Skip to main content

European identity, technology and society. The case for space

  • Chapter
European Identity through Space

Part of the book series: Studies in Space Policy ((STUDSPACE,volume 9))

  • 756 Accesses

Abstract

Science and technology are clearly areas that have contributed to the notion of Europe as they are integral parts of its cultural heritage. The question is whether European culture was determined by technology development or not. The immediate answer is “no”, because we generally cannot state a strong causal relation between technological and social development by simply assuming a social shaping role of technology. On the other hand, this relation cannot be reduced to a mere co-incidence of technology and society without any mutual constraints. The truth lies in between in terms of a weak coherence of both with respect to a conditional relation between technology and society. Technology is clearly — but not exclusively — a cultural practice and as such it might push societal development among other non-technological practices. On the other hand, technology is governed by society in nearly every phase of its development and diffusion, e.g., by funding research and specific projects or by regulating certain applications. The resulting co-evolution of society and technology means that European culture and identity cannot be simply shaped by ambitious technology development — but may gain from corresponding incentives, when development conditions for technology and society are integrated appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Moreover, the “utilitarian fallacy” in reasoning about space activities might also raise false expectations and respective disappointments, which — in the end — might even affect the spirit of spaceflight: see Lingner, Stephan. “Human Spaceflight as a Matter of Culture and National Vision.” Humans in Outer Space — Interdisciplinary Odysseys. Luca Codignola and Kai-Uwe Schrogl (eds.) Wien New York: Springer 2008: 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Butler, Samuel. “The Atlas of Ancient and Classical Geography.” 21 November 2005. The Project Gutenberg EBook. EBook #17124. 20 October 2010. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/17124/17124-h/17124-h.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Cobet, Justus. „Wie weit reicht Europa und was heißt Europa? February 1998. Newsletter no. 8. Europäische Akademie Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH. 20 October 2010. http://www.ea-aw.de/fileadmin/downloads/Newsletter/NL_08_021998.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Kant, Immanuel. „Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?“ Berlinische Monatsschrift (Dec. 1784): 481–494. 20 October 2010. http://www.uni-potsdam.de/u/philosophie/texte/kant/aufklaer.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Funtowicz, Silvio, and Jerry Ravetz. Post-Normal Science. Science and Governance under Conditions of Complexity. Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Michael Decker (ed.) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 2001: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Carrier, Martin. “Business as Usual: On the Prospects of Normality in Scientific Research.” Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Michael Decker (ed.) Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer 2001: 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See “The Debate over Assessing Technology: Congress wants to set up an office to evaluate the impact of New Developments.” 8 April 1972. Business Week. 20 October 2010. http://www.princeton.edu/~ota/ns20/ota72_f.html.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gethmann, Carl Friedrich: „Letztbegründung.“ Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Joachim Ritter, Karlfried Gründer and Gottfried Gabriel (ed.). Vol 5. Basel: Schwabe 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mendell, Wendell W. (ed.): “Lunar Bases and Space Activities of the 21st Century.” Houston: Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1985. See also: Stöffler, Dieter: „Die Erde in eine offene Welt verwandeln.“ Wirtschaft & Wissenschaft Mai 2/99 (1999): 38–47.

    Google Scholar 

  10. „Flying high.“ The Economist, 12 September 2009: 83–84.

    Google Scholar 

  11. „L’Europe regarde vers la Lune et Mars.“ Le Figaro, 24 October 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Monastersky, Richard. “Shooting for the Moon.” Nature 460 (2009): 314–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lingner, S. (2012). European identity, technology and society. The case for space. In: Venet, C., Baranes, B. (eds) European Identity through Space. Studies in Space Policy, vol 9. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0976-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0976-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0976-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics