Skip to main content

Décompositions de Groupes par Produit Direct et Groupes de Coxeter

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Trends in Mathematics ((TM))

Abstract

We provide examples of groups which are indecomposable by direct product, and more generally which are uniquely decomposable as direct products of indecomposable groups. Examples include Coxeter groups, for which we give an alternative approach to recent results of L. Paris.

For a finitely generated linear group Γ, we establish an upper bound on the number of factors of which Γ can be the direct product. If moreover Γ has a finite centre or a finite abelianization, it follows that Γ is uniquely decomposable as direct product of indecomposable groups.

This article originates from the Geneva conference.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Abert, Representing graphs by the non-commuting relation, Publ. Math. Debrecen 69/3 (2006), 261–269.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. G.H. Bagherzadeh, Commutativity in one-relator groups, J. London Math. Soc. 13 (1976), 459–471.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Baumslag and C.F. Miller, III, Some odd finitely presented groups, Bull. London Math. Soc. 20 (1988), 239–244.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. U. Bader et Y. Shalom, Factor and normal subgroup theorems for lattices in products of groups, Inventiones math. 163 (2006), 415–354.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Baumslag, Direct decompositions of finitely generated torsion-free nilpotent groups, Math. Z. (1975) 145, 1–10.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Y. Benoist et P. de la Harpe, Adhérence de Zariski des groupes de Coxeter, Compositio Math. 140 (2004), 1357–1366.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Bieri, Homological dimension of discrete groups, Queen Mary College Mathematics Notes, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. Bourbaki, Algèbre commutative, chapitres 1 à 4, Masson, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Bourbaki, Algèbre commutative, chapitres 5 et 6, Hermann, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Borel, Linear algebraic groups, Second enlarged Edition, Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, chapitres 1 à 3, Diffusion C.C.L.S., 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Bourbaki, Algèbre, chapitres 4 à 7, Masson, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Bourbaki, Groupes et algèbres de Lie, chapitres 4, 5 et 6, Hermann, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.R. Bridson et A. Haefliger, Metric spaces of non-positive curvature, Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. Brieskorn et K. Saito, Artin-Gruppen und Coxeter-Gruppen, Inventiones Math. 17 (1972), 245–271.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. J.W. Cannon, W.J. Floyd, et W.R. Parry, Introductory notes on Richard Thompson’s groups, l’Enseignement math. 42 (1996), 215–256.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. P.B. Eberlein, Geometry of nonpositively curved manifolds, The University of Chicago Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Erdös et P. Pálfy, On the orders of directly indecomposable groups, Discrete Math. (Paul Erdös memorial collection) 200 (1999), 165–179.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Fuchs, Infinite abelian groups, Vol. I & II, Academic Press, 1970 & 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Gelander et Y. Glasner, Infinite primitive groups, arXiv:math. GR/0503001 (Geom. Funct. Anal., to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Gonciulea, Virtual epimorphisms of Coxeter groups onto free groups, PhD thesis, Ohio State University (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  22. R. Grigorchuk, Burnside’s problem on periodic groups, Functional Anal. Appl. 14 (1980), 41–43.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Gruenberg, Residual properties of infinite soluble groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. 7 (1957), 29–62.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. P. Hall, The Frattini subgroups of finitely generated groups, Proc. London Math. Soc. 11 (1961), 327–352 [= Collected Works, 581–608].

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. P. de la Harpe, Topics in geometric group theory, The University of Chicago Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Hirshon, Finitely generated groups L with L ≃ L × M, M ≠ 1, M finitely presented, J. of Algebra 99 (1986), 232–238.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Hirshon, On uniqueness of direct decompositions of groups into directly indecomposable factors, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 63 (1990), 155–160.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. I. Kaplansky, Infinite abelian groups, Univ. of Michigan Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.G. Kurosh, The theory of groups (Volumes I & II), Chelsea, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  30. T.Y. Lam, A first course in noncommutative rings, Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Lubotzky et D. Segal, Subgroup growth, Birkhäuser, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W. Magnus, A. Karras et D. Solitar, Combinatorial group theory, Interscience, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  33. G.A. Margulis, Discrete subgroups of semisimple Lie groups, Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. I. Marin, Sur les représentations de Krammer génériques, arXiv:math.RT/0504143 v2 (Ann. Inst. Fourier, to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  35. G.A. Margulis et E.B. Vinberg, Some linear groups virtually having a free quotient, J. Lie Theory 10 (2000), 171–180.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Meier, Non-Hopfian groups, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 26 (1982), 265–270.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. D.J. Meng, Some results on complete Lie algebras, Comm. in Algebra 22(13) (1994), 5457–5507.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. N. Monod et Y. Shalom, Orbit equivalence rigidity and bounded cohomology, Annals of Math. 164 (2006), 825–878.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. B.H. Neumann, Some remarks on infinite groups, J. London Math. Soc. 12 (1937), 120–127.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. L. Paris, Signatures des graphes de Coxeter, Thèse, Université de Genève (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Paris, Irreducible Coxeter groups, arXiv:math/0412214 v2 (Internat. J. Algebra comput., to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. Paris, Artin groups of spherical type up to isomorphism, J. of Algebra 281 (2004), 666–678.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. D.J.S. Robinson, A course in the theory of groups, Springer, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J.J. Rotman, An introduction to the theory of groups, Fourth Edition, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. du Sautoy, D. Segal, et A. Shalev, New horizons in pro-p-groups, Birkhäuser, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  46. V. Schroeder, A splitting theorem for spaces of nonpositive curvature, Inventiones Math. 79 (1985), 323–327.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. P. Scott et T. Wall, Topological methods in group theory, in “Homological group theory, Durham 1977”, C.T.C. Wall Editor, Cambridge Univ. Press (1979), 137–203.

    Google Scholar 

  48. J.-P. Serre, Cohomologie des groupes discrets, in “Prospects in mathematics”, Annals of Math. Studies 70, Princeton Univ. Press (1971), 77–169.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. J. Stallings, A topological proof of Grushko’s theorem on free products, Math. Z. 90 (1965), 1–8.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. M. Suzuki, Group theory I, Springer, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J.M. Tyrer Jones, Direct products and the Hopf property (Collection of articles dedicated to the memory of Hanna Neumann, VI), J. Austral. Math. Soc. 17 (1974), 174–196.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  52. J.M. Tyrer Jones, On isomorphisms of direct powers, in “Word problems, II (Conf. on Decision Problems in Algebra, Oxford, 1976)”, North-Holland (1980), 215–245.

    Google Scholar 

  53. E.A. Walker, Cancellation in direct sums of groups, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 7 (1956), 898–902.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. J.S. Wilson, Some properties of groups inherited by normal subgroups of finite index, Math. Z. 114 (1970), 19–21.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  55. J.S. Wilson, Embedding theorems for residually finite groups, Math. Z. 174 (1980), 149–157.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  56. R. Zimmer, Ergodic theory and semisimple groups, Birkhäuser, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Cornulier, Y., de la Harpe, P. (2007). Décompositions de Groupes par Produit Direct et Groupes de Coxeter. In: Arzhantseva, G.N., Burillo, J., Bartholdi, L., Ventura, E. (eds) Geometric Group Theory. Trends in Mathematics. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8412-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics