Plane Bending of a Curved Rod

  • Yury Vetyukov
Part of the Foundations of Engineering Mechanics book series (FOUNDATIONS)


We present a combination of the asymptotic, direct, and numerical methods on the example plane problem of finite deformations of a thin curved strip. The study includes both static and dynamic analyses; the inhomogeneity of the strip is taken into account. The method of asymptotic splitting allows for a consistent dimensional reduction of the equations of the original two-dimensional continuous problem into a one-dimensional formulation of the reduced theory and a problem in the cross section. It also provides a consistent way to recover the distributions of stresses, strains, and displacements in two dimensions. The direct approach to a material line extends the results to the geometrically nonlinear range. Several analytical solutions and the implementation of a finite element scheme are demonstrated with the Mathematica computer system. We investigate the convergence of solutions of various problems in the original (two-dimensional) and reduced (one-dimensional) models with respect to the thickness. This justifies the analytical conclusion that the classical Kirchhoff theory of rods remains asymptotically accurate irrespective from both the curvature of the strip and the variation of the material properties over the thickness. This chapter quotes extensively from Vetyukov (Acta Mech., 223(2):371–385, 2012) with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media.

Supplementary material

310026_1_En_2_MOESM1_ESM.nb (24 kb)
(NB 24 kB)
310026_1_En_2_MOESM2_ESM.nb (537 kb)
(NB 537 kB)


  1. 3.
    Altenbach J, Altenbach H, Eremeyev V (2010) On generalized Cosserat-type theories of plates and shells: a short review and bibliography. Arch Appl Mech 80(1):73–92 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 6.
    Antman S (1995) Nonlinear problems of elasticity. Springer, Berlin CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 26.
    Bonet J, Wood R (2008) Nonlinear continuum mechanics for finite element analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 45.
    Dmitrochenko O, Pogorelov D (2003) Generalization of plate finite elements for absolute nodal coordinate formulation. Multibody Syst Dyn 10:17–43 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 50.
    Eliseev V (2003) Mechanics of elastic bodies. St Petersburg State Polytechnical University Publishing House, St Petersburg (in Russian) Google Scholar
  6. 51.
    Eliseev V (2006) Mechanics of deformable solid bodies. St Petersburg State Polytechnical University Publishing House, St Petersburg (in Russian) Google Scholar
  7. 61.
    Gerstmayr J, Irschik H (2008) On the correct representation of bending and axial deformation in the absolute nodal coordinate formulation with an elastic line approach. J Sound Vib 318(3):461–487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 65.
    Goldenveizer A (1969) Boundary layer and its interaction with the interior state of stress of an elastic thin shell. J Appl Math Mech 33:971–1001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 76.
    Hughes T (2000) The finite element method: linear static and dynamic finite element analysis. Dover, New York Google Scholar
  10. 77.
    Irschik H (1991) Analogy between refined beam theories and the Bernoulli–Euler theory. Int J Solids Struct 28:1105–1112 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 79.
    Irschik H, Gerstmayr J (2009) A continuum mechanics based derivation of Reissner’s large-displacement finite-strain beam theory: the case of plane deformations of originally straight Bernoulli–Euler beams. Acta Mech 206:1–21 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 80.
    Irschik H, Heuer R, Ziegler F (2000) Statics and dynamics of simply supported polygonal Reissner–Mindlin plates by analogy. Arch Appl Mech 70(4):231–244 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 92.
    Kulikov G, Plotnikova S (2013) A new approach to three-dimensional exact solutions for functionally graded piezoelectric laminated plates. Compos Struct 106:33–46 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 95.
    Lacarbonara W, Yabuno H (2006) Refined models of elastic beams undergoing large in-plane motions: theory and experiment. Int J Solids Struct 43(17):5066–5084 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 99.
    Lin Y (2004) A higher order asymptotic analysis for orthotropic plates in stress edge conditions. J Elast 77:25–55 zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 124.
    Rajagopal A, Hodges D, Yu W (2012) Asymptotic beam theory for planar deformation of initially curved isotropic strips. Thin-Walled Struct 50:106–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 128.
    Reissner E (1972) On one-dimensional finite strain beam theory: the plane problem. J Appl Math Phys 23:794–804 Google Scholar
  18. 133.
    Rubin M (2001) Numerical solution procedures for nonlinear elastic rods using the theory of a Cosserat point. Int J Solids Struct 38:4395–4437 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 137.
    Schneider W (1978) Mathematische Methoden der Strömungsmechanik. Vieweg, Braunschweig (in German) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 140.
    Shabana A (2008) Computational continuum mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 142.
    Simo J, Vu-Quoc L (1986) A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 58:79–116 CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 157.
    Van Dyke M (1975) Perturbation methods in fluid mechanics. Parabolic Press, Stanford zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 160.
    Vetyukov Y (2012) Hybrid asymptotic-direct approach to the problem of finite vibrations of a curved layered strip. Acta Mech 223(2):371–385 CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 172.
    Yeliseyev V, Orlov S (1999) Asymptotic splitting in the three-dimensional problem of linear elasticity for elongated bodies with a structure. J Appl Math Mech 63(1):85–92 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yury Vetyukov
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Technical MechanicsJohannes Kepler UniversityLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations