Skip to main content

An Assessment of Contagion on Social Networking Sites

  • Conference paper
  • 1985 Accesses

Abstract

Social network influence has been recognized as an important determinant for consumer behaviour. Through a web-based survey using restaurant consumption as a research context, this study explores social influence resulting from two distinct social reference processes: communication and comparison. The relationship between social interactions and social influence is moderated by opinion leadership and attitude towards status consumption, which are conceptualized to represent consumers’ competitiveness. Consumers’ status consumption contributes negatively to recommendation-based consumption, but positively to competitionbased consumption. In other words, the more competitive the consumers are, the less they tend to follow others’ recommendation, the more they consume products and services to establish or maintain their status in the social network. Several managerial implications are provided.

Keywords

  • territoriality
  • mobility
  • location-based media
  • mobile technology

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Amaldoss, W. & Jain, S. (2005). Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Science 56 (4): 621–644.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W.O. & Rose, R.L. (1990). Attention to social comparison information: An individual difference factor affecting consumer conformity. Journal of Consumer Research 16: 461–471.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bothner, M.S. (2003). Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth generation processor in the global computer industry. American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 1175–1210.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. J. & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and wordof-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 14: 350–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287–1335.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Buunk, B. P. & Mussweiler, T. (2001). New directions in social comparison research. European Journal of Social Psychology 31: 467–475.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, G. & Jeanne, O. (1994). Conspicuous Consumption and the Existence of Upward Sloping Demand Curves. Discussion Paper Serie A 461. University of Bonn, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bruyn, A. & Lilien, G. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence. International Journal of Research in Marketing 25: 151–163.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. (2008). Word of mouth and viral marketing: taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25(3): 179–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7: 117–140.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, E. L. & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behaviour: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing 31(4): 22–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison-Walker, L. J., (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research 4(1): 60–75.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S. (2010). Viral marketing — Establishing customer relationships by “word-of-mouse.” Electronic Markets 10(3): 158–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. & Gremler. D.D. (2004), Electronic word-ofmouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1): 38–52.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T. & Walsh, G. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth: Consequences of and motives for reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8 (2): 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, R., Han, S. & Gupta, S. (2009). Do Friends Influence Purchases in a Social Network? Harvard Business School Working Paper 09-123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdhury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11): 2169–2188.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, G. & Khan, N. (2005). Susceptibility to informational social influence on purchase decisions of designer label apparel: The mediating role of gender. The Business Review 4(1): 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy I. P. & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons 54:241–251.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leenders, R. T. A. J. (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24: 21–47.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. F. (1988). Frames of mind in inter-temporal choice. Management Science 34(2): 200–214.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M., Plangger, K. & Bal, A. (2011). The new WTP: Willingness to participate. Business Horizons 54(3): 219–229.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steffes, E. M. & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research 19(1): 42–59.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. C. (2011). Consumer Engagement in Mobile Social Networking Activities. Unpublished Masters Project. Temple University, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research 24: 258–270.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilton, R.D., Paez, A. & Scott, D. M. (2011). Why do you care what other people think? A qualitative investigation of social contact and telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 55(4): 269–282.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L.-L. & Lee, L. (2008). Online social comparison: Implications derived from Web 2.0. Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Suzhou: July 3-7, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, L, Teng, L. & Poon, P.S. (2008). Susceptibility to global consumer culture: A threedimensional scale. Psychology & Marketing 25(4): 336–351.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tussyadiah, I.P. (2012). An Assessment of Contagion on Social Networking Sites. In: Fuchs, M., Ricci, F., Cantoni, L. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2012. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1142-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1142-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-1141-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-1142-0