Objects in Sociology

Part of the Edition Angewandte book series (EDITION)


it has been a mystery to me why my fellow sociologists have paid so little attention to objects — to their creation, design, and the specifics of their consumption. If they write about mass-produced goods at all, sociologists tend to treat them as distractions from other putatively more worthwhile aspects of existence. We inherit as a Freud-Marx blend, a vision of consumer goods as fetish. Stuff provides noxious evidence of corrupted sensibilities, hegemonic oppression, or false needs. Thorsten Veblen, foreshadowing the French social theorist Pierre Bourdieu (1984), warned of conspicuous consumption and the role of elites in using the consumption apparatus to set up anxieties that reinforced elite dominance over everyday life. Depending on the telling, for the poor as well as the strivers somewhat higher-up, symbolic ‘come-ons’ ensnare.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arthur, W. B. 1988. Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms in Economics. In P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow, and D. Pines (Eds.), The Economy as an Evolving Complex System: 9–32. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Bazerman, C. 1999. The Language of Edison’s Light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, H. and J. Walton. 1976. Social Science and the Work of Hans Haacke. In J. Burham and H. Haacke (Eds.), Framing and Being Framed: 145–152. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, H. 1995. The Power of Inertia. Qualitative Sociology 18, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Bijker, W. E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bittner, E. 1983. Technique and the Conduct of Life. Social Problems 30(3), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bohlen, C. 1999. Raise Gorbachev, the Chic Soviet First Lady of the Glasnost Era, Is Dead at 67. New York Times, 21 September.Google Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, J. and P. Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, M. 1991. Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters: 132–164. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Chapin, F. S. 1928. A Quantitative Scale for Rating the Home and Social Environment of Middle Class Families in an Urban Community. Journal of Educational Psychology 19(2), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciccarone, D. and P. Bourgois. Explaining the Geographic Variation of HIV Among Injection Drug Users in the United States. Substance Use & Misuse 38(14), 2049–2063.Google Scholar
  13. Cranz, G. 1999. The Chair. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and E. Rochberg-Halton. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. David, P. 1985. Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
  16. David, P. 1997. Path Dependence and the Case for Historical Economics: One More Chorus of the Ballad of QWERTY. University of Oxford Discussion Paper in Economic and Social History 20, 3–47.Google Scholar
  17. DeParle, J. 2007. Restive Foreign Workers Have Fearful Dubai Eyeing Reform. New York Times, 6 August, A8.Google Scholar
  18. Douglas, M. and B. Isherwood. 1982. The World of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  19. Duneier, M. 1994. Slim’s Table. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Featherstone, M. 1992. Postmodernism and the Aesthetisization of Everyday Life. In S. Lash and J. Friedman (Eds.), Modernity and Identity: 265–291. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gladwell, M. 2002. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Santa Ana, CA: Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
  23. Goffman, E. 1971. Relations in Public. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar
  24. Halle, D. 1996. Inside Culture. Berkeley: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harper, D. 1992. Working Knowledge: Skill and Community in a Small Shop. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayden, D. 1995. Power of Place. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, T. 1989. American Genesis. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobs, J. 1961. Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  29. Latour, B. and J. Johnson. 1988. Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer. Social Problems 35(3), 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latour, B. 1992. Where Are the Missing Masses. In W. E. Bijker and J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: 225–258. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Latour, B. 1996. Aramis, or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, B. 2007. Reassembling the Social. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Law, J. 1986. On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action, and Belief: 234–263. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lieberson, D. 2000. A Matter of Taste: How Names, Fashions, and Culture Change. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lubbock, J. 1995. The Tyranny of Taste. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lynd, R. and H. Lynd. 1937. Middletown in Transition. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, M. 1986. The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCauley, M. 1998. Gorbachev. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  39. Matthews, M. 1978. Privilege in the Soviet Union. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  40. McClain, N. Forthcoming 2010. If You See Something, Say Something, But How?: Mass Transit Security and Obstacles to Vigilance. PhD Diss. Department of Sociology, New York University.Google Scholar
  41. Miller, D. and S. Woodward. 2010. Global Denim. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  42. Molotch, H., W. Freudenburg, and K. Paulsen. 2000. History Repeats Itself, but How?: City Character, Urban Tradition, and the Accomplishment of Place. American Sociological Review 65, 791–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Molotch H. and N. McClain. 2008. Things at Work: Informal social-material mechanisms for getting the job done. Journal Of Consumer Culture 8(1), 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mukerji, C. 1997. Territorial Ambitions and the Gardens of Versailles. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Nippert-Eng, C. 1996. Home and Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Plummer, K. 2001 [1983]. Documents of Life: An Introduction to the Problems and Literature of a Humanistic Method. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Preda, A. 1999. The Turn to Things: Arguments for a Sociological Theory of Things. Sociological Quarterly 40(2), 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riggins, S. 2004. Fieldworkin the Living Room: An Autoethnographic Essay. In S. H. Riggins (Ed.), The Socialness of Things: 101–147. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Riesman, D. 1964. Abundance for What? New York: Garden City.Google Scholar
  51. Rudofsky, B. 1989. Now I Lay Me Down to Eat. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  52. Sewell, W. 1940. A memorandum on research in income and levels of living in the South: Revision of a memorandum prepared for consideration at the Sixth Annual Southern Social Science Research Conference, Chattanooga, TN, 7–9 March, in Stillwater, Oklahoma: Agricultural and Mechanical College.Google Scholar
  53. Shove, E., M. Watson, J. Ingram, and M. Hand. 2008. The Design of Everyday Life. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  54. Smith, C. S. 1980. From Art to Science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Strathern, M. 1996. Cutting the Network. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(3), 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thrift, N. 2007. Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Wakeford, N. 2003. A Research Note: Working with New Media’s Cultural Intermediaries. Information, Communication and Society 6(2), 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warner, W. L. 1949. Social Class in America. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
  59. Wharton, G. Forthcoming. Dynamics of Participatory Conservation: The Kamehameha Sculpture Project. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation.Google Scholar
  60. Zemtsov, I. 1985. The Private Life of the Soviet Elite. New York: Crane Russak.Google Scholar
  61. Zukin, S. 2005. Point of Purchase. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2011

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations