Abstract
Undesirable — or incompatible — crash interactions between one vehicle and its collision partner can be due to differences in structure, mass, stiffness and geometry. These differences can increase deformation and acceleration levels in one or both of the vehicles and thereby increase occupant injury risks. Real world statistics indicate that the ratio of occupant fatalities between two vehicle types can range from 1.6:1 (cars and light trucks in frontal collisions) to 23:1 (cars struck in the side by large vans). The mix of vehicle types and potential impact conditions present a challenge when designing crash protection strategies for motor vehicles and the transportation network.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hobbs, C.A. and Williams, D.A., The development of the frontal offset deformable barrier test, Proceedings of the 14th Int. Techn. Conf on ESV, Paper No. 94-S8-O-06, Munich, Germany, 1994.
Thomas, P., Real world collisions and appropriate barrier tests, Proceedings of the 14th Int. Techn. Conf. on ESV, Paper No. 94-S8-W-19, Munich, Germany, 1450–1460, 1994.
Tarriere, C., Morvan, Y., Steyer, C. and Bellot, D., Accident research and experimental data useful for an understanding of the influence of car structural incompatibility on the risk of accident injuries, Proceedings of the 14th Int. Techn. Conf on ESV, Munich, Germany, 593–609, 1994.
O’Neill, B., Lund, A.K., Zuby, D.S. and Preuss, C.A., Offset frontal impacts-a comparison of real-world crashes with laboratory tests, Proceedings of the 14th Int. Techn. Conf on ESV, Paper No. 94-S4–O19; Munich, Germany, 649–670, 1994.
Tarriere, C., Car safety and ratings: comparative study of facts and practices -proposals, Proceedings of IRCOBI Conf. on Biomechanics; Lyon, France, 165–179, 1994.
Kullgren, A., Ydenius, A. and Tingvall, C., Frontal impacts with small partial overlap: real life data from crash recorders, Proceedings of the. 16th Int. Techn. Conf. on ESV, Paper No. 98-S1-O-13, Windsor, Canada, 1998.
Thomas, C., Foret-Bruno, J.Y., Brutel, G., LeCoz, J.Y., Got, C, and Patel, A., Front passenger protection: what specific requirements in frontal impact?, Proceedings of the IRCOBI Conf. on Biomechanics, Lyon, France, 205–216, 1994.
Buzeman, D.G., Viano, D.C. and Lovsund, P., Injury probability and risk in frontal crashes: the effect of sorting techniques on priorities for offset testing, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30 (5), 583–595, 1998.
Evans, L., Traffic Safety and the Driver, Van Nostrad Reinhold, 1991.
Broughton, J., The theoretical basis for comparing the accident record of car models, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 28, 89–99, 1996.
Gabler, H.C. and Hollowell, W.T., The crash compatibility of cars and light trucks, Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, 2 (1), 19–31, 2000.
Buzeman–Jewkes, D.G., Viano, D.C. and Lovsund, P., Use of repeated crash–tests to determine local longitudinal and shear stiffness of the vehicle front with crush, SAE Paper No. 1999–01–0637, Soc. Of Autom. Engineers, Warrendale, PA,, 1999.
Campbell, K.L., Energy basis for collision severity, SAE Paper No. SAE 740565, Soc. Of Autom. Engineers, Warrendale, PA, 1974.
Wood, D.P., Safety and the car size effect: a fundamental explanation, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29, 139–151, 1997.
Buzeman-Jewkes, D.G., Viano, D.C. and Lovsund, P., A Multi-body integrated vehicle-occupant model for compatibility studies in frontal crashes, Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, 1 (2), 143–154, 1999.
Buzeman, D.G., Viano, D.C. and Lovsund, P., Car occupant safety in frontal crashes: a parameter-study of vehicle mass, impact speed and inherent vehicle protection, Accident Analysis and Prevention, 30 (6), 713–722, 1998.
Zeidler, F., The influence of frontal crash test speeds on the compatibility of passenger cars in real world accidents, Int. Symp. on RWCIR, Leicestershire, England, 1997.
Hobbs, C.A., Williams, D.A. and Coleman, D.J., Compatibility of cars in frontal and side impact, Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Enhanced Vehicle Safety, Paper No. 96-S4-O-05, Melbourne, Australia, 617–625, 1996.
MacLaughlin, T.F., Saul, R.A. and Daniel, S.Jr., Causes and measurement of vehicle aggressiveness in frontal collisions, Proceedings of the 24th Stapp Conference, Paper No. 801316, 639700, 1980.
Buzeman, D.G., Viano, D.C. and Lovsund, P., Occupant risk, partner risk and fatality rate in frontal crashes: estimated effects of changing vehicle fleet mass in 15 years. Journal of Crash Prevention and Injury Control, 2 (1), 1–10, 2000.
Yang, J.K., Lovsund, P., Cavallero, C. and Bonnoit J., A human-body 3d mathematical model for simulation of car-pedestrian impacts, Journal of Crash Protection and Injury Control, 2 (2), 1 2000.
Reagan, J.A., Vehicle Compatibility With Roadside Safety Hardware, Public Roads, 59(2), Federal Highways Administration, Department of Transportation, 1995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien
About this paper
Cite this paper
Buzeman-Jewkes, D., Thomson, R.W., Viano, D.C. (2001). Crash Compatibility. In: Ambrosio, J.A.C. (eds) Crashworthiness. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 423. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2572-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2572-4_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna
Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83334-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2572-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive