Advertisement

Evaluation of Media-Based Social Interactions: Linking Collective Actions to Media Types, Applications, and Devices in Social Networks

  • Alan Keller GomesEmail author
  • Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Social Networks book series (LNSN)

Abstract

There is a growing number of opportunities for users to perform collective actions in social networks: Such collective actions engage users in correspondents social interactions. Although some models for representing users and their relationships in social networks have been proposed, to the best of our knowledge, these models do not explain what the underlying social interactions are. In previous work, we have proposed a human-readable technique for modeling and measuring social interactions, which resulted from users’ actions that involved, for instance, media types, interaction devices, and viral content. In our technique, social interactions are represented as behavioral contingencies in the form of if-then rules, which are then measured using an established data mining procedure. After being able to represent and measure a variety of social interactions, we identified the opportunity of transforming our technique into a method for capturing, representing, and measuring collective actions in social networks. In this chapter, we present our method and detail how it was applied to represent and measure social interactions among a group of 1,600 Facebook users over the period of 7 months. Our results report the link among actions (e.g., like), media objects (e.g., photo), application type (Web or mobile), and device type (e.g., Android).

Keywords

Social Interaction Media Type Social Stimulus Media Object Social Network User 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank CAPES, CNPq, FAPESP, MCT, and FINEP. The author Alan Keller Gomes also thanks PIQS—IFG.

References

  1. Abrol S, Khan L (2010) Tweethood: agglomerative clustering on fuzzy k-closest friends with variable depth for location mining. In: IEEE international conference on social computing (SocialCom). Minneapolis, MN, pp 153–160Google Scholar
  2. Azevedo PJ, Jorge AM (2007) Comparing rule measures for predictive association rules. In: ACM European conference on machine learning (ECML ’07). Berlin, pp 510–517Google Scholar
  3. Backstrom L, Bakshy E, Kleinberg J, Lento T, Rosenn I (2011) Center of attention: how Facebook users allocate attention across friends. In: Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on Weblogs and social mediaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley F, Metcalf C (2009) The use of mobile social presence. Pervasive Comp IEEE 8(4):35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigonha CAS, Cardoso TNC, Moro MM, Almeida VAF, Gonçalves MA (2010) Detecting evangelists and detractors on twitter. In: Proceedings of 16th Brazilian symposium on multimedia and Web (WebMedia᾿10), pp 107–114Google Scholar
  6. Bonchi F, Castillo C, Gionis A, Jaimes A (2011) Social network analysis and mining for business applications. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2:22:1–22:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chorianopoulos K (2010) Scenarios of use for sociable mobile TV. In: Marcus A, Sala R, Roibs AC (eds) Mobile TV: customizing content and experience. Springer, London, pp 243–254Google Scholar
  8. Cowan LG, Weibel N, Pina LR, Hollan JD, Griswold WG (2011) Ubiquitous sketching for social media. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services. ACM, New York, NY, pp 395–404Google Scholar
  9. De Choudhury M, Counts S, Czerwinski M (2011) Identifying relevant social media content: leveraging information diversity and user cognition. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia. ACM, New York, NY, pp 161–170Google Scholar
  10. Ekenel H, Semela T (2011) Multimodal genre classification of TV programs and Youtube videos. Multimedia Tools Appl 63:547–567. doi: 10.1007/s11042-011-0923-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fagá R Jr, Motti VG, Cattelan RG, Teixeira CAC, Pimentel MGC (2010) A social approach to authoring media annotations. In: ACM symposium on document engineering (DocEng ᾿10). ACM, New York, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  12. Freeman LC (2004) The development of social network analysis: a study in the sociology of science. Empirical Press, Vancouver, CAGoogle Scholar
  13. Fürnkranz J, Gamberger D, Lavrac N (2011) Rule learning: essentials of machine learning and relational data mining, 1st edn. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Geerts D (2010) The sociability of mobile TV. In: Marcus A, Sala R, Roibs AC (eds) Mobile TV: customizing content and experience. Springer, London, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  15. Geerts D, Grooff DD (2009). Supporting the social uses of television: sociability heuristics for social TV. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI 2009. ACM, New York, pp 595–604Google Scholar
  16. Gomes AK, Pimentel MdGC (2011a) Measuring media-based social interactions provided by smartphone applications in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM workshop on social and behavioral networked media access (SBNMA ᾿11). ACM, New York, NY, pp 59–64Google Scholar
  17. Gomes AK, Pimentel MdGC (2011b) Measuring synchronous and asynchronous sharing of collaborative annotations sessions on ubi-videos as social interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on Ubi-media computing (U-MEDIA ᾿11). Sao Paulo, pp 122–129Google Scholar
  18. Gomes AK, Pimentel MdGC (2011c) Social interactions representation as users behavioral contingencies and evaluation in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 2011 I.E. international conference on semantic computing (ICSC ᾿11). Palo Alto, CA, pp 275–278Google Scholar
  19. Gomes AK, Pimentel MdGC (2011d) A technique for human-readable representation and evaluation of media-based social interactions in social networks. In: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian symposium on multimedia and the Web (WebMedia ᾿11), pp 119–126Google Scholar
  20. Gomes AK, Pimentel MdGC (2011e) Um método para análise de interações sociais na web social como regras se-então (in portuguese). In: Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social (WAIHCWS ᾿11) no X Simpósio Brasileiro de Fatores Humanos em Sistemas de Computação (IHC ᾿11)Google Scholar
  21. Gomes AK, Pimentel MGC (2012a) Measuring media-based social interactions in online civic mobilization against corruption in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the 18th Brazilian symposium on multimedia and the Web (WebMedia ᾿12). ACM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Gomes AK, Pimentel MGC (2012b) A media-based social interactions analysis procedure. In: Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on applied computing (SAC ᾿12). ACM, New York, NY, pp 1018–1024Google Scholar
  23. Gomes AK, Pedrosa DdC, Pimentel MdGC (2011) Evaluating asynchronous sharing of links and annotation sessions as social interactions on internet videos. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/IPSJ international symposium on applications and the internet (SAINT ᾿11). Munich, pp 184–189Google Scholar
  24. Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):13–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Han J, Kamber M (2005) Data mining: concepts and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1970) A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. Am J Sociol 76(3):492–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jin X, Gallagher A, Cao L, Luo J, Han J (2010) The wisdom of social multimedia: using flickr for prediction and forecast. In: ACM international conference on multimedia (MM ᾿10). ACM, New York, pp 1235–1244Google Scholar
  28. Kleinberg J (2000) The small-world phenomenon: an algorithm perspective. In: ACM symposium on theory of computing (STOC). ACM, New York, pp 163–170Google Scholar
  29. Lavrac N, Flach PA, Zupan B (1999) Rule evaluation measures: a unifying view. In: International workshop on inductive logic programming (ILP). Springer, London, pp 174–185Google Scholar
  30. Martínez-Ballesteros M, Riquelme JC (2011) Analysis of measures of quantitative association rules. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on hybrid artificial intelligent systems - part II. Springer, Berlin, pp 319–326Google Scholar
  31. Mattaini M (1995) Contingency diagrams as teaching tools. J Behav Anal 18:93–98Google Scholar
  32. Mechner F (1959) A notation system for the description of behavioral procedures. J Exp Anal Behav 2:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mechner F (2008) Behavioral contingency analysis. J Behav Process 78(2):124–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mislove A, Marcon M, Gummadi KP, Druschel P, Bhattacharjee B (2007) Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In: ACM conference on internet measurement (ICM). ACM, New York, pp 29–42Google Scholar
  35. Negoescu R-A, Adams B, Phung D, Venkatesh S, Gatica-Perez D (2009) Flickr hypergroups. In: ACM international conference on multimedia (MM ᾿09). ACM, New York, pp 813–816Google Scholar
  36. Rummel R (1976) Social behavior and interaction – chapter 9. In: Sage Publications (ed) Understanding conflict and war – the conflict. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott JP (2000) Social network analysis: a handbook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousands Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  38. Shi X, Li Y, Yu P (2011) Collective prediction with latent graphs, In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management. New York, NY, pp 1127–1136Google Scholar
  39. Skinner BF (1953) Science and human behavior. New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Kumar V (2005) Introduction to data mining. Addison Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. Tan S, Bu J, Chen C, Xu B, Wang C, He X (2011) Using rich social media information for music recommendation via hypergraph model. In: ACM transactions on multimedia computing, communications, and applications (TOMCCAP), 7S, pp 22:1–22:22Google Scholar
  42. Bourlard H, Vinciarelli A, Pantic M (2009) Social signal processing: survey of an emerging domain. Image Vis Comput 27:1743–1759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watts DJ (1999) Small worlds: the dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  45. Weingarten K, Mechner F (1966) The contingency as an independent variable of social interaction. In: Verhave T (ed) Readings of experimental analysis of behavior. Appleton Century Crofts, New York, pp 447–459Google Scholar
  46. Wilkinson D, Thelwall M (2011) Researching personal information on the public Web. Soc Sci Comput Rev 29(4):387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wilson C, Boe B, Sala A, Puttaswamy KP, Zhao BY (2009) User interactions in social networks and their implications. In: ACM European conference on computer systems. ACM, New York, pp 205–218Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan Keller Gomes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel
    • 2
  1. 1.Federal Institute of Goiás—IFG, College of InhumasInhumasBrazil
  2. 2.University of São Paulo, Institute of Mathematics and Computer ScienceSão CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations