Skip to main content

The Case for the Eumetsat Polar System (EPS)/Metop Second-Generation Programme: Cost Benefit Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Yearbook on Space Policy 2011/2012

Part of the book series: Yearbook on Space Policy ((YEARSPACE))

Abstract

Observations from meteorological satellites are crucial inputs for the generation of weather forecasts and, in order to derive an estimate of the benefit-to-cost ratio of the polar-orbiting EPS/Metop-SG satellite programme proposed by EUMETSAT and ESA, an assessment of the socio-economic benefits of forecasts within the EU, in a number of key areas, is overlaid onto an analysis of the impact of polar-orbiting satellite observations on forecast skill, to produce a likely benefit-to-cost ratio of 20 for the proposed programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Joo S, Eyre JR, Marriott RT (2012) The impact of Metop and other satellite data within the Met Office global NWP system, using an adjoint-based sensitivity method. Forecasting research technical report 562, Met Office, UK.

  2. 2.

    Hallegatte S (2012) A cost effective solution to reduce disaster losses in developing countries: hydro-meteorological services, early warning, and evacuation, policy research working paper 6058, The World Bank.

  3. 3.

    Robine J-M, Cheung SLK, Le Roy S, Van Oyen H, Griffiths C, Michel J-P, Herrmann FR (2008). C R Biol 331(2):171–178.

  4. 4.

    Dossier d’information “Avalanche” du Ministère de l’Aménagement du Territoire et de l’Environnement (2000). Available on http://www.prim.net.fr.

  5. 5.

    Estimation de la surmortalité observée et attendue au cours de la vague de chaleur du mois de juillet (2006). http://www.invs.sante.fr/publications/2007/canicule_2006/canicule_2006.pdf.

  6. 6.

    According to the “Bureau Enquête Accident”, 7.5 % of plane accidents have meteorological causes (http://www.bea-fr.org/etudes/stat9798/stats1997-1998.htm).

  7. 7.

    The value of hydro-meteorological information in Europe, Stéphane Hallegatte, paper in preparation.

  8. 8.

    Thieken AH, Kreibich H, Muller M, Merz B (2007) Coping with floods: preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany in 2002. Hydrol Sci 52(5):1016–1037.

    Thieken AH, Petrow T, Kreibich H, Merz B (2006) Insurability and mitigation of flood losses in private households in Germany. Risk Anal 26(2):383–395.

    Thieken AH, Muller M, Kreibich H, Merz B (2005) Flood damage and influencing factors: new insights from the August 2002 flood in Germany. Water Resour Res 41:1–16.

    Kreibich H, Thieken AH, Petrow TH, Muller M, Merz B (2005) Flood loss reduction of private households due to building precautionary measures – lessons learned from the elbe flood in August 2002. Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 5:117–126.

  9. 9.

    Tapsell et al (2008) Modelling the damage reducing effects of flood warnings, final report of the FLOODsite project. Available on www.floodsite.net.

  10. 10.

    Carsell KM, Pingel ND, Ford DT (2004) Quantifying the benefit of a flood warning system. Nat Hazards Rev 5(3):131–140.

  11. 11.

    Barredo (2009) Normalised flood losses in Europe: 1970–2006. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:97–104.

  12. 12.

    It is assumed that false alarms have no cost, which is not the case, especially in case of large scale evacuations.

  13. 13.

    Swiss Re (2006) The effect of climate change: storm damage in Europe on the rise. http://www.preventionweb.net/files/20629_publ06klimaveraenderungen1.pdf.

  14. 14.

    The value of hydro-meteorological information in Europe, Stéphane Hallegatte, paper in preparation.

  15. 15.

    Planning for Delay: influence of flight scheduling on airline punctuality, EUROCONTROL Trends in Air Traffic, Volume 7.

  16. 16.

    Council Regulation (EC) No 219/2007 of 27 February 2007 on the establishment of a Joint Undertaking to develop the new generation European air traffic management system (SESAR).

  17. 17.

    Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency.

  18. 18.

    http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air/internal_market/internal_market_en.htm

  19. 19.

    Roulston MS, Kaplan DT, Hardenberg J, Smith LA (2003) Using medium-range weather forecasts to improve the value of wind energy production. Renew Energ 28:585–602.

  20. 20.

    Wilks DS, Wolfe DW (1998) Optimal use and economic value of weather forecasts for lettuce irrigation in a humid climate. Agr Forest Meteorol 89:115–130.

  21. 21.

    The value of hydro-meteorological information in Europe, Stéphane Hallegatte, paper in preparation.

  22. 22.

    Lazo JK, Morss RE, Demuth JL (2009) 300 billion served: sources, perceptions, uses, and values of weather forecasts. B Am Meteorol Soc 90(6):785–798.

  23. 23.

    The benefits are independent and therefore additive.

  24. 24.

    E.g. in fulfillment of responsibilities to civil aviation as a World Area Forecast Centre (WAFC).

  25. 25.

    Observing system experiments to assess the impact of possible future degradation of the global satellite observing network, Tony McNally, ECMWF Technical Memo 672, November (2011) Final report in preparation.

  26. 26.

    The impact of satellite data on GME short-range forecasts – A case study, DWD internal report, January 20, 2012.

  27. 27.

    In the last 50 years flood and storm losses have generally increased, as fast or faster, than GDP.

  28. 28.

    Socio-economic benefits analysis of GMES, PWC et al. 2006, Cost benefit analysis for GMES, Booz& co 2011.

  29. 29.

    Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Global Environ Chang 19:240–247.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Hallegatte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallegatte, S., Eyre, J., McNally, T., Potthast, R., Husband, R. (2014). The Case for the Eumetsat Polar System (EPS)/Metop Second-Generation Programme: Cost Benefit Analysis. In: Al-Ekabi, C., Baranes, B., Hulsroj, P., Lahcen, A. (eds) Yearbook on Space Policy 2011/2012. Yearbook on Space Policy. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1649-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1649-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1648-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1649-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics