Re-Connect

  • Angelika Hilbeck

Abstract

We are currently experiencing the simultaneous decline of essentially all fundamental systems human societies rest upon. As the climate undergoes dramatic changes and biodiversity still disappears at unprecedented rates, our economic, health and food production systems also falter.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bioscience Resource Project, 2007 ‘The agenda gap in science’, February, accessed 18 March 2010, 〈http://www.bioscienceresource.org/commentaries/article.php?id=13〉.Google Scholar
  2. Editors, Scientific American 2009, ‘Do seed companies Control GM crop research?’, August, accessed 18 March 2010, 〈http://www.scientificamerican.com/ article.cfm?id=do-seed-companies-control-gm-cropresearch〉.Google Scholar
  3. Etzkowitz, H 2005, ‘The rise of the entrepreneurial university’, International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, vol. 42, pp. 28–43.Google Scholar
  4. Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) 2009, ‘The state of food insecurity in the world: Economic crises — impacts and lessons learned’, Rome, accessed 18 March 2010, 〈http://www.eeo.ed.ac.uk/postgraduate/MSc/envdev/intdev/files/FAO_food_security_2009.pdf〉.Google Scholar
  5. Fussell, B 1992, The story of corn, University of New Mexico Press, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  6. IAASTD Global Report 2009, ‘Agriculture at a Crossroads’, B McIntyre, H Herren, J Wakhungu & RT Watson, (eds).Google Scholar
  7. Kenner, R 2009, ‘Exploring the corporate power behind the way we eat: the making of Food Inc’, in K Weber (ed.), Food, Inc.: How industrial food is making us sicker, fatter and poorer, and what you can do about it: a participant guide, Participant Media, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Krimsky, S 2003, Science in the private interest: Has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? Rowman & Littlefield. Lanham/MD.Google Scholar
  9. Lacy, S (ed.) 1995, Mapping the terrain: New genre public art, Bay Press, Seattle/WA, p. 126.Google Scholar
  10. Lotter, D 2009a, ‘The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science — Part 1: The development of a flawed enterprise’, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food, vol. 16, pp. 31–49.Google Scholar
  11. Lotter, D 2009b, ‘The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science — Part 2: Academic capitalism and the loss of scientific integrity’, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food vol. 16, pp. 50–68.Google Scholar
  12. Michaels, D 2008, Doubt is their product, Oxford University Press, also in Scientific American, vol. 292, June 2005, accessed 18 March2010, 〈http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=doubt-is-t heirproduct〉.Google Scholar
  13. Nestle, M 2007, Food Politics: How the food industry influences nutrition and health, University of California Press, London/UK.Google Scholar
  14. Patel, R 2008, Stuffed & starved: The hidden battle for the world food system, 398 edn, Melville House Publishing, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Pollack, A 2009, ‘Crop scientists say biotechnology seed companies are thwarting research’, New York Times, publ. 19 February, accessed 18 March 2010, 〈http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/business/20crop.html〉.Google Scholar
  16. Pollan, M 2008, In defense of food, Penguin, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Saitô, MW 2006, Engaging the public: Dialogical art and frameworks to collaborative environments, Momentarium, accessed 18 March 2010, 〈http://www.momentarium.org/research/collaboration.pdf〉.Google Scholar
  18. Slaughter, S & Rhoades, G 2004, Academic capitalism and new economy: Markets, state, and higher education, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore/MD.Google Scholar
  19. Snow, AA, Andow, DA, Gepts, P, Hallerman, EM, Power, A, Tiedje, JM & Wolfenbarger, LL 2005, ‘Genetically engineered organisms and the environment: Current status and recommendations’, Ecological Applications, vol. 15, pp. 377–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Waltz, E 2009a, ‘GM crops: Battlefield’, Nature, vol. 461, pp. 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Waltz, E 2009b, ‘Under wraps’, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 27, pp. 880–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Welsh, R & Glenna, L 2007, ‘Considering the role of the university in conducting research on agri-biotechnologies’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 36, pp. 929–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angelika Hilbeck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations