Skip to main content

High Precision Radiosurgery and Technical Standards

  • Conference paper
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 91))

  • 129 Accesses

Summary

Background. A high degree of precision and accuracy in radiosurgery is a fundamental requirement for therapeutic success. Small radiation fields and steep dose gradients are clinically applied thus necessitating a dedicated quality assurance program in order to guarantee dosimetric and geometric accuracy.

Material and methods. A detailed analysis of the course of treatm ent independent of the irradiation technique used results in the so-called chain of uncertainties in radiosurgery (immobilisatio n, imaging, treat ment planning system, definition of regions of interest, mechanical accuracy, dose plann ing, dose verificatio n). Each link in this chain is analysed for accuracy and the established quality assurance procedu res are discussed. A “System Test” was used to check the whole chain of uncertainties simultaneously.

Results. The tests described are compatible with published reports on quality assurance in radiosurgery. In terms of accuracy the weakest link in the chain of uncert aint ies is stereotactic MR imaging. Geometric overall accuracy measured in the “System Test” is less than 0.7 mm.

Conclusion. The established quality assurance routin es have clinically been validated. MR imaging dominates geometric overa ll accuracy in radiosurgery, which can be limited to less than 1 mm by an adequate quality assurance protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexander III E. Loeffler JS, Lunsford LD (1993) Stereotactic radiosurge ry. McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bourland JD. McCollough KP (1994) Static field conforma l stereotactic radiosurgery: physical techniques. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 28: 471–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardinale RM, Benedict SH. Wu Q. Zwicker RD. Gaballa HE. Mohan R (1998) A compa rison of three stereotac tic radiot herapy techniques: ARCS vs. noncoplan ar fixed fields vs. intensity modulation. Int J Radi at Oncol Biol Phys 42: 431–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. DIN 6875-1 (2004) Spezielle Bestrahlungseinrichtungen-Teil I: Perkut ane stereota ktische Bestrahlung. Kennmerkmale und besondere Prüfrnethoden. No rmena usschuss Radiologie (NAR ) im DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V., Beuth Verlag. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engler MJ. Curran BH. Tsai JS. Sternick ES. Selles WD. Wazer DE. Mason WP. Sailor T. Mackie TR (1994) Fine tun ing of linear accelerator accessories for stereotactic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Bioi Phys 28: 1001–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ertl A. Saringer W. Heimberger K. Kindl P (1999) Quality assurance for the Leksell gamma unit: cons idering magnetic resonance image-distortion and delineation failure in the targeting of the internal auditory canal. Med Phys 26: 166–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman WA. Buatti JM. Bova FJ. Mendenhall WM (1997) Linac radiosurgery-a practical guide. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hartmann GH (1995) Quality assura nce prog ram on stereotactic radiosurgery. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. IEC 60601-2-11 (1997) Medical elect rical equipment-part 2: particular requirements for the safety of gamma beam therapy equipment. International Electro technical Commission. Technical Committee No 62. Electr ical Equip ment in medical practice

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jess A. Kreiner HJ. Heck B. Wowra B. Mack A (2003) Bestrahlungsplanung bei kleinen complex geformten Läsionen und ihre exper imentelle Verifikation. Z Med Phys 13: 16–21

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lomax NJ. Scheib SG (2003) Quant ifying the degree of conformity in radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55: 1409–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mack A, Mack G, Weltz D, Scheib S, Böttcher H, Seifert V (2003) High precision film dosimetry with GAFCHROMIC® films for quality assurance when using small fields. Med Phys 30: 2399–2409

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mack A, Mack G, Weltz D, Hones A, Jess A. Wowra B. Czempiel H, Heck B, Kreiner HJ, Seifert V, Böttcher H (2003) Qualitätssicherung im stereotaktischen Raum. Bestimmung der Genauigkeit von Ort und Dosis bei Einzeit-Bestrahlungen. Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 179:760–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mack A (2002) Verification of dose plans using film dosimetry for quality assurance in radiosurgery. In: Kondziolka D (ed) Radiosurgery. Karger, Basel. vol4, pp 213–227

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mack A, Czempiel H, Kreiner HJ, Durr G, Wowra B (2002) Quality assurance in stereotactic space, a system test for verifying the accuracy of aim in radiosurgery. Med Phys 29: 561–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mack A, Weltz D, Czempiel H, Beck B, Kreiner HJ, Wolff R. Mack G (2002) Experimentally determined 3-d dose distributions of small, complex targets. J Neurosurg [Suppl] 5(97): 551–555

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mack A, Scheib SG, Major J, Gianolini S, Pazmandi G. Feist H, Czempiel H, Kreiner HJ (2002) Precision dosimetry for narrow photon beams used in radiosurgery-determination of gamma knife output factors. Med Phys 29: 2080–2089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maitz AH, Wu A, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Bloomer WD (1995) Quality assurance for gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 32: 1465–1471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Phillips MH (1993) Physical aspects of stereotactic radiosurgery. Plenum Medical Book Company, New York London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramaseshan R, Heydarian M (2003) Comprehensive quality assurance for stereotactic radiosurgery treatments. Phys Med Biol 48: N199–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosenzweig DP, Schell MC, Numaguchi Y (1998) Quality assurance in linac-based stereot actic radiosurgery and radiotherapy. Med Dosim 23: 147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schad LR, Ehricke HH. Wowra B et al (1992) Correction of spatial distortion in magnetic resonance angiography for radiosurgical treatment planning of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Magn Reson Imaging 10:609–621

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Scheib SG. Gianolini S. Haller D. Wellis GN, Siegried J (2000) VOLUMESERIES: a software tool for target volume follow-up studies with computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg [Suppl] 3(93): 203–207

    Google Scholar 

  24. Scheib SG, Gianolini S (2002) Methodology of threedimensional dosimetric dose verification in radiosurgery. In: Kondziolka D (ed) Radiosurgery. Karger, Basel, vol 4, pp 203–212

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Scheib SG. Gianolini S (2002) Three-dimensional dose verification using BANG gel: a clinical example. J Neurosurg [Suppl] 5(97): 582–587

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scheib SG. Mack A. Lomax NJ. Gianolini S, Hones A. Rieker M. Weltz D (2003) Quality assurance in stereotactic radiosurgery according E-DIN 6875-1. Proceedings of the joint meeting of the Swiss Society of Radiation Biology and Medical Physics and the Scientific Association of Swiss Radiation Oncology. Geneva. April 3–5

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schell MC. Bova FJ, Larson DA, Leavitt DD, Lutz WR, Podgorsak A, Wu A (1995) AAPM Report No. 54. Stereotactic radiosurgery. Report of Task Group 42. American Institute of Physics, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wowra B. Czempiel H, Cibis R. Horstmann GA (1997) Profil der ambulanten Radiochirurgie mit dem Gamma-Knife-System. Teil I: Methode und multizentrisches Bestrahlungskonzept. Radiologe 37: 995–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Scheib Ph.D .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Scheib, S.G., Gianolini, S., Lomax, N.J., Mack, A. (2004). High Precision Radiosurgery and Technical Standards. In: Wowra, B., Muacevic, A., Tonn, JC. (eds) Gamma Knife Radiosurgery. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 91. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0583-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0583-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7200-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0583-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics