Skip to main content

Technology for the Future, Design for the Present? Reflections on the Ambient Assisted Living Technology Industry

  • Chapter
Design Anthropology

Part of the book series: Edition Angewandte ((EDITION))

  • 1469 Accesses

Abstract

this essay examines the emergence of a ‘proto-industry’ that is researching, designing, and building technology with a specific futures in mind. That future is one of a rapidly aging world in which technology plays a key role in supporting the needs and experiences of older people. This category of technologies is referred to as ambient assisted living technology, and it often takes form of ubiquitous computing, or Ubicomp, created for a particular type of older ‘user’. Despite the fact that this demographic aging is already a reality, and much of the technology required already exists, this industry typically frames its efforts in terms of a “proximate future” (Bell and Dourish 2006). Such a future is always just around the corner or coming into view over the horizon. In this brave new world, new technological capabilities and interaction models will allow older people to achieve their goals through seamless, ubiquitous computing experiences. I suggest that this frame of a proximate future creates a focus on technology development and overshadows the importance of social and cultural practice in the development of appropriate technological interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, M. 2000. The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility. Human-Computer Interaction 15(2), 179–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. 1994. Representation and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction 9(2), 151–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. and P. Dourish. 2006. Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. 2008. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, June, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cefkin, M. (Ed.). 2009. Ethnography and the Corporate Encounter: Reflections on Research in and of Corporations. Oxford: Bergahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. 2006. Implications for Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 2006, 24–27 April in Montreal, Canada: 541–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. 2007. Responsibilities and Implications: Further Thoughts on Ethnography and Design. Proc. ACM Conf. Designing for the User Experience DUX 2007, 5–7 November in Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, A. 2007. Design for Debate. http://we-make-money-not-art.com/archives/2007/04/now-this-is-get.php

  • Harper, R., A.S. Taylor, L. Swan, S. Izadi, A. Sellen, and M. Perry. 2006. Homes that make us smart. Pers Ubiquit Comput 11(5). doi 10.1007/s00779-006-0076-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jara, A., M. Zamora, and A. Skarmeta. 2009. An Architecture for Ambient Assisted Living and Health Environments. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5518, 882–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. 2010. Matt Jones on Mujicomp and Mujicompfrastructures at Technoark. http://liftlab.com/think/nova/2010/02/19/matt-jones-on-mujicomp-and-mujicompfrastructures-at-technoark/

  • Mackenzie, D. and J. Wajcman. 1985. The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, H. 2003. Where Stuff Comes From: How Toasters, Toilets, Cars, Computers, and Many Other Things Come to Be As They Are. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, S. 2010. The Fictions, Facts and Future of Older People and Technology. www.ilcuk.org.uk

  • Rydell, R. 1993. World of Fairs: the century-of-progress expositions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E. and M. Pantzer. 2005. Consumers, producers and practices: understanding the invention and reinvention of nordic walking. J. Consum. Cult. 5(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone, R. 1992. Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic spaces. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, P. L. and R. M. Denny. 2009. Doing Anthropology in Consumer Research. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolmie, P., A. Crabtree, S. Eggleston, J. Humble, C. Creenhalgh, and T. Rodden. 2009. Digital Plumbing: The Mundane Work of Deploying UbiComp in the Home. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14(3), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, Q., G. Calcaterra, and E. Mynatt. 2005. Cook’s Collage: DejaVu Display for a Home Kitchen in Proceedings of HOIT: Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics Conference: 15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiser M. 1991. The computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American 265(3), 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeford N. (Ed.). 2004. Innovation through people-centered design—lessons from the USA. Global Watch Mission Report. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberts, S. (2011). Technology for the Future, Design for the Present? Reflections on the Ambient Assisted Living Technology Industry. In: Clarke, A.J. (eds) Design Anthropology. Edition Angewandte. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0234-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-0234-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-0233-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-0234-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics