Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fetales Monitoring

  • Chapter
Geburtshilfliche Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin

  • 48 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Eine gründliche Anamnese und die körperliche Untersuchung jeder Schwangeren sind am besten geeignet, eine Hochrisikoschwangerschaft zu erkennen. Die antepartale Schwangerschaftsvorsorge kann durch verschiedene apparative Untersuchungen sinnvoll ergänzt werden. Die Ultraschalluntersuchung wird sowohl zur Routinediagnostik der gesunden Schwangeren als auch zur Überwachung von Hochrisikoschwangerschaften eingesetzt. Bei Risikoschwangerschaften kommen ferner die antepartale Kardiotokographie (CTG) mit dem Non-Streß-Test und dem Wehenbelastungstest (Oxytocinbelastungstest, OBT), sowie der vibroakustische Stimulationstest (VAST) zum Einsatz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Drumm JE, Clinch J, MacKenzie G (1976) The ultrasonic measurement of crown-rump length as a method of assessing gestational age. Br J Obstet Gynecol 83: 417–421

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sabbaha RE, Hughey M (1978) Standardization of sonar cephalometry and gestational age. Obstet Gynecol 2: 402–406

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hadlock FP et al (1984) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. Radiology 150: 535–540

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Manning FA et al (1987) Fetal assessment based on fetal biophysical profile scoring: experience in 19, 221 referred high-risk pregnancies. II. An analysis of false-negative fetal deaths. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 157(4 Pt 1): 880–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleischer A et al (1986) Uterine artery doppler velocimetry in pregnant women with hypertension. Am J Obstet Gynecol 154: 806–812

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hecher K, Hackeloer BJ (1997) Cardiotocogram compared to Doppler investigation of the fetal circulation in the premature growth-retarded fetus: longitudinal observations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 9: 152–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. DeVoe LD, Castillo RA, Sherline DM (1985) The non-stress test as a diagnostic test: A clinical reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152: 1047–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thacker SB, Berkelman RL (1986) Assessing the diagnostic accuracy and efficacy of selected antepartum fetal surveillance techniques. Obstet Gynecol Sury 41: 121–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Grade M, Lovett S (1988) Fetal response to sound stimulation: Preliminary report exploring use of sound stimulation in routine obstetrical ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med 7: 499–503

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saltvedt S, Almstrom H (1999) Fetal loss rate after second trimester amniocentesis at different gestational age. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 78: 10–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daffos F, Capella-Pavlovsky M, Forrestier F (1983) A new preocedure for fetal blood sampling in utero: Preliminary results of 53 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 146: 985–987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Antsaklis A, Daskalakis G, Papantoniou N, Michalas S (1998) Fetal blood sampling-indication-related losses. Prenat Diagn 18: 934–940

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Torday J, Carson L, Lawson EE (1979) Saturated phosphaditylcholine in amniotic fluid and prediction of the respiratory distress syndrome. N Eng J Med 301: 1013–1018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Russell JC et al (1989) Multicenter evaluation of TDx test for assessing fetal lung maturity. Clin Chem 35: 1005–1010

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lewis PS, Lauria MR, Dzieczkowski J, Utter GO, Dombrowski MP (1999) Amniotic fluid lamellar body count: cost-effective screening for fetal lung maturity. Obstet Gynecol 93: 387–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cibils LA (ed) (1981) Electronic Fetal-Maternal Monitoring. Saint Louis, Mosby, Year Book, pp 48–59, 98 f

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Cucco C, Osborne MA, Cibils LA (1989) Maternal-fetal outcomes in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161 (4): 916–920

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mendez-Bauer C et al (1963) Effects of atropine on the heart rate of the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 85: 1033

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mendez-Bauer C et al (1963) Effects of atropine on the heart rate of the human fetus during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 85: 1033

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Barcroft J (1946) Researches on prenatal life. Oxford: Blackwell 123–144

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kelso IM et al (1978) An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131: 526–532

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. MacDonald D et al (1985) A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 152: 524–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Haverkamp AD et al (1979) A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 134: 399–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grant JM (1991) The fetal heart rate is normal, isn’t it? Observer agreement of categorial assessments. Lancet 337: 215–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Young DC, Gray JH, Luther ER, Peddle LJ (1980) Fetal scalp blood pH sampling: its value in active obstetric unit. Am J Obstet Gynecol 136: 276–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Westgren M, Kruger K, Ek S, Grunevald C, Kublickas M, Naka K, Wolff K, Persson B (1998) Lactate compared with pH analysis at fetal scalp blood sampling: a prospective randomised study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105: 29–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Seelbach-Gobel B, Heupel M, Kuhnert M, Butterwegge M (1999) The prediction of fetal acidosis by means of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: 73–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luttkus AK, Dudenhausen JW (1998) Fetal pulse oximetry. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 10: 481–486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanson MA, Nijhuis JG (1997) Pulse oximetry-physiological considerations. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, (Suppl) 72: 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peebles DM et al (1992) Changes in human fetal cerebral hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation during labor measured by near infrared spectroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166: 369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA

    Michael A. Frölich

Authors
  1. Michael A. Frölich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Frölich, M.A. (2000). Fetales Monitoring. In: Geburtshilfliche Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6317-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6317-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83172-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6317-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation