Abstract
The analysis of past energy consumption as weh as the methodological reflections upon forecasting inevitably lead one to question the extrapolation over a long period of time, in both principle and practice: 1980–2000 will not be a “remake” of 1960–1980, and France, Federal Repubhc of Germany or Italy wiU probably never have the same per capita energy consumption level as that of present day America. In the energy field, as in most other fields, the importance of the past fades with time and gives way to today’s and tomorrow’s decisions and events. The most current mode of extrapolation — the pursuit of growth exponentials — has aheady been denounced by the Club of Rome [1]: to illustrate and to reinforce the latter’s arguments, should we calculate the temperature at which people should heat their homes and the number of hours they should spend in their cars, which are imphcit to an exponential growth? This seems obvious and would not deserve any further attention if the extrapolation and the belief in a hypothetical determmism of energy demand has not underlain many decisions, taken by energy producers and governments, which will be of the uttermost importance for society in the next few decades. Indeed, it is because of this behef in the inevitable “pomts of growth” of energy demand that the possibihties of new energy forms are cast aside, that large scale energy production techniques are justified, and that physical shortage of fossil fuels is considered as inevitable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Meadows, D., et al.: Limits to growth. New York: Universe Books. 1972.
DATAR: Energie et régions. Paris: La Documentation Française. 1980.
Energy policy project of the Ford foundation — a time to choose. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger. 1974.
Thomas, S.: Modelling U.K. energy demand to 2000. Energy Policy 1980, pp. 17–37.
Leach, G., et al.: A low energy strategy for the United Kingdom. London: Science Reviews. 1979.
Ministère de l’Industrie: Un scénario de croissance sobre en énergie pour la France. Paris: La Documentation Française. 1980.
CONAES: Alternative energy demand futures to 2010. Washington: National Academy of Sciences. 1979.
Chateau, B., Lapillonne, B.: Long-term energy demand forecasting: a new approach. Energy Policy 6, 140–157 (1978).
Chateau, B., et al.: La demande d’énergie finale de la France à l’horizon 2000. Grenoble: IEJE. 1979.
Lovins: Soft energy paths: towards a durable peace., Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger. 1977.
Groupe de Bellerive. Project ALTER. Paris: Groupe de Bellerive. 1978.
Norgard, J.: The gentle path of conservation. Lyngby: The Technical University, 1979 (DEMO-project).
Soft Energy Notes. San Francisco: Intemational Project for Soft Energy Paths.
Loniuroth, M., Steen, P., Johansson, T.B.: Energy in Transition. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. 1980.
Finon, D.: Choosing an energy forecast. Symposium of the Nobel Foundation “Managing the European Oil Transition”. Stockholm: 1980 (forthcoming in the proceedings.)
Futuribles,no. 22,pp.3–40,April 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Springer-Verlag/Wien
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chateau, B., Lapillonne, B. (1982). Conclusion: Prospects and Scenarios. In: Energy Demand: Facts and Trends. Topics in Energy. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8639-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8639-8_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-8641-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-8639-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive