Assessment of Emergency Care in Trauma Patients

  • B. Bouillon
  • M. Schweins
  • A. Lechleuthner
  • M. Vorweg
  • H. Troidl
Conference paper
Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA, volume 57)


There are many reasons for evaluation of an emergency care system, such as expenses (1.035 Bio. DM in 1985) and quality control.

From January 1, 1987 to December 31, 1987 information on all patients seen by an emergency physician in the field have been recorded prospectively in a standard form by the Cologne emergency medical services. Cologne has 1,000,000 inhabitants and covers an area of 405 km2.

The patients’ status, diagnosis and therapeutic interventions were recorded. Trauma patients were further assessed as to time of accident, cause of accident, and trauma score. All trauma patients with a trauma score < 16 were followed up to their discharge from the hospital.

In 1987, 2,073 trauma patients were treated. Overall mortality at the time of discharge was 9.2%. This result alone, however, is not sufficient for assessment of the trauma system. It is important to provide better information on the patient. The trauma evaluation score already used in the US became also a valid instrument in West-Germany. It shows a high correlation between survival and the patients’ physiological status in the field. Standard curves could be established for comparing individual or regional trauma systems.


Head injury emergency care system trauma evaluation score quality assessment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baker ST,O’Neill B, Hadeon W, Long WB (1974) The injury severity score: a method fordescribing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14: 187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouillon B,Gail HE, Huber J, Klingshirn H,Korbmann H, Kühner R, Raftopoulo A (August 1987) Ansatzpunkte für For schungsarbeiten zumRettungswesen. Projektgruppenbericht der Bundesanstalt fur Straßenwesen, Bereich UnfallforschungGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    BouillonB, Hirschel V, Imig R, Tiling T, Troidl H (1989) Lebensqualität — Kriterium in der Behandlungsstrategie Schwerstverletzter.Langenbecks Arch Chir [Suppl] II: 117–122Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    BoydDR (1973) A symposiumon the Illinois trauma program: a systems approach to the care of critically injured. J Trauma 13:275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bundesamt fur Statistik, Wiesbaden, 1986Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Champion HR,Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AJ, Copes W, Fouty WJ (1981) Trauma Score. Crit Care Med 9: 672–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NationalAcademy of Science/National Research Council (NAS/NRC) (1966) Accidental death and disability -the neglected disease of modern society. Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seefelder C, Matzek N, Rossi R (1988) Polytrauma-Bewertungsskalen.Notfallmedizin14: 227–236,317–329Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma andimpaired consciousness. Lancet II: 81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Troidl H, Kusche J, Vestweber K-H, Eypasch E,Koeppen L, BouillonB (1987) Quality of life: an important endpoint both in surgical practice and research. JChron Dis 40: 523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trunkey DD, Siegel J, Baker SP, Gennarelli TA (1983) Panel: Currentstatus of trauma severity indices. J Trauma 23: 185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trunkey DD (1983) Trauma. Sci Am 249: 28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    TscherneH, Regel G, Sturm JA, Friedl HP (1987) Schweregrad und Prioritäten beiMehrfachverletzungen. Chirurg 58: 631 – 640Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Wagoner FH (1961) Died in hospital: a three-year study of deathsfollowing trauma. J Trauma 1: 184Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waller J A(1974) The accident, the ugly duckling, and the three preventions: a fable for maturehealth officers (Editorial). Am J PubHealth 64: 301, 409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    West JG,Trunkey DD, Lim RC (1979) Systems oftrauma care: a studyof two counties. Arch Surg 114: 455–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Bouillon
    • 1
  • M. Schweins
    • 1
  • A. Lechleuthner
    • 1
  • M. Vorweg
    • 1
  • H. Troidl
    • 1
  1. 1.II. Department of SurgeryKöln-MerheimFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations