Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1 pp 93–118Cite as

Semiotics and Computational Linguistics

On Semiotic Cognitive Information Processing

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 33))

Abstract

Signs, which are the domain of inquiry in semiotics, have a complex ontology. Apart from being used—adequate knowledge provided—by communicators, and recognized as being decomposable into smaller elements and aggregatable to larger structures, they are also meant to be understood. This is a consequence of their manifold identity as compound physical objects with real world extensions in space-time-locations and as activators for complex mental processes which tend to be identified with some mind and/or brain activities responsible for their understanding. In the cognitive sciences all processes of perception, identification, and interpretation of (external) structures are considered information processing which (natural or artificial) systems—due to their own (internal) structuredness or knowledge—are able (or unable) to perform. Combining the semiotic with the cognitive paradigm in computational linguistics, the processes believed to constitute natural language sign structures and their understanding is modeled by way of procedural, i.e. computational (re-)constructions of such processes that produce structures comparable to those that the understanding of (very large) samples of situated natural language discourse would imply. Thus, computational semiotic models in cognitive linguistics aim at simulating the constitution of meanings and the interpretation of signs without their predicative and propositional representations which dominate traditional research formats in syntax and semantics so far. This is achieved by analyzing the linear or syntagmatic and selective or paradigmatic constraints which natural languages impose recursively on the formation and structure of (strings of) linguistic entities on different levels of systemic distinction. It will be argued (and illustrated) that fuzzy modeling allows to derive more adequate representational means whose (numerical) specificity and (procedural) definiteness may complement formats of categorial type precision (which would appear phenomenologically incompatible) and processual determinateness (which would seem cognitively inadequate). Several examples from fuzzy linguistic research will be given to illustrate these points.

Revised version of a paper presented at the Pre-ISAS Tutorials of the Intelligent Systems and Semiotics conference, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Ma. USA, on September 22–25, 1997

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Armstrong-Warwick (ed): Using Large Corpora I & II. Special Issues: Computational Linguistics, 19:1 & 2. MIT Press for ACL, Boston, MA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Barwise/ J. Perry: Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Briscoe/ J. Carroll: Generalized Probabilstic LR Parsing of Natural Language (Corpora) with Unification-Based Grammars. Computational Linguistics, 1993 (1): 25–59, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Brown/ S. DellaPietra/ V. DellaPietra/ R. Mercer: The Mathematics of Statistical Machine Translation: Parameter Eestimation. Computational Linguistics, 1993(2):263–311.

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. E. Brown: A statistical approach to language translation. In: D. Vargha (ed): COLING-88 Budapest, ICCL, J.v.Neumann Society of Computing Science. Budapest 1988, pp. 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Bunke (ed): Advances in Structural and Syntactic Pattern Recognition. World Scientific, Singapore, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. A. Carpenter/ S. Grossberg (eds): Pattern Recognition by Self- Organizing Neural Networks. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Chomsky: Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. (Current Studies in Linguistics 16 ). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Chomsky: The Minimalist Program. (Current Studies in Linguistics 28 ). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Church: A stochastic parts program and noun phrase parser for unrestricted text. In: Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, ACL, Austin, TX, 1988, pp. 136–143.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. K. W. Church/ P. Hanks: Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics,1990(1):22–29.

    Google Scholar 

  12. K. W. Church/ R. L. Mercer: Introduction to the Special Issue on Computational Linguistics Using Large Corpora. Computational Linguistics,1993(1):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Fodor/ Z. Pylyshyn: Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition,1988(28):3–71.

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Fucks: On Nahordnung and Fernordnung in samples of literary texts. Biometrica,1954(2):116–132.

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Hindle/ M. Rooth: Structural Ambiguity and Lexical Relations. Computational Linguistics,1993(1):103–120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. Hinton (ed): Connectionist Symbol Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Köhler/ B. Rieger (eds): Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics. Proceedings 1st Quantitative Linguistics Conference — QUALICO-91. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. Lorch: Priming and search processes in semantic memory: a test of three models of spreading activation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,1982(21):468–492.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Meystel: Semiotic Modeling and Situation Analysis: an Introduction. AdRem Inc, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Nadel/ L. Cooper/ P. Culicover/ R. Harnish (eds): Neural Connections, Mental Computation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. S. Peirce: Pragmatism in Retrospect: A Last Formulation. In: J. Buchler (ed): The Philosophical Writings of Peirce, Dover, New York, 1906, pp. 269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Pfeiffer/ Z. Schreter/ F. Fogelman-Soulié/ L. Steels (eds): Connection-ism in Perspective. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Prim: Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell Systems Technical Journal,1957(36):1389–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. Rieger: Theoretische Grundlagen der Computerlinguistik: eine Paneldiskussion mit M. Bierwisch, C. Habel, B. Rieger, H. Uszkoreit und W. Wahlster. In: I. Batori/ U. Hahn/ M. Pinkal/ W. Wahlster (eds): Computerlinguistik und ihre theoretischen Grundlagen, (KI—InformatikFachberichte Bd. 195 ). Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg/ NewYork, 1988, pp. 192–218.

    Google Scholar 

  25. B. Rieger: Unscharfe Semantik: zur numerischen Modellierung vager Bedeutungen von Wörtern als fuzzy Mengen. In: H. Friemel/ G. MüllerSchönberger/ A. Schutt (eds): Forum-90: Wissenschaft und Technik. Neue Anwendungen mit Hilfe aktueller Computertechnologien, (Informatik-Fachberichte Bd. 259 ). Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg/ NewYork, 1990, pp. 80–104.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Rieger: Fuzzy Modellierung linguistischer Kategorien. In: W. Feldmann/ H. Hinrichs (eds): Text und Lexikon, (Lexicographica Series Maior 73 ). Niemeyer, Tübingen, 1996, pp. 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. Rieger: Warum Fuzzy Linguistik? Überlegungen und Ansätze einer cornputerlinguistischen Neuorientierung. In: D. Krallmann/ W. Schmitz (eds): Internationales Gerold-Ungeheuer-Symposium, Nodus Verlag, Münster, 1998, pp. 153–18.

    Google Scholar 

  28. B. B. Rieger: Feasible Fuzzy Semantics. On some problems of how to handle word meaning empirically. In: H. Eikmeyer/ H. Rieser (eds): Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, (Research in Text Theory 6). de Gruyter, Berlin/ NewYork, 1981, pp. 193–209.

    Google Scholar 

  29. B. B. Rieger: Fuzzy Representation Systems in Linguistic Semantics. In: R. Trappl/ N. Findler/ W. Horn (eds): Progress in Cybernetics and Systems Research, Vol. XI. McGraw-Hill Intern., Washington/ New York/ London, 1982, pp. 249–256

    Google Scholar 

  30. B. B. Rieger: Clusters in Semantic Space. In: L. Delatte (ed): Actes du Congrès International Informatique et Science Humaines. Laboratoire d’Analyse Statistique des Langues Anciennes, LASLA, Liège, 1983, pp. 805–814.

    Google Scholar 

  31. B. B. Rieger: Generating Dependency Structures of Fuzzy Word Meanings in Semantic Space. In: S. Hattori/ K. Iounu (eds): Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists. Comité International Permanent des Linguistes, CIPL. Tokyo, 1983, pp. 543–548.

    Google Scholar 

  32. B. B. Rieger: Semantic Relevance and Aspect Dependancy in a Given Subject Domain. In: D. Walker (ed): COLING-84 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, International Committee of Computational Linguistics, ACL-ICCL. Stanford, 1984, pp. 298–301.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. B. B. Rieger: Inducing a Relevance Relation in a Distance-like Data Structure of Fuzzy Word Meaning Representations. In: R. Allen (ed): Data Bases in the Humanities and Social Sciences. 4th International Conference on Data Bases in the Humanities and Social Sciences, Paradigm Press, Osprey, FL, 1985, pp. 374–386.

    Google Scholar 

  34. B. B. Rieger: Lexical Relevance and Semantic Disposition. On stereotype word meaning representation in procedural semantics. In: G. Hoppenbrouwes/ P. Seuren/ T. Weijters (eds): Meaning and the Lexicon. Foris Publications, Dordrecht, 1985, pp. 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  35. B. B. Rieger: Distributed Semantic Representation of Word Meanings. In: J. D. Becker/ I. Eisele/ F. W. Mündemann (eds): Parallelism, Learning, Evolution. Evolutionary Models and Strategies, WOPPLOT-89, (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 565 ). Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg/ New York, 1991, pp. 243–273.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. B. B. Rieger: On Distributed Representation in Word Semantics. (ICSITechnical Report TR-91–012), International Computer Science Institute. Berkeley, CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  37. B. B. Rieger: Meaning Acquisition by SCIPS. In: B. M. Ayyub (ed): ISUMA-NAFIPS-95, IEEE-Transactions: Joint Intern. Conf. on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1995, pp. 390–395.

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. B. Rieger: Situations, Language Games, and SCIPS. Modeling semiotic cognitive information processing systems. In: A. Meystel/ N. Nerode (eds): Architectures for Semiotic Modeling and Situation Analysis in Large Complex Systems, 10th IEEE Symposium on Intelligent Control. AdRem, Bala Cynwyd, PA, 1995, pp. 130–138.

    Google Scholar 

  39. B. B. Rieger: Situation Semantics and Computational Linguistics: towards Informational Ecology. A semiotic perspective for cognitive information processing systems. In: K. Kornwachs/ K. Jacoby (eds): Information. New Questions to a Multidisciplinary Concept. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1996, pp. 285–315.

    Google Scholar 

  40. B. B. Rieger: Computational Semiotics and Fuzzy Linguistics. On meaning constitution and soft categories. In: A. Meystel (ed): A Learning Perspective: Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Semiotics (ISAS-97), (NIST Special Publ. 918 ). US Gov. Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1997, pp. 541–551.

    Google Scholar 

  41. B. B. Rieger/ C. Thiopoulos: Semiotic Dynamics: a self-organizing lexical system in hypertext. In: R. Köhler/ B. B. Rieger (eds): Contributions to Quantitative Linguistics. Proceedings of the 1st Quantitative Linguistics Conference — QUALICO-91. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 67–78.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. H. Schnelle: Die Herausforderung des Konnektionismus in der kognitiven Linguistik. In: H. Friemel/ G. Müller-Schönberger/ A. Schutt (eds): Forum-90: Wissenschaft und Technik, (Informatik-Fachberichte 259 ). Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg/ NewYork, 1990, pp. 42–58.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Schnelle: Welcher Sprachwissenschaft auf der Spur? Plädoyer für größere Klarheit und Toleranz. Zeitschr.f.Sprachwissenschaft,1994(1):110–120.

    Google Scholar 

  44. P. Smolensky: On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,1988(11):1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  45. P. Smolensky: Connectionism and Constituent Structure. In: R. E. Pfeiffer (ed): Connectionism in Perspective. North Holland & Elsevier, Amsterdam/ NewYork, 1989, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  46. F. Varela/ E. Thompson/ E. Rosch: The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FB II: Department of Computational Linguistics, University of Trier, Germany

    Burghard B. Rieger

Authors
  1. Burghard B. Rieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berkeley Initiative in Soft Computing (BISC) Computer Science Division and Electronics Research Laboratory Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, 94720-1776, Berkeley, CA, USA

    Lotfi A. Zadeh

  2. Systems Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Newelska 6, 01-447, Warsaw, Poland

    Janusz Kacprzyk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieger, B.B. (1999). Semiotics and Computational Linguistics. In: Zadeh, L.A., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Computing with Words in Information/Intelligent Systems 1. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 33. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1873-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11362-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1873-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation