Skip to main content

Optimal Visualization of Multiple Brain Metastases for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Part of the Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement book series (NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 116)


Background: Optimal management of metastatic brain disease requires precise detection and detailed characterization of all intracranial lesions.

Methods: We analyzed an experience with 3200 brain MRI investigations performed at 1.5 T and 3.0 T for identification and/or evaluation of intracranial metastases. Usually axial T1- and T2-weighted images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images in axial and coronal and/or sagittal projections were obtained. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and diffusion-weighted imaging were sometimes used as well. Routinely, 0.2 mmol/kg of gadoteridol (ProHance®) was administered intravenously, but the dose was reduced to 0.1 mmol/kg in elderly patients or in patients with mild renal dysfunction.

Findings: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provided excellent information on tumor location; interrelations with functionally important intracranial structures; type of growth; vascularity; recent, old or multiple hemorrhages within or in the vicinity of the mass; presence of peritumoral edema; necrotic changes; subarachnoid dissemination; meningeal carcinomatosis. However, without administration of gado-teridol or without contrast enhancement, small metastatic tumors could not be reliably distinguished from brain lacunes. Some metastases (malignant melanoma, thyroid cancer, endocrine carcinoma, small cell lung carcinoma) may demonstrate specific neuroimaging features. Non-metastatic ­multiple brain lesions caused by vascular, inflammatory, demyelinative or lymphoproliferative diseases require a thorough differential diagnosis with metastatic brain tumors based not only on neuroimaging but on additional analysis of various clinical data.

Conclusion: Contemporary MRI techniques provide excellent options for detection, detailed characterization, and differential diagnosis of metastatic brain tumors, which is extremely important when choosing the optimal treatment strategy, particularly with Gamma Knife radiosurgery.


  • Brain metastases
  • Diagnosis
  • Differential diagnosis
  • MRI
  • Multiple brain lesions

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1376-9_25
  • Chapter length: 8 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-7091-1376-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8


  1. Abe K, Ono Y, Suzuki M, Akagawa H, Omoto K, Sannomiy A, Kohno M, Hayano T, Tanabe K, Teraoka S, Uchiyama S, Okada Y, Sakai S (2010) MRI findings of the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder of the Central Nervous System. In: Program and abstracts of the second Japanese-Russian neurosurgical symposium, 9–11 May 2010, Fujiyoshida, Japan, p 17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Camacho DL, Smith JK, Castillo M (2003) Differentiation of toxoplasmosis and lymphoma in AIDS patients by using apparent diffusion coefficients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:633–637

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chappell PM, Pelc NJ, Foo TK, Glover GH, Haros SP, Enzmann DR (1994) Comparison of lesion enhancement on spin-echo and gradient-echo images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:37–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fidler IJ, Yano S, Zhang RD, Fujimaki T, Bucana CD (2002) The seed and soil hypothesis: vascularization and brain metastases. Lancet Oncol 3:53–57

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayashida Y, Hirai T, Morishita S, Kitajima M, Murakami R, Korogi Y, Makino K, Nakamura H, Ikushima I, Yamura M, Kochi M, Kuratsu JI, Yamashita Y (2006) Diffusion-weighted imaging of metastatic brain tumors: comparison with histologic type and tumor cellularity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1419–1425

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Herman DL, Courville CB (1965) Pathogenesis of meningeal carcinomatosis: report of a case secondary to carcinoma of cecum via perineural extension – with a review of 146 cases. Bull Los Angeles Neurol Soc 30:107–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lu H, Nagae-Poetscher LM, Golay X, Lin D, Pomper M, van Zijl PC (2005) Routine clinical brain MRI sequences for use at 3.0 Tesla. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:13–22

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Kato Y, Higano S, Tamura H, Mugikura S, Umetsu A, Murata T, Takahashi S (2009) Usefulness of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions in detection of small brain metastasis at 3 T MR Imaging: comparison with magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition of gradient echo imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:923–929

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mugler JP 3rd, Bao S, Mulkern RV, Guttmann CR, Robertson RL, Jolesz FA, Brookeman JR (2000) Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 216:891–899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nomoto Y, Miyamoto T, Yamaguchi Y (1994) Brain metastasis of small cell lung carcinoma: comparison of Gd-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and enhanced computerized tomography. Jpn J Clin Oncol 24:258–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaefer PW, Budzik RF Jr, Gonzalez RG (1996) Imaging of cerebral metastases. Neurosurg Clin N Am 7:393–423

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith AB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Rushing EJ (2008) From the archives of the AFIP: central nervous system infections associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection – radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 28:2033–2058

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki K, Yamamoto M, Hasegawa Y, Ando M, Shima K, Sako C, Ito G, Shimokata K (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnoses of brain metastases of lung cancer. Lung Cancer 46:357–360

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tatsuno S, Hata Y, Tada S (1996) Double-dose Gd-DTPA: detectability of intraparenchymal brain metastasis. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 56:855–859 (in Japanese)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Ono .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ono, Y. et al. (2013). Optimal Visualization of Multiple Brain Metastases for Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. In: Chernov, M., Hayashi, M., Ganz, J., Takakura, K. (eds) Gamma Knife Neurosurgery in the Management of Intracranial Disorders. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol 116. Springer, Vienna.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1375-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1376-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)