Skip to main content

When tourists give their reasons on the web: The argumentative significance of tourism related UGC

  • Conference paper
Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2011

Abstract

This paper proposes an innovative approach to the study of UGC based on the theory of argumentation, an ancient discipline which, since the half of last century, is receiving an increasing attention from a wide number of subject areas. A pilot study is presented where an argumentative analysis of UGC related to a specific destination — Lugano — has been conducted, with the aim of finding out the reasons why a tourism experience becomes worth to be communicated. In particular, the argumentative analysis allowed to highlight the touristic value of the destination, which decisively influences its reputation and can be exploited, therefore, for its better promotion on the market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Christopher Guerra, S. (2008). Themen, Thesen und Argumente zur Position des Italienischen in der viersprachigen Schweiz. Studies in Communication Sciences 8(1): 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ascaniis, S, Cantoni, L. & Tardini, S. (2010). Argumentation in Tourism: an analysis of User-Generated-Contents about Lugano (Switzerland). In F. van Eemeren (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSA 2010, the 7th International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam, June 29 to July 2, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, G. (2008). Creating better corporate reputations: an Australian perspective. In T. C. Melewar (Ed.), Facets of Corporate Identity, Communication and Reputation (pp. 178–196). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eeemeren, F.H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. The pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge University Press, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eeemeren, F.H. van & Houtlosser, P. (2009). Strategic Maneuvering examining Argumentation in Context. In F.H. van Eemeren (Eds.), Examining Argumentation in Context: Fifteen Studies on Strategic Maneuvering, Amsterdam: John Benjamin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gretzel, U. (2006). Consumer-Generated Content — trends and implications for branding. E-Review of Tourism Research 4(3): 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inversini A., Marchiori E., Dedekind C. & Cantoni L. (2010). Applying a Conceptual Framework to Analyze Online Reputation of Tourism Destinations. In Gretzel et al. (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2010. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, B., MacLaurin, T. & Crotts, J. C. (2007). Travel blogs and the implications for destination marketing. Journal of Travel Research 46(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti E. (2006). Relevance of Context-bound loci to Topical Potential in the Argumentation Stage. Argumentation 20: 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti E. & Greco Morasso S. (2009). Argumentation as an object of interest and as a social and cultural resource. In N. Muller-Mirza & A.N. Perret-Clermont (Eds.), Argumentation and Education, New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigotti E. & Greco Morasso S. (2010). Comparing the Argumentum Model of Topics to Other Contemporary Approaches to Argument Schemes: The Procedural and Material Components. Argumentation 24(4): 489–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocci, A. (2008). Modality and its conversational backgrounds in the reconstruction of argumentation. Argumentation 22(2): 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snoeck Henkemans, F. (1997). Analysing complex argumentation. Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2001). Argumentation structures. In F. H. Van Eemeren (Ed.), Crucial concepts in argumentation theory (pp. 101–134), Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tardini, S. (2005). Endoxa and communities: grounding enthymematic arguments. Studies in Communication Sciences. Special issue 5/1, 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, D. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiang, Z. & Gretzel, U. (2009). Role of social media in online travel information search. Tourism Management 31(2): 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Ascaniis, S., Morasso, S.G. (2011). When tourists give their reasons on the web: The argumentative significance of tourism related UGC. In: Law, R., Fuchs, M., Ricci, F. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2011. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0503-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0503-0_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0502-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0503-0

Publish with us

Policies and ethics