Skip to main content

Plants in Funeral Ceremonies in the Polish Countryside

  • Chapter
Ethnobotanik—Ethnobotany
  • 91 Accesses

Summary

Belief in the continued existence of souls after death was the reason why people searched for certain measures in which accessories taken from the plant world play a prominent role even today, although to a much smaller degree than thirty years ago. Most of all these measures have to ensure the best existence for souls in that world. Certain of them are to relieve the pain of dying people and to protect the living against the eventual visits of the dead souls. In these measures, blessed plants played a particular role, and also periwinkle (vinca minor L.) myrtle, asparagus, poppy seeds (papaver somniferun L.) and straw.

Zusammenfassung

Der Glaube an ein Weiterleben der Seele nach dem Tode bewog Menschen zu bestimmten Vorkehrungen, bei denen Gegenstände aus dem Pflanzenreich eine überragender Bedeutung spielten, selbst bis auf den heutigen Tag, wenn auch nicht mehr so ausgeprägt. Die meisten dieser Maßnahmen zielten auf die möglichst günstigen Voraussetzungen für die Seelen dort. Einige sollten den Schmerz von Sterbenden verringern und die Überlebenden gegen überraschende Heimsuchungen durch die Seelen Verstorbener feien. Unter diesen Maßnahmen spielt das Segnen von Pflanzen eine große Rolle; dazu gehören Immergrün, Myrthe, Spargel, Mohnsamen und Stroh.

Résumé

La croyance en une survie de l’âme après la mort a incité les hommes à rechercher certains moyens dans lesquels des ingrédients empruntés au monde végétal ont joué continuent de jouer un rôle prépondérant, même si c’est à un moindre degré qu’il y a trente ans. La plupart de ces moyens ont pour but d’assurer une meilleure existence de l’âme en ce monde. Certains d’entre eux doivent atténuer les souffrances des mourants et protéger les vivants d’éventuelles atteintes des âmes des défunts. Des plantes sacrées y jouent un rôle particulier, entre autres la pervenche, la myrte, l’asperge, les graines de pavot et la paille. gm

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Footnotes

  1. At present the intensity of these practices (and also of similar ones which will be discussed in the latter part of this article) has significantly decreased. Already some of these practices remain only in human memory. These customs continue rather to the period of the end of the nineteenth century until World War II.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer A. 1921. Zwyczaje pogrzebowe ludu polskiego, Lwów, p. 74-80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Informant M. Zahuta, born 1898, Dębsko near Drawsko Pomorskie, comes from the Przemyśl voivodeship (archive of the Polish Ethnographic Atlas PAN in Wroclaw).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Most often mentioned is rye straw, see FISCHER A. (= 2).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer A. (2), p. 79. It is necessary however to point out that, according to the map prepared for publication by W. Sokół (to be published in Facicle 8, map number 457 of the Polish Ethnographic Atlas), the range of this custom’s appearance (concerning rye straw) encompasses Little Poland (Małopolska) in the interwar period and partly Mazovia and Podlasie (to the north up to the river Narew).

    Google Scholar 

  6. The villages Dzianisz and Zakopane. Gustawicz B., Podania i przesądy, gadki i nazwy ludowe w dziedzinie przyrody, Zbiór Wiadomości do Antropologii Krajowej, vol. 6, 1982, p. 279.

    Google Scholar 

  7. + (8) Fischer A. (2), p. 79.

    Google Scholar 

  8. = (2), p. 79, 80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. =(2), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E.G. informant M. Zahuta coming from Przemyśl voivodeship says: “it does not matter which herbs it is, but it must be blessed” (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocław).

    Google Scholar 

  11. The range of these practices clearly widened in the eastern direction. They were known, for example, in Wileńszczyzna, Podolia, a fact mentioned by transplanted persons from that side (informants: M. Ardukaniec, born 1905, from Suliszewo near Drawsko Pomorskie, J. Łukojć, born 1928, from Sławęcin near Choszczna, W. Salej, born 1930, from Kaława near Międzyrzecze-archive PAE PAN in Wrocław) and also in Samogitia (Zmudź)-Fischer A., op. cit., p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Poles practised this custom in Wileńszczyzna before World War II (informant: J. Łukojć).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karwicka T. 1979. Kultura ludowa ziemi dobrzyńskiej, Warszawa, p. 193.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dąbrowska S. 1902. Obrzędy religijne i zwyczaje. Pogrzeb, Wisła, vol. 16, p. 361.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fischer (2), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  16. =(2), p. 152.

    Google Scholar 

  17. =(2), p. 94-95.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This concerns rather the direct decking of the corpse: in the case of a coffin, only the interior.

    Google Scholar 

  19. About 1000 interviews carried out in the years 1969–1973 on the basis of a questionnaire prepared by J. Gajek.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wreath with thyme were also given, for example, or else bunches of southernwood. However, blessed plants will be discussed separately; und also for the reason that the dead were not decked with them, but placed in the coffin, often under the corpses, so in an invisible place.

    Google Scholar 

  21. All the statistical data was worked out on the basis of materials collected in the archives of PAE PAN in Wrocław.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E.G. informants: P. Makarowicz, born 1905, from Choroszczynka near Biała Podlaska, from Futoma near Rzeszów, from Woźniki near Piotroków Trybunalski and others (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocław).

    Google Scholar 

  23. For example in such villages on Pomeriana such as Pobłocie near Kołobrzeg, Czarna Dąbrówka near Słupsk, Rybna near Wejherowo, Barkoczyn near Kościerzyna and others (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocław).

    Google Scholar 

  24. In the analysed archival material 57 cases of this plant’s use were ascertained. In comparison, myrtle in 625 cases.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Informant J. Kopcinek, born 1928, from Moniatycze near Hrubieszów (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocław).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Informant A. Halicka, born 1901, from Kopisk near Białystok (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kolberg O., Wszystkie D. Chełmskie II, vol. 34, p. 195.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wawrzeniecki M. 1916. Nieco o roślinach, z których wite są wianki święcone na Boże Ciało, Wisła, vol. 29, p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gustawicz B. =(6), p. 287.

    Google Scholar 

  30. For example, such villages as Bobowo near Kwidzyn, Budzieszowice near Goleniów (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Informant J. Grabowski, born 1900, from Oleśnica near Chodzież (archive of PAE PAN In Wroclaw).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Archives of PAE PAN in Wrocław.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Z. Szromba-Rysowa, Zbieranie i uzytkowanie plodów naturalnach (in:) Stare i Nowe Siołkowice part II, Biblioteka Etnografii Polskiej no.12, p. 155 (note 23).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Informatn G. Majorczyk, born 1915 (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Information from, among other places, from the vicinity of Opatów Kielecki, Złotów, Międzychód (archive of PAE PAN in Wroclaw).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Informant M. Zaprt, born 1893, from Zaręcin near Opoczno (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Informant W. Aleksiuk, born 1900, from Topolany near Białystok (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  38. =(38).

    Google Scholar 

  39. The village of Lugojna near Częstochowa (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłraw).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Informant J. Kromólska, born 1904 (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Informant W. Aleksiuk (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Informant Z. Wodarz, born 1893 (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Informant Z. Głowaczewska, born 1907, from Krojanty near Chojnice (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Informant A. Żurkowska, born 1892, from Lelów near Włoszczowa (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Informant P. Beca, born 1929, from Jelonek near Szczecinek (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Informant A. Komar, born 1905, from Szymanów near Wrocław (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Informant W. Bartczak, born 1899, from Wodzierady near Łask (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Informant S. Łysik, from Wieszawa near Tarnowskie Góry (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocław).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Informants: P. Brzeska, born 1890, from Barkoczyn near Kościerzyna, M. Truch, born 1916, from Szyszków near Lubań Slaski and others (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nadmorski D. 1892. Kaszuby i Kociewie. Język, zwyczaje, przesądy, podania, zagadki i pieśnie ludowe w północnej części Prus Zachodnich, Poznań, p. 68-69.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Falkowski J., Pasznycki B. 1935. Na pograniczu łemkowsko-bojkowskim. Zarys etnograficzny, Prace Etnograficzne, no. 2, p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fischer A. 1926. Lud Polski. Podręcznik etnografii Polski, Lwów, p. 123-128.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Gustawicz B. =(6), p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fischer A. =(2), p. 350.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Informant M. Więcko, born 1901 (archive of PAE PAN in Wrocłw).

    Google Scholar 

  56. This property of the poppy seed is quite well known in all the country. In particular, mothers often gave children poppy seed for sleeplessness and nocturnal crying.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1985 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paluch, A. (1985). Plants in Funeral Ceremonies in the Polish Countryside. In: Ethnobotanik—Ethnobotany. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14132-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-14132-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-528-07919-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-14132-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics