Advertisement

From a Design Science to a Design Discipline: Understanding Designerly Ways of Knowing and Thinking

  • Nigel Cross
Part of the Board of International Research in Design book series (BIRD)

Abstract

In the past couple of decades we have seen a significant shift in focus within the field of design research. It is a shift from the aim of creating a ‘design science’ to that of creating a ‘design discipline’. The focus is now on understanding the design process through an understanding of design cognition, or the ‘designerly’ ways of knowing and thinking.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References/Bibliography

  1. [01]
    van Doesberg T (1923) Towards a Collective Construction. De Stijl (Quoted by Naylor G in: The Bauhaus Studio Vista, London, 1968)Google Scholar
  2. [02]
    Le Corbusier (1929) CIAM 2nd Congress, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  3. [03]
    Jones JC, Thornley DG (eds) (1963) Conference on Design Methods. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. [04]
    Simon HA (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. [05]
    Alexander C (1964) Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. [06]
    Alexander C (1971) The State of the Art in Design Methods. DMG Newsletter 5(3) 3–7Google Scholar
  7. [07]
    Jones JC (1977) How my Thoughts about Design Methods Have Changed during the Years. Design Methods and Theories 11(1) 48–62Google Scholar
  8. [08]
    Rittel H, Webber M (1973) Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences 4: 155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [09]
    Tjalve E (1979) A Short Course in Industrial Design. Newnes-Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hubka V (1982) Principles of Engineering Design. Butterworth, GuildfordGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Pahl G, Beitz W (1984) Engineering Design: a Systematic Approach. Springer/Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    French MJ (1985) Conceptual Design for Engineers. Design Council, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Cross N (1989) Engineering Design Methods. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Gregory SA (1966) Design Science. In: Gregory SA (ed.): The Design Method. Butterworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Jacques R, Powell J (eds) (1981) Design:Science: Method. Westbury House, GuildfordGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Cross N, Naughton J, Walker D (1981) Design Method and Scientific Method. In: Jacques R, Powell J (eds): Design:Science:Method. Westbury House, GuildfordGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Glynn S (1985) Science and Perception as Design. Design Studies 6(3) 122–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    de Vries M, Cross N, Grant D (eds) (1993) Design Methodology and Relationships with Science. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Willem RA (1990) Design and Science. Design Studies 11(1) 43–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Hubka V, Eder WE (1987) A Scientific Approach to Engineering Design. Design Studies 8(3) 123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Hansen F (1974) Konstruktionswissenschaft. Hanser, MunichGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Grant D (1979) Design Methodology and Design Methods. Design Methods and Theories: Journal of the DMG 13(1) 46–47Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Gasparski W, Strzalecki A (1990) Contributions to Design Science: Praxeological Perspective. Design Methods and Theories: Journal of the DMG 24(2) 1186–1194Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Cross N (1984) Developments in Design Methodology. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Schön D (1983) The Reflective Practitioner. Temple-Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Cross N, Dorst K, Roozenburg N (eds) (1992) Research in Design Thinking. Delft University Press, DelftGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Cross N, Christiaans H, Dorst K (eds) (1996) Analysing Design Activity. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Cross N, Edmonds E (eds) (2003) Expertise in Design. Creativity and Cognition Press, University of Technology, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Archer B (1981) A View of the Nature of Design Research. In: Jacques R, Powell J (eds): Design:Science:Method. Westbury House, GuildfordGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Cross N (1999) Natural Intelligence in Design. Design Studies 20(1) 25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Dorst K, Dijkhuis J (1995) Comparing Paradigms for Describing Design Activity. Design Studies 16(2) 261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Cross N (1982) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Design Studies 3(4) 221–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Cross N (2006) Designerly Ways of Knowing. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Lawson B (1994) Design in Mind. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Cross N, Clayburn Cross A (1996) Winning by Design: the Methods of Gordon Murray, Racing Car Designer. Design Studies 17(1) 91–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Cross N (2001) Achieving Pleasure from Purpose: the Methods of Kenneth Grange, Product Designer. The Design Journal 4(1) 48–58Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Cross N (2002) Creative Cognition in Design: Processes of Exceptional Designers. In: Hewett T, Kavanagh T (eds) Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, New York, 14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Lawson B (2004) What Designers Know. Elsevier Architectural Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag AG 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel Cross

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations