Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 78))

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are suited tools for controlling and improving the effectiveness and efficiency of medical care. With the upcoming internet, the numbers of CPGs have increased rapidly, however, only few offer the attributes of good guidelines such as reliability/reproducibility, applicability, flexibility, clarity, multidisciplinary process, scheduled review and documentation of clinical and scientific evidence. Nearly identical criteria for appraisal of CPGs have been developed in many countries consisting of a checklist with questions concerning the quality of development, the content and format, and the applicability of the guideline. In the United States, guidelines which successfully passed the appraisal (or clearing) process, were stored in the National Guideline Clearinghouse, an internet-based database. A German counterpart is under construction, which will comprise clearing reports reviewing and appraising all existent guidelines covering a medical topic. Developing high-quality CPGs is a time consuming and expensive process. A widely accepted guideline for guideline development was published by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network.

CPGs touching neurosurgical topics are rare and often developed without neurosurgical participation. Due to the potential medico-economic impact of CPGs in the future, national neurosurgical societies and their international associations should play a more active role in the development and implementation of CPGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation in Europe (AGREE) collaboration. Appraising clinical guidelines: EC BIOMED-2 project PL96–3669.http://www.sghms.ac.uk/phs/hceu/biomed.htm

  2. Buchborn E (1997) Leitlinien - Richtlinienl - Standards, Risiko oder Chance für Arzt und Patient? Bayer Ärztebl 94: C 1622–1623

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (1997) Beurteilungskriterien für Leitlinien in der medizinischen Versorgung. Dt Ärztebl 94: A2154–2155 (English version, March 1999 -http://www.azq.de)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (1998) Checkliste “Methodische Qualität von Leitlinien”, 1. Version, Gültigkeit: verlängert bis 31. 8. 1999. Dtsch Ärztebl 95: A-2576–2578 (English version, March 1999 -http://www.azq.de)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical Standards Advisory Group (1994) Back pain. Report of a CSAG Committee on back pain. ISBN 0–11–321887–7

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw JM, Feder G (1997). Appraisal instrument for clinical guidelines. St George’s Hospital Medical School, Londonhttp://www.sghms.ac.uk/phs/hceu/clinguid.htm

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cluzeau F, Littlejohns P, Grimshaw JM, Feder G (1997). Appraising the quality of clinical guidelines in the UK. Annu Meet Int Soc Technol Assess Health Care 13: 242–248

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conroy M, Shannon W (1995) Clinical guidelines: their implementation in general practice. Br J Gen Pract 45: 371–375

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Effective Health Care. Implementing clinical practice guidelines (1994) Can guidelines be used to improve practice? University of Leeds, Leeds

    Google Scholar 

  10. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1990) Institute of Medicine Committee to Advise the Public Health Service on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerlach FM, Beyer M, Szecsenyi J, Fischer GC (1998) Leitlinien in Klinik und Praxis. Dt Ärztebl 95: 1014–1021

    Google Scholar 

  12. “Guidelines for Guidelines” Advisory Committee (1996) Principles to guide the evaluation of clinical practice guidelines. Adis International, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274: 1800–1804

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G, for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group (1995) Users’ guides to the medical literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. A. Are the recommendations valid? JAMA 274: 570–574

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G, for the Evidence Based Medicine Working Group: How to use a clinical practice guideline. Centres for health evidence.net.http://www.cche.net/principles/content_pguideline.asp

  16. Helou A, Perleth M, Bitzer EM, Doming H, Schwartz FW (1998) Methodische Qualität ärztlicher Leitlinien in Deutschland. ZaeFQ 92: 421–428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lohr KN, Field MJ (1992) A provisional instrument for assessing clinical practice guidelines. In: Field MJ, Lohr KN (eds) Guidelines for clinical practice. From development to use. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lorenz W, 011enschläger G, Geraedts M, Gerlach FM, Gand-jour A, Helou A, Kirchner H, Koller M, Lauterbach KW, Reinauer H, Sitter H, Thomeczek C (2000) Das Leitlinienmanual von AWMF und AZQ. Entwicklung und Implementierung von Leitlinien in der Medizin. ZaeFQ in press. Online:http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/WWW/AWMF/11/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  19. McEleny P, Bowie P, Robins JB, Brown RC (1998) Getting a validated guideline into local practice: implementation and audit of the SIGN guideline on the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in a district general hospital. Scot Med J 43: 23–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ollenschläger G, Helou A, Kostovic-Cilic L, Perleth M, Raspe HH, Reinhoff O, Selbmann HK, Oesingmann U (1998). Die Checkliste zur methodischen Qualität von Leitlinien: ein Beitrag zur Qualitätsförderung ärztlicher Leitlinien. ZaeFQ 92: 191–194

    Google Scholar 

  21. Randall G, Taylor DW (2000). Clinical practice guidelines: the need for improved implementation strategies. Health Manage Forum 13: 36–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Royal College of General Practitioners (1998) Clinical Guidelines for the management of acute low back pain., VI, 35 S. ISBN 0–85084–229–8http://www.rcgp.org.uk/college/activity/qualclin/guides/backpain/index.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) Clinical guidelines (1995) Criteria for appraisal for national use. Edinburghhttp://www.sign.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (1999) An introduction to SIGN methodology for the development of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Edinburghhttp://www.sign.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar 

  25. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Revised method of grading guideline recommendations. Edinburghhttp://www.sign.ac.uk/

  26. Sturmberg JP (1999) Implementing best practice guidelines: the influence of personal characteristics. J Eval Clin Pract 5: 223–226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. US Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (1993) Acute pain management: operative or medical procedures and trauma. Rockville (MD): The agency: clinical practice guideline no. 1. AHCPR Publication No. 92–0023. p 107

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ward JE, Grieco V (1996) Why we need guidelines for guidelines: a study of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in Australia. MJA 165: 574–576

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wilson MC, Hayward RS, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt G (1995) Users’ guides to the Medical Literature. VIII. How to use clinical practice guidelines. B. what are the recommendations and will they help you in caring for your patients? The Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 274: 1630–1632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Correspondence: Prof. Dr. med Wolf-Ingo Steudel, Department of Neurosurgery, Saarland University Medical School, D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Steudel, WI., Schwerdtfeger, K. (2001). Guidelines for Guidelines. In: Steiger, HJ., Uhl, E. (eds) Risk Control and Quality Management in Neurosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 78. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6237-8_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7275-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6237-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics