Skip to main content

Propositional Modal Logic

  • Chapter
Rough Sets

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 15))

  • 355 Accesses

Abstract

We witnessed in the previous Chapter a system of basic modal logic constructed in the framework of a 4—valued logic. In addition to propositional connectives, studied by us in Chapter 2 on propositional logic, some other statements common in everyday speech and reasoning were studied there. These statements called also modal statements encompass such phrases as it is necessary that.., it is possible that.... These statements were interpreted semantically by means of truth functions of modal functors L (necessity) and M (possibility). We have seen that basic modal system have accomodated some basic postulates about modalities while rejecting some less natural postulates e.g. (S5): CMpLMp (what is possible is necessarily possible.) It is desirable to look for other systems with eventually distinct semantics which would accept some of expressions rejected by the basic modal system.

This brings us to the Spindle—destiny, spun according to the ancient by the Fates. [...]; the Fates, with Necessity, Mother of the Fates, manipulate it and spin at the birth of every being so that all comes into existence through Necessity

Plotinus, the Enneads, II.3.9

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works quoted

  1. R. Feys, Les logiques nouvelles des modalités, Revue Néoscholastique de Philosophie, 40(1937), pp, 517–553; 41 (1937), pp. 217–252.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. E. Hughes and M. J. Creswell, A Companion to Modal Logic, Methuen, London, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G. E. Hughes and M. J. Creswell, An Introduction to Modal Logic, Methuen, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Kripke, Semantical analysis of modal logic I, normal propositional calculi, Zeit. Math. Logik, 9 (1963), pp. 67–96.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. E. J. Lemmon and D. S. Scott, The “Lemmon Notes”: An Introduction to Modal Logic, K. Segerberg, ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. I. Lewis and C. H. Langford, Symbolic Logic, Dover, New York, 1959 (2nd ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. H. Von Wright, An Essay in Modal Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polkowski, L. (2002). Propositional Modal Logic. In: Rough Sets. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 15. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1776-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1776-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1510-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1776-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics