Advertisement

Coded Cultures pp 280-303 | Cite as

Ludic Chindogus as Erotic Toys—Pleasure, Play, and Politics Beyond Materialism

  • Margarete Jahrmann
Part of the Edition Angewandte book series (EDITION)

Abstract

This paper introduces a number of conceptual key terms around the art and politics of play, as Jouissance, Playsure, Ludic Chindogu Interfaces and Ludics. The joyful and even erotic play with the technological Chindogu (Kawakami 1995) as an artifact is understood as a way to gain an immaterial perspective on Ludic Interfaces as political tools, which can be identified as seminal practice for the development of a critical consciousness through play. Jouissance as discussed by Julia Kristeva (Kristeva, 1984) and Slavoj □ i□ (K□i□ ek, 2005) is useful as technical term from cultural studies and in particular from the perspective of political theories, in order to emphasize the quality of enjoyment and erotic attraction in the agency dimension of play with an object. The contemporary slave and master relation of players in everyday life and their relation to their technological objects can be identified throughout the paper as related to concepts of play and desire as driving forces for social agency in everyday life that really matters! The emergence of Ludics as art form is informed by the practice based research in the Internet of Things, expressed in Urban Games and Gamefashion.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Broeckmann, A.: ≫Minor Media—Heterogenic Machines≪. In: Chimères No. 42. Paris: Printemps, 2001 Google Scholar
  2. Critical Art Ensemble: The Technology of Uselessness. New York: Ctheory, 1994 Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, J.: ≫Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences≪. In: Bass, A. (Ed.): Writing and Difference. London: Routledge, 1978 Google Scholar
  4. Eco, U.: Towards a Semiological Guerilla Warfare: Travels in Hyperreality. London: Picador, 1987 Google Scholar
  5. Fiske, J.: Understanding Popular Culture. London: Routledge, 1989 Google Scholar
  6. Frasca, G.: ≫Videogames of the Oppressed: Critical Thinking, Education, Tolerance, and Other Issues≪. In: Harrigan, P., Wardrip-Fruin, N. (Eds.): First Person. New Media as Story, Performance, and Game. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003 Google Scholar
  7. Gibson, J.: ≫The Theory of Affordances≪. In: Shaw, R., Bransford, J. (Eds.): Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977 Google Scholar
  8. Heidegger, M.: Die Frage nach dem Ding: zu Kants Lehre nach den Transzendentalen Grundsätzen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1984 Google Scholar
  9. Juul, J.: ≫The Game, the Player, the World: Looking for a Heart of GamenessIn: Copier, M., Raessens, J. (Eds.): Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2003 Google Scholar
  10. Kawakami, K.: 101 Unuseless Japanese Inventions: The Ten Tenets of Chindogu. New York: W.W. Norton & Co, 1995 Google Scholar
  11. Kristeva, J.: Revolution in Poetic Language. New York: Columbia University Press, 1984 Google Scholar
  12. Latour, B.: Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Berkshire: Open University Press, 1987 Google Scholar
  13. Pfaller, R.: Die Ilusion der Anderen. Über das Lustprinzip in der Kultur. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2002 Google Scholar
  14. Pias, C.: Computer Spiel Welten. Dissertation. Weimar: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar, 2000 Google Scholar
  15. Safo, P.: Sensors: The Next Wave of Innovation. New York: ACM, 1997 Google Scholar
  16. Senneth, R.: The Craftsman. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 2008 Google Scholar
  17. Sterling, B.: Shaping Things. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005 Google Scholar
  18. □i□ek, S.: Mehr-Genießen. Lacan in der Populärkultur. Vienna: Turia und Kant, 1992 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margarete Jahrmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations