313-323.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cocomo official website (http://sunset.usc.edu/research/cocomoii/index.html).

  13. McCabe, T.J. (1976). A complexity measure. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Software Engineering, vol. 1, p. 407.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boehm, B. (1981). Software Engineering Economics. Prentice-Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Howison, J. and Crowston, K. (2004). The perils and pitfalls of mining SourceForge. In: Proc. Int. Workshop Mining Software Repositories, pp. 7-12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pawlak, R. and Spoon (2005). Annotation-driven program transformation - the AOP case. In: Proc. Workshop on Aspect-Orientation for Middleware Development, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chan, T., Chung, S., and Ho, T. (1996). An economic model to estimate software rewriting and replacement times. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 580-598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fowler, M., Beck, K., Brant, J., Opdyke, W., and Roberts, D. (2001). Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Raymond, E.S. (2004). The Art of Unix Programming. Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Capra, E., Merlo, F. (2008). The Impact of Functional Complexity on Open Source Maintenance Costs: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis. In: Interdisciplinary Aspects of Information Systems Studies. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2010-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics