Skip to main content

Dynamical Cluster Analysis for the Detection of Microglia Activation

  • Conference paper
Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms

Abstract

Dynamical cluster analysis (DCA) was used to extract sets of representative time courses to detect brain lesions using positron emmision tomography (PET) data. DCA is an adaptive hard-clustering algorithm where the number of clusters k is not initially fixed but is dynamically changed by generation and fusion of clusters during runtime. We analyzed PET data sets of 9 patients applying DCA repeatedly. We compared the results that vary in the number of clusters even on the same data set. As validation measure we used the mean square quantization error (MSQE). We found that the MSQE was strictly correlated with k only on 4 of the 9 data sets. We propose DCA for extracting the reference time course required in reference tissue modeling [7]. In the case of one patient, we checked the ability of DCA to characterize directly the three most interesting regions, reference tissue, the veins and the lesion and how this ability relates to high validation scores. The characterisation of all three regions was not reproducible in all of the runs, however, runs rated high in validity by the MSQE were able to reproduce all the three regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashburner, J., Haslam, J., Taylor, C., Cunningham, V. J., and Jones, T. (1996). A cluster analysis approach for the characterization of dynamic PET data. In Myers, R., Cunningham, V., and Bailey, D., editors, Quantification of Brain Function Using PET, pages 301–306. Academic Press, New York.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Banati, R. B., Goerres, G. W., Myers, R., Gunn, R. N., Turkheimer, F. E., Kreutzberg, G. W., Brooks, D. J., Jones, T., and Duncan, J. S. (1999). [11 C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography imaging of activated microglia. Neurology, 53(9):2199–2203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baumgartner, R., Ryner, L., Richter, W., Summers, R., Jarmasz, M., and Somorjai, R. (2000). Comparison of two exploratory data analysis methods for fMRI: fuzzy clustering vs. principal component analysis. Magnetic Resononance Imaging, 18(1):89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baune, A., Sommer, F. T., Erb, M., Wildgruber, D., Kardatzky, B., and Grodd, W. (1999). Dynamical cluster analysis of cortical fMRI activation. NeuroImage, 6(5):477–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Filzmoser, P., Baumgartner, R., and Moser, E. (1999). A hierarchical clustering method for analyzing functional MR images. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 17(6):817–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goutte, C., Toft, P., Rostrup, E., Nielsen, F. A., and Hansen, L. K. (1999). On clustering fMRI time series. NeuroImage, 9:298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gunn, R. N., Lammertsma, A. A., Hume, S. P., and Cunningham, V. J. (1997). Parametric imaging of ligand-receptor binding in PET using a simplified reference region model. NeuroImage, 6(4):279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Masulli, F., Schenone, A., and Massone, A. M. (2000). Fuzzy clustering methods for the segmentation of multi-modalmedical images. In Szczepaniak, P. S., Lisboa, P. J. G., and Tsumoto, S., editors, Fuzzy Systems in Medicine, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 335–350. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McKeownj, M. J. and Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). Independent component analysis of fMRI data: Examining the assumptions. Human Brain Mapping, 6:368–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Schalkoff, R. J. (1989). Digital Image Processing and Computer Vision. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baune, A., Wichert, A., Glatting, G., Sommer, F.T. (2001). Dynamical Cluster Analysis for the Detection of Microglia Activation. In: Kůrková, V., Neruda, R., Kárný, M., Steele, N.C. (eds) Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6230-9_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6230-9_110

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83651-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6230-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics