Skip to main content

Der Einfluß der Hinterkammerlinsenimplantation auf die Kammerwasserproduktion

Eine fluorophotometrische Studie

  • Chapter
3. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen Implantation

Zusammenfassung

In einer fluorophotometrischen Studie wurde der Einfluß der Sulkusfixation und der Kapselsackfixation von Hinterkammerlinsen auf die Kammerwasserproduktion 61 bzw. 65 Tage nach extrakapsulärer Kataraktextraktion untersucht.

Bei 34 Patienten wurde die Kammerwasserproduktion vor und nach Implantation einer Hinterkammerlinse nach extrakapsulärer Kataraktextraktion mit der Hornhaut-Depot-Methode beidseits fluorophotometrisch gemessen. Alle Patienten wiesen abgesehen von einer senilen Katarakt keine Augenpathologie auf. Hinweise auf allgemeine und ophthalmologische Erkrankungen mit möglichem Einfluß auf die Kammerwasserproduktion bestanden nicht.

Neun Wochen postoperativ zeigten die operierten Augen eine Erhöhung der Kammerwasserproduktion um durchschnittlich 2,13 μl/min bei Sulkusfixation und um durchschnittlich 2,54 μl/min bei kapselsackfixierten Hinterkammerlinsen. Die Kontrolle der Partneraugen zeigte keine signifikanten Veränderungen der Kammerwasserproduktion.

61 und 65 Tage postoperativ fanden sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede im Flow μl/min) zwischen sulkusfixierten und kapselsackflxierten Hinterkammerlinsen.

Summary

The influence of different types of posterior chamber lens implantations on the aqueous humor flow. A fluorophotometric study. Using computerized fluorophotometry the influence of two different types of posterior chamber lens implantations on the aqueous humor flow was investigated. 34 patients underwent fluorophotometry measurements before and after extracapsular cataract extraction. Patients with preexisting glaucoma or those having a history of ocular or systemic inflammation were excluded from the study, also those taking topical or systemic drugs with potential influences on the aqueous humor production. Nine weeks postoperatively a mean increase in aqueous humor flow of 2.13 μl/min after extracapsular cataract extraction plus sulcusfixated IOL and a mean increase of 2.54 μl/min after extracapsular cataract extraction plus capsulefixated IOL was notified. There was no significant change in flow on the unoperated fellow eyes, which served as controls. 61 and 65 days postoperatively there was no significant difference in flow μl/min) between the two different types of posterior chamber lens implantations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Araie M, Takase M (1981) Effects of various drugs on aqueous humor dynamics in man. Jpn J Ophthalmol 25: 91–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom JN, Ralph ZL, Thomas G, Kimura R (1976) Fluorophotometry and the rate of aqueous flow in man. Arch Ophthalmol 94: 435–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom JN, Levene RZ, Thomas G, Kimura R (1976) Fluorophotometry and the rate of aqueous flow in man. I. Instrumentation and normal values. Arch Ophthalmol 94: 435–443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker RF, Nagataki S, Townsend D, Burns R, Higgins R (1981) The effect of age in aqueous humor formation in man. Ophthalmol 88: 283–287

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker RF (1985) Measurement of aqueous humor flow with fluorophotometry. Graefe’s Arch Ophthalmol 222: 190–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker RF (1986) Clinical evaluation of the circulation of aqueous humor. Clin Ophthalmol 3: 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes RL, Brubaker RF (1976) Method of measuring aqueous humor flow and corneal en-dothelial permeability by using a fluorophotometry monogramm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18: 288–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha-Vaz J, Maurice DM (1969) Fluorescein dynamics in the eye. Doc Ophthalmol 26: 61–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha-Vaz JG (1985) A brief historical note on ocular Fluorophotometry. Graefe’s Arch Ophthalmol 222: 168–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich P (1881) Über provozierte Fluoreszenzerscheinungen am Auge. Dtsch med Wochenschr 2: 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Giers U (1988) Intraokularlinsenberechnung. Grenzen und Fehlerquellen. Augenärztl Fortbildung II 14: 127–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldmann H (1950) über Fluoreszein in der menschlichen Vorderkammer: Das Kammerwas-serminutenvolumen des Menschen. Ophthalmol 119: 65–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SB, Coakes RI, Brubaker RF (1976) A simple programmatic method of measuring anterior chamber volume. Am J Ophthalmol 85: 469–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RF, Maurice DM (1966) New methods of measuring the rate of aqueous humor flow in man with fluorescein. Exp Eye Res 5: 208–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer C, Ross K (1977) Studies of aqueous humor dynamics in man, I. Measurements of normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 10: 518–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurice DM (1967) The use of fluorescein in ophthalmological research. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 6: 464–477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyake K, Asakura M, Kobayashi H (1984) Effect of intraocular lens fixation on the blood-aqueous-barrier. Am J Ophthalmol 98: 451–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagataki S, Brubaker RF (1981) The diffusion of fluorescein in the corneal stroma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 20: 66–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagataki S (1985) Aqueous humor dynamics of human eyes as studied using fluorescein. Jpn J Ophthalmol 19: 235–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramxlaar JAM, Boot JP, van Haeringen NJ, van Best JA, Oosterhuis JA (1988) Corneal epithelial permeability after instillation of ophthalmic solutions containing local anaesthetics and preservatives. Curr Eye Res, Vol 7, Nr 9, 947–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders DR, Kraff MC, Liebermann ML, Payman GA, Tarabisny S (1982) Breakdown and reestablishing of blood-aqueous-barrier with implant surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 100: 588–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sponagel ID, Gloor B (1986) Ist die Implantation einer Hinterkammerlinse ein drucksenkender Eingriff?. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 188: 495–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trier HG, Lepper RD (1983) Refraction after intraocular lens implantation: Results with a computerized system for ultrasonic biometry and for implant lens power calculations. Ophthalmic Ultrasonography. Junk, The Hague, pp: 243–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Trier HG, Lepper RD (1984) The accuracy of ultrasonic biometry of the eye independence of the examiners skill. Proc Siduo 10: 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Trier HG, Lepper RD (1987) Measurements of accomodative changes in human eyes by means of a high resolution ultrasonic system. Ophthalmic Echography Junk, The Hague, pp 157–162

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Diestelhorst, M., Roters, S., Krieglstein, G.K. (1990). Der Einfluß der Hinterkammerlinsenimplantation auf die Kammerwasserproduktion. In: Freyler, H., Skorpik, C., Grasl, M.M. (eds) 3. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Intraokularlinsen Implantation. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9074-6_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9074-6_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-9075-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-9074-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics