Abstract
Dynamical cluster analysis (DCA) was used to extract sets of representative time courses to detect brain lesions using positron emmision tomography (PET) data. DCA is an adaptive hard-clustering algorithm where the number of clusters k is not initially fixed but is dynamically changed by generation and fusion of clusters during runtime. We analyzed PET data sets of 9 patients applying DCA repeatedly. We compared the results that vary in the number of clusters even on the same data set. As validation measure we used the mean square quantization error (MSQE). We found that the MSQE was strictly correlated with k only on 4 of the 9 data sets. We propose DCA for extracting the reference time course required in reference tissue modeling [7]. In the case of one patient, we checked the ability of DCA to characterize directly the three most interesting regions, reference tissue, the veins and the lesion and how this ability relates to high validation scores. The characterisation of all three regions was not reproducible in all of the runs, however, runs rated high in validity by the MSQE were able to reproduce all the three regions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashburner, J., Haslam, J., Taylor, C., Cunningham, V. J., and Jones, T. (1996). A cluster analysis approach for the characterization of dynamic PET data. In Myers, R., Cunningham, V., and Bailey, D., editors, Quantification of Brain Function Using PET, pages 301–306. Academic Press, New York.
Banati, R. B., Goerres, G. W., Myers, R., Gunn, R. N., Turkheimer, F. E., Kreutzberg, G. W., Brooks, D. J., Jones, T., and Duncan, J. S. (1999). [11 C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography imaging of activated microglia. Neurology, 53(9):2199–2203.
Baumgartner, R., Ryner, L., Richter, W., Summers, R., Jarmasz, M., and Somorjai, R. (2000). Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis. Magnetic Resononance Imaging, 18(1):89–94.
Baune, A., Sommer, F. T., Erb, M., Wildgruber, D., Kardatzky, B., and Grodd, W. (1999). Dynamical cluster analysis of cortical fMRI activation. NeuroImage, 6(5):477–489.
Filzmoser, P., Baumgartner, R., and Moser, E. (1999). A hierarchical clustering method for analyzing functional MR images. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 17(6):817–826.
Goutte, C., Toft, P., Rostrup, E., Nielsen, F. A., and Hansen, L. K. (1999). On clustering fMRI time series. NeuroImage, 9:298–310.
Gunn, R. N., Lammertsma, A. A., Hume, S. P., and Cunningham, V. J. (1997). Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. NeuroImage, 6(4):279–287.
Masulli, F., Schenone, A., and Massone, A. M. (2000). Fuzzy clustering methods for the segmentation of multi-modalmedical images. In Szczepaniak, P. S., Lisboa, P. J. G., and Tsumoto, S., editors, Fuzzy Systems in Medicine, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 335–350. Springer-Verlag.
McKeownj, M. J. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Independent component analysis of fMRI data: Examining the assumptions. Human Brain Mapping, 6:368–372
Schalkoff, R. J. (1989). Digital Image Processing and Computer Vision. Wiley, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Baune, A., Wichert, A., Glatting, G., Sommer, F.T. (2001). Dynamical Cluster Analysis for the Detection of Microglia Activation. In: Kůrková, V., Neruda, R., Kárný, M., Steele, N.C. (eds) Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6230-9_110
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6230-9_110
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83651-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6230-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive