Skip to main content

A Conversation with Florian Beigel and Philip Christou

Ellis Woodman, London, April 2010

  • Chapter
Architecture as city
  • 1307 Accesses

Abstract

EW: I would like to begin by quoting from a statement that Rem Koolhaas made in 1987 in relation to OMA’s entry in the competition for the French new town of Melun-Sénart. It reads as follows:

‘The site of this last Parisian Ville Nouvelle of Melun-Sénart is too beautiful to conceive just as another Ville Nouvelle with innocence and impunity. A second type of innocence is required to believe at the end of this century that urban development and built areas can be projected and then reasonably controlled. The built, ‘the full’, is incontrollable — subjected to the maelstrom of political, financial and cultural forces — in a perpetual transformation. Of the void the same is not true; maybe the void is the subject where architectural certitudes are still convincing.’ 1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 pringer-Verlag/Vienna

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beigel, F., Christou, P. (2010). A Conversation with Florian Beigel and Philip Christou. In: Architecture as city. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0368-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0368-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0367-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0368-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics