An Assessment of Contagion on Social Networking Sites

  • Iis P. Tussyadiah
Conference paper


Social network influence has been recognized as an important determinant for consumer behaviour. Through a web-based survey using restaurant consumption as a research context, this study explores social influence resulting from two distinct social reference processes: communication and comparison. The relationship between social interactions and social influence is moderated by opinion leadership and attitude towards status consumption, which are conceptualized to represent consumers’ competitiveness. Consumers’ status consumption contributes negatively to recommendation-based consumption, but positively to competitionbased consumption. In other words, the more competitive the consumers are, the less they tend to follow others’ recommendation, the more they consume products and services to establish or maintain their status in the social network. Several managerial implications are provided.


territoriality mobility location-based media mobile technology 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ajzen, I. (1985). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amaldoss, W. & Jain, S. (2005). Reference groups and product line decisions: An experimental investigation of limited editions and product proliferation. Management Science 56 (4): 621–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bearden, W.O. & Rose, R.L. (1990). Attention to social comparison information: An individual difference factor affecting consumer conformity. Journal of Consumer Research 16: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bothner, M.S. (2003). Competition and social influence: The diffusion of the sixth generation processor in the global computer industry. American Journal of Sociology 108(6): 1175–1210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. J. & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and wordof-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research 14: 350–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burt, R.S. (1982). Toward a Structural Theory of Action: Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, R.S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology 92: 1287–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buunk, B. P. & Mussweiler, T. (2001). New directions in social comparison research. European Journal of Social Psychology 31: 467–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corneo, G. & Jeanne, O. (1994). Conspicuous Consumption and the Existence of Upward Sloping Demand Curves. Discussion Paper Serie A 461. University of Bonn, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  10. De Bruyn, A. & Lilien, G. (2008). A multi-stage model of word-of-mouth influence. International Journal of Research in Marketing 25: 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferguson, R. (2008). Word of mouth and viral marketing: taking the temperature of the hottest trends in marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing 25(3): 179–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7: 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Grubb, E. L. & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behaviour: A theoretical approach. Journal of Marketing 31(4): 22–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison-Walker, L. J., (2001). The measurement of word-of-mouth communication and an investigation of service quality and customer commitment as potential antecedents. Journal of Service Research 4(1): 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Helm, S. (2010). Viral marketing — Establishing customer relationships by “word-of-mouse.” Electronic Markets 10(3): 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. & Gremler. D.D. (2004), Electronic word-ofmouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1): 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hennig-Thurau, T. & Walsh, G. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth: Consequences of and motives for reading customer articulations on the internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8 (2): 51–74.Google Scholar
  19. Iyengar, R., Han, S. & Gupta, S. (2009). Do Friends Influence Purchases in a Social Network? Harvard Business School Working Paper 09-123.Google Scholar
  20. Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K. & Chowdhury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11): 2169–2188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan, G. & Khan, N. (2005). Susceptibility to informational social influence on purchase decisions of designer label apparel: The mediating role of gender. The Business Review 4(1): 32–36.Google Scholar
  22. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy I. P. & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons 54:241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leenders, R. T. A. J. (2002). Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: Constructing the weight matrix. Social Networks 24: 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loewenstein, G. F. (1988). Frames of mind in inter-temporal choice. Management Science 34(2): 200–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parent, M., Plangger, K. & Bal, A. (2011). The new WTP: Willingness to participate. Business Horizons 54(3): 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steffes, E. M. & Burgee, L. E. (2009). Social ties and online word of mouth. Internet Research 19(1): 42–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tang, J. C. (2011). Consumer Engagement in Mobile Social Networking Activities. Unpublished Masters Project. Temple University, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of Marketing Research 24: 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilton, R.D., Paez, A. & Scott, D. M. (2011). Why do you care what other people think? A qualitative investigation of social contact and telecommuting. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 55(4): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu, L.-L. & Lee, L. (2008). Online social comparison: Implications derived from Web 2.0. Proceedings of the 12th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. Suzhou: July 3-7, 2008.Google Scholar
  31. Zhou, L, Teng, L. & Poon, P.S. (2008). Susceptibility to global consumer culture: A threedimensional scale. Psychology & Marketing 25(4): 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iis P. Tussyadiah
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Tourism & Hospitality ManagementTemple UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations