Treatment of the Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Due to Lumbo-Sacral Epidural Fibrosis
The failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a severe, long-lasting, disabling and relatively frequent (5–10%) complication of lumbosacral spine surgery. Wrong level of surgery, inadequate surgical techniques, vertebral instability, recurrent disc herniation, and lumbo-sacral fibrosis are the most frequent causes of FBSS. The results after repeated surgery on recurrent disc herniations are comparable to those after the first intervention, whereas repeated surgery for fibrosis gives only 30–35% success rate, and 15–20% of the patients report worsening of the symptoms. Computerized tomography (CT) with contrast medium and, in particular, Gd-DPTA enhanced MRI have recently allowed a differentiation between these two pathologies permitting us to adopt different therapies. In 1982–92 we applied spinal cord stimulation (SCS) as a first therapy of FBSS with proven lumbo-sacral fibrosis.
Fifty-five patients underwent percutaneous trial SCS with a mono/multipolar electrode placed at the level of Th9-12. In the 36 patients who had a positive response to the trial stimulation, the electrode was connected to an implantable neurostimulator. On January ′94 a third party, not involved in the treatment of the patients, controlled 34 of the 36 patients with a mean follow-up of 55 months. We classified the patients reporting at least 50% pain relief and satisfication with result as successful, and 56% of the patients fell in that category. 10 out of 34 patients were able to resume their work. The success rate was significantly higher in females (73%) than in males, and in radicular rather than axial pain. Our data have led us to consider SCS as a first choice treatment in FBSS due to lumbo-sacral fibrosis.
KeywordsSpinal cord stimulation failed back surgery pain
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Carella A, Andreula CF (1990) Impiego del Gd-DTPA nello studio con risonanza magnetica nella patologia degenerativa del rachide lombare. Riv Neurobiol 3 [Suppl 3]: 91–98Google Scholar
- 8.Finnegan WJ, Fenlin JM, Maevel JP et al (1979) Results of surgical intervention in the symptomatic multiply-operated back patient. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A: 1077–1082Google Scholar
- 13.Masaryk TJ (1989) Herniated nucleus pulposus vs epidural fibrosis: disk vs scar. MRI Decisions 30: 20–26Google Scholar
- 19.Schubiger O, Valvanis A (1982) CT differentiation between recurrent disc herniation and postoperative scar formation: the value of contrast enhancement. Neuroradiology 22: 251– 254Google Scholar
- 23.Thomalske G, Galow W, Ploke G (1977) Critical comments on a comparison of two series (1000 patients each) of lumbar disc surgery. Adv Neurosurg 4: 22–27Google Scholar
- 25.Waddel G, Kummel EG, Lotto WN, et al (1979) Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 61: 201–207Google Scholar
- 26.Winkelmuller W (1981) Experience with the control of low back pain by the dorsal column stimulation (DCS) system and by the peridural electrode system (Pisces). In: Hosobuchi Y, Corbin T (eds) Indications for spinal cord stimulation. Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp 34–41Google Scholar