Skip to main content

Soft Computing-Based Optimal Operation in Power Energy System

  • Chapter
Soft Computing in Industrial Electronics

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 101))

Abstract

Fossil fuels, chiefly coal, oil and natural gas, currently account for more than 60% of the primary energy used for electricity generation worldwide. This share will continue to increase steadily along with the growing global electricity demand [48]. There is therefore great demand for optimal operation of power energy systems aimed at reducing fossil fuel consumption. Such optimal operation could not only save fuel cost but also reduce CO2 emission, which is considered the main contributor to global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chen C.P., Liu C.W., and Liu C.C. (2000), Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15, no. 2, pp. 707–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter, Jr., C.W. and Sheble, G.B. (2000), A profit-based unit commitment GA for the competitive environment, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15, no. 2, pp. 715–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Takata T., Takahashi J., Yokoi H., Nakano H., Kato M., Aoyagi M., Shimada K., and Arai J. (1999), Advanced method for unit commitment problem using genetic algorithm and mathematical programming, Transactions of IEE Japan, B-119, no. 3, pp. 333–343 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kamiya A., Kawai K., Ono I., and Kobayashi S. (1999), Adaptive edge search for power plant start-up scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part C: Applications and Reviews, 29, no. 4, pp. 518–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kamiya A., Kawai K., Ono I., and Kobayashi S., Theoretical proof of edge search strategy applied to power plant start-up scheduling, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part B (Under Review).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kamiya A., Kimura H., Yamamura M., and Kobayashi S. (1998), Power plant start-up scheduling: A reinforcement learning approach combined with evolutionary computation, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 6, pp. 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hippert H.S., Pedreira C.E., and Souza R.C. (2001), Neural networks for short-term load forecasting: A review and evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16, no. 1, pp. 44–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dillion T.S., Edwin K.W., Kochs H.D., and Taud R.J. (1978), Integer programming approach to the problem of optimal unit commitment with probabilistic reserve determination, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-97, no. 6, pp. 2154–2166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Peng CK., Sheble G.B., and Albuyeh F. (1981), Evaluation of dynamic programming based methods and multiple area representation for thermal unit commitment, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-100, no. 3, pp. 1212–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Virmani S., Adrian E.C., Imhof K., and Mukherjee S. (1989), Implementation of a Lagrangian relaxation based unit commitment problem, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 4, no. 4, pp. 1373–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheble G.B. and Fahd G.N. (1994), Unit commitment literature synopsis, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 9, no. 1, pp. 128–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merlin A. and Sandrin P. (1983), A new method for unit commitment at Electricité de France, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-102, no. 5, pp. 1218–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang S.J., Shahidehpour S.M., Kirschen D.S., Mokhtari S., and Irisarri G.D. (1995), Short-term generation scheduling with transmission and environmental constraints using an augmented Lagrangian relaxation, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 10, no. 3, pp. 1294–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abdul-Rahman K.H., Shahidehpour S.M., Aganagic M., and Mokhtari S. (1996), A practical resource scheduling with OPF constraints, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 11, no. 1, pp. 254–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kamiya A., Ono I., Yamamura M., and Kobayashi S. (1997), Thermal power plant start-up scheduling with evolutionary computation by using an enforcement operator and tabu strategy, Journal of Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 12, pp. 100–110 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanzalek F.J. and Ipsen P.G. (1966), Thermal stresses influence starting, loading of bigger boilers, turbines, Electrical World, 165, pp. 58–62.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Matsumoto H., Eki Y., Kaji A., Nigawara S., Tokuhira M., and Suzuki Y. (1993), An operation support expert system based on on-line dynamics simulation and fuzzy reasoning for startup schedule optimization in fossil power plants, IEEE Transaction, on Energy Conversion, 8, no. 4, pp. 674–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Glover F., Taillard E., and De Werra D. (1993), A user’s guide to tabu search, Annals of Operations Research, 41, pp. 3–28.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirtpatrick, S., Gelatt, Jr., C.D., and Vecchi M.P. (1983), Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, pp. 671–680.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Amjady, N. (2001), Short-term hourly load forecasting using time-series modeling with peak load estimation capability, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 16, no. 3, pp. 498–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Papalexopoulos A.D. and Hesterberg T.C. (1990), A regression-based approach to short-term system load forecasting, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 5, no. 4, pp. 1535–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mastorocostas P.A., Theocharis J.B., and Bakirtzis A.G. (1999), Fuzzy modeling for short term load forecasting using the orthogonal least squares method, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 14, no. 1, pp.29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Khotanzad A., Afkhami-Rohani R., and Maratukulam D. (1998), ANNSTLF-artificial neural network short-term load forecaster-generation three, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 13, no. 4, pp.1413–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Prechelt L. (1998), Automatic early stopping using cross validation: Quantifying the criteria, Neural Networks 11, no. 4, pp. 761–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang F., Yu E. K., Liu Y. Q., and Yan C. S. (1998), Short-term load forecasting based on weather information, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology, pp. 572–575, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shimakura Y., Fujisawa Y., Maeda Y., Ono M., Fann J.Y., and Fukusima N. (1993), Short-term load forecasting using an artificial neural network, Proceedings of the Second International Forum on Applications of Neural Networks to Power Systems, pp. 233–238, Yokohama, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shimakura Y., Fujisawa Y., Kishi Y., Kunugi M., Shimada K., Kawahara Y, Fann J.Y., and Ono M. (1992), Short-term load forecasting using an artificial neural network, IEE Japan Power System Technology Meeting, PE-92–11 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Osaka S., Amano M., and Kawakami J. (1988), An expert system for power generation scheduling, Proceedings of International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence for Industrial Applications, pp. 557–562, Hitachi, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rudolf A., and Bayrleithner R. (1999), A genetic algorithm solution to the unit commitment problem of a hydro-thermal power system, Proceedings of the 13th Power Systems Computations Conference, pp. 745–752, Trondheim, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ohta T., Matsui T., Takata T., Kato M, Aoyagi M., Kunugi M., Shimada K., and Nagata J. (1996), Practical approach to unit commitment problem using genetic algorithm and Lagrangian relaxation method, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems Applications to Power Systems, pp. 434–440, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kawai K., Takizawa Y., and Watanabe S. (1998), Advanced automation for power-generation plants—past, present and future, Proceedings of the 7th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA Symposium in Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man-Machine Systems, pp. 239–244, Kyoto, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tanaka S., Ohta K., Minoura T., and Kogure Y. (1975), New concept software system for power generation plant computer control—COPOS, Proceedings of International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications, pp. 267–275.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kakehi A., and Hatsumi H. (1996), Development of new digital electro-hydraulic control system for steam turbine, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Control Automation, Robotics and Vision, pp. 2106–2110, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kamiya, A., Kakei A., Kawai K., and Kobayashi S. (1999), Advanced power plant start-up automation based on the integration of soft computing and hard computing Techniques, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1-380–1-385, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kimura H., Yamamura M., and Kobayashi S (1995), Reinforcement learning by stochastic hill climbing on discounted reward, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 295–303, Lake Tahoe, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ono I., Yamamura M., and Kobayashi S. (1996), A genetic algorithm with characteristic-preserving for function optimization, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soft Computing, pp. 511–514, Iizuka, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schellstede G., and Wagner H. (1986), A software package for unit commitment and economic dispatch, Proceedings of IF AC Symposium on Power Systems and Power Plant Control, pp. 264–271, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lewis, III, H.W. (2001), Intelligent hybrid load forecasting system for an electric power company, Proceedings of the IEEE Mountain Workshop on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, pp. 23–27, Blacksburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  39. H. Chen and J. Liu (1998), A weighted multi-model short-term load forecasting, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology, pp. 557–560, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ovaska S.J., Dote Y., Furuhashi T., Kamiya A., and VanLandingham H.F. (1999), Fusion of soft computing and hard computing techniques: A review of applications, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. I-370-I-375, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Murillo-Sanchez C, and Thomas R.J. (1998), Thermal unit commitment including optimal AC power flow constraints, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3, pp. 81–88, Koahala Coast, HI.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Karashima N., Suzuki M., Abe M., and Kogure Y. (1981), Newly developed comprehensive automation technique applied to Hirono thermal power station, Proceedings of American Power Conference 43rd Annual Meeting, pp. 153–168, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Bednarski S. and Shen C.N. (1973), Analysis and algorithm for a minimax problem with thermal stress applications, 14th Joint Automatic Control Conference, 20, no. 22, pp. 765–775.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schoenauer M. and Michalewicz Z. (1996), Evolutionary computation at the edge of feasibility, Voigt H.-M., Ebeling W., Rechenberg I, and Schwefel H.-P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, Springer, LNCS 1141, pp. 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Schoenauer M. and Michalewicz Z. (1997), Boundary operators for constrained parameter optimization problems, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 322–329, East Lansing, ML

    Google Scholar 

  46. Hwang R.C., Huang H.C., Chen Y.J., and Hsieh J.G. (1998), Power load forecasting by neural network with a new learning process for considering overtraining problem, Proceedings of International Conference on Energy Management and Power Delivery, 1, pp. 317–322, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Goldberg D.E. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. (1999), International Energy Annual 1999, U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration (EIA), DOE/EIA-0219(99), Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gill P.E., and Murray W. (Eds.) (1974), Numerical Methods for Constrained Optimization, Academic Press, Burlington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kamiya, A., Kato, M., Shimada, K., Kobayashi, S. (2002). Soft Computing-Based Optimal Operation in Power Energy System. In: Soft Computing in Industrial Electronics. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 101. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1783-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1783-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2513-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1783-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics