Skip to main content

Rule Induction Algorithm for Application to Geological and Petrophysical Data

  • Chapter
Soft Computing for Reservoir Characterization and Modeling

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 80))

  • 628 Accesses

Abstract

Very large geological, geophysical, and petrophysical databases often contain multiple data types that must be interpreted for application to subsurface modeling. Significant advances in discovering complex and even nonintuitive data relationships could lead to better predictions. There is a litany of data analysis techniques used today, including cluster analysis, principal component analysis, discriminant analysis, parametric and nonparametric regression, and N-dimensional histograms. Regression techniques and neural networks have in common their multivariate combination of predictor variables. These techniques may be good at interpolating within the data boundaries of the training data, but may be poor for extrapolation because of the lack of understanding of the underlying relationships in the variables. Alternatively, machine learning and data mining technologies including Rough Sets hold the promise of finding data category relationships and expressing those in a rule-based language. This paper presents a novel rule induction algorithm derived from these machine-learning techniques, developed for reservoir characterization with geological and geophysical data. A set of facies models with systematical changing in the geometric features is synthesized. The geometric features are coded and the effective permeability is calculated. Rules between effective permeability and geometric features are deducted by using the proposed technique. The consistence of the deducted rules with those implemented in the data synthesization exhibit the effectivity of the proposed technique. Further a second example of facies assignment from wireline logs is used to test the proposed technique. The deducted rules are confirmed by the geologists who spend significant time trying to summarize rules from the well logs. The probability feature of the rules and the distingushibility analysis feature of the proposed technique supplied additional information for the geologist to reconsider their original distinction among facies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balch RS, Stubbs BS, Weiss WW, and Wo S (1999) Using artificial intelligence to correct multiple seismic attributes to reservoir properties. In: SPE Annual Tech Conference and Exhibition. Houston, TX, October 5–8 1999, SPE 56733.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berry MJA, Linoff G (1997) Data Mining Techniques, For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Support. Wiley Computer Publishing, John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop CM (1995) Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley S, Fayyad U, Mangasarian OL (1999) Mathematical programming for data mining formulations and challenges. INORMS J. on Computing 11:217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and Regression Tree. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buntine W (1992) Learning classification trees. Statistics and Computing, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabcna P, Hadjinian P, Stadler R, Verhees J, Zanasi A (1997) Discovering Data Mining from Concept to Implementation. Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Two Crows Corporation (1999) Introduction to Data Mining and Knowledge discovery.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Curram SP, Mingers J (1994) Neural networks, decision tree induction and discriminant analysis: an empirical comparison. Journal of the Operational Research Society 45:440–450.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library: an User’s Guide. Oxford University Press, New York, 2nd Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fayyad U, Piatetsky-Shapiro G, Smyth P, Uthurusamy R (1996) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hook JR, Nieto JA, Kalkomey CT, Ellis D (1994) Facies and permeability prediction from wireline logs and core: a north sea case study. In: 35th Annual SPWLA Logging Symposium,Tulsa.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kohonen T (1989) Self-Organization and Association Memory (3rd edition). Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Kohonen T (1995) Self-Organization Maps. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SH, Datta-Gupta A (1999) Electrofacies characterization and permeability predictions in carbonate reservoirs: roles of multivariate analysis and nonparametric regression. In: SPE Annual Tech Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, October 5–8, SPE 56658.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lira TS, Loh Y, Shih YS (1999) A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. The Machine Learning Journal, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin TY, Cercone N (1998) Rough Sets and Data Mining: Analysis for Imprecise Data. Kluwer Academic Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Menon S, Sharda R (1999) Data mining update: new modes to persue old objectives. ORMS Today, 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Murthy SK, Kasif S, Salzberg S (1994) A system for induction of oblique decision trees. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Orlowska E (1998) Incomplete information: Rough set analysis. In: Vol 13, Studies in Fuzziness and soft computing, p 620. Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pal SK, Skowron A (1999) Rough Fuzzy Hybridization: A New Trend in Decision-Making. Springer Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Data. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998) Rough sets and current trends in computing. In: First international Conference, RSCTC’98, p 601, Warsaw, Poland, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998) Rough sets in knowledge discovery, : Methodology and Application. In: Vol 18, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, p 570. Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Polkowski L, Skowron A (1998) Rough sets in knowledge discovery, ii: Applications, Case Studies, and Software Ssystems. In: Vol 19, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, page 601. Physica Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision tree. Machine Learning, 1:81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ripley BD (1996) Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Scheevel JR, Payrazyan K (1999) Principal component analysis applied to 3D seismic data for reservoir property estimation. In: SPE Annual Tech Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, October 5–8. SPE 56734.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shih YS (1999) Families of splitting criteria for classification trees. Statistics and Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Slowinski R, Slowinski R (1992) Intelligent Decision Support: Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Sets Theory. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Ziarko WP (1993) Rough sets, Fuzzy Sets, and Knowledge Discovery. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Rough Sets and Knowledge Discovery (RSKD 95), Banff, Alberta, Canada, 12–15 October. SpringerVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Deutsch, C.V., Xie, Y.L., Cullick, A.S. (2002). Rule Induction Algorithm for Application to Geological and Petrophysical Data. In: Wong, P., Aminzadeh, F., Nikravesh, M. (eds) Soft Computing for Reservoir Characterization and Modeling. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 80. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1807-9_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1807-9_19

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2495-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1807-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics