Skip to main content

The European Commission: Promoting EU Governance

  • Chapter
Participatory Governance

Abstract

The European Union has evolved as a densely institutionalised site of governance in contemporary Europe. The tentacles of the Union reach into the economies and societies of the member states and its regimes extend beyond its borders. It has evolved in an innovative, pragmatic and experimental manner (Laffan et al. 1999). From the outset, the European Economic Community (EEC) and now the European Union (EU) was engaged in fostering new ways of governing. Its objective was to domesticate interstate relations in Western Europe so as to re-establish a democratic and liberal order by creating an ever deepening and widening common market in the context of widespread welfare. With the deepening and consolidation of market integration in the late 1980s, the EU extended its reach to encompass a single currency, further co-operation in foreign policy and in internal affairs. The EU was and remains a construction that is “highly voluntarist, yet pragmatically piecemeal — and yet vaultingly long-range” (Anderson 1996: 17). Although the EU displays considerable continuity, it has also been characterised by a significant deepening (of markets, societies and of governance regimes) and a qualitative shift in patterns of governance. In the EU, the pragmatic, experimental and incremental often becomes transformational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson P., 1996: The Europe to Come, London Review of Books, 25 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, K./Bulmer, S. 1998: The Governance of the Single European Market, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, J./Dierickx 1998: The Working Groups of the Council of the European Union: Supranational or Intergovernmental Negotiations, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, 36: 3, pp. 289–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucker A., Jorges C., Neyer J., Schlache S., 1996: Social Regulation through Committees, in: Pedler R. H./Schaefer G. (eds.), Shaping European Law and Policy: The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T. 1997: Tensions of European governance: politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European Commission, in: European Journal of Public Policy, 4: 1, pp. 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T./Kirchner, E. (eds.) 2000: Committee governance in the European Union, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciavarini Azzi G, 2000: The Slow March of European Legislation: The Implementation of Directives, in: Neunreither K./Wiener A. (eds.), European Integration after Amsterdam, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cini, M. 1996: The European Commission, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Independent Experts, 1999: First Report of the Committee of Independent Experts on allegations regarding fraud, mismanagement and nepotism in the European Commission, Brussels, 15. 06. 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes D., 1970: Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community, London: George Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Decision 1999/468/EC, Official Journal L 184/199/07/17/ pp. 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cram, L., 1997: Policy Making in the EU, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decode Report, 1999: Designing Tomorrows Commission, 13.07.99, europa.eu.int/ comm/reform/decode/screening-en.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G./Spence, D. (eds.) 1994: The European Commission, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., 1996: Organization and Nationality in the European Commission Services, in: Public Administration, 74, pp. 721–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., 1999: Transcending intergovernmentalism. Identity and role perceptions of national officials in EU decision-making, in: European Journal of Public Policy, 6: 3, pp. 456–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Commission, 2001: Governance in the European Union, De Schoutter O, Lebessis N., and Paterson J. eds, Forward Studies Union, Brussels: EU Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetherstone K, 1994: Jean Monnet and the `Democratic Deficit’ in the European Union, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, 32: 2, pp. 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett G./Weingast B.R., 1993: Ideas, Interests and Institutions: Constructing the European Community’s Internal Market, in: Goldstein J. /Keohane R.O. (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy, New York: Cornell University Press, pp. 173–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haibach, G., 2000: Governance by Committee. The Role of Committees in European Policy-making and Implementation“, EIPASCOPE, no. 2000: 2, pp. 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A./Knill, C./Mingers, S., 1996: Ringing the Changes in Europe, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A., 1999: Policy-Making and Diversity in Europe: Escape from Deadlock, Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., 1999: The Political System of the European Union, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., 1999: Images of Europe: Orientations to European Integration among Senior Officials of the Commission“, in: British Journal of Political Studies, 29, pp. 345–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull R, 1983: Lobbying Brussels: A view from within, in: Mazey S./Ruchardson J. (eds.), Lobbying in the European Community: Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O./Hoffmann, S. (eds.) 1991: The New European Community, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrmans, B., 1996: Do Institutions Make Difference?, in: Governance, 9: 2, pp. 21740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan B., 1997: From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: the challenge facing the European Commission, in: European Journal of Public Policy, 4: 3, pp. 422–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B.,1998: The European Union as a distinctive model of internationalisation, in: European Journal of Public Policy, 5:2, pp. 235–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B./O’Donnell R./Smith M., 1999: Europe’s Experimental Union, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebessis, N./Paterson, J., 1997: Evolution in Governance: What Lessons for the Commission? A First Assessment, EU Commission: Forward Studies Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebessis, N./Paterson, J., 1999: Improving the Effectiveness and Legitimacy of EU Governance, EU Commission: Forward Studies Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lequesne, C., 2000: The European Commission: A Balancing Act between Autonomy and Dependence, in: Neunreither K./Wiener, A. (eds.): European Integration After Amsterdam: Institutional Dynamics and Prospects for Democracy, Oxford, pp. 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow P., 1991: The European Commission, in: Keohane R.O./Hoffmann S. (eds.), The New European Community: Decisionmaking and Institutional Change, Boulder, Colorado: Westview, pp. 85–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone G., 1993: The European Community between social policy and social regulation, Journal of Common Market Studies, 31,2, pp. 153–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majone G., 1996: Regulating Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 284–301.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G./Olsen, J. P., 1995: Democratic Governance, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, L., 1999: Reforming the Commission, EIPASCOPE, No. 1999 /3, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A., 1998: The Choice for Europe, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, N., 1999: The Government and Politics of the European Union, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedler R. H./Schaefer, G. (eds.) 1996: Shaping European Law and Policy: The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelkmans, J. 1997: European Integration: Methods and Economic Analysis, Harlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J./Bomberg, E., 1999: Decision-Making in the European Union, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, P., 1998: The Path to European Integration: A Historical Institutionalist Analysis, in: Stone Sweet, A./Sandholtz, W. (eds.): European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford, pp. 27–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, M. A, 1997: Delegation, Agency and Agenda Setting in the European Community, in: International Organization, 51: 1, pp. 99–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puchala D., 1999: Institutionalism, Intergovernmentalism and European Integration, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, 37: 2, pp. 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (ed.) 1996: European Union: Power and Policy-making, London, pp. 170–186.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G., 1995: Jacques Delors and European Integration, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider V./Dang-Nguyen G./Werle R., 1994: Corporate Actor Networks in European Policy-Making: Harmonizing telecommunications Policy, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, 32: 4, pp. 473–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, D., 2000: Plus ça change, plus c’est law même chose? Attempting to reform the European Commission, in: European Journal of Public Policy, 7: 1, pp. 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandholtz, W./Stone Sweet, A., 1998: European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, H./Wallace, W. (eds.) 2000: Policy Making in the European Union, 4th ed., Oxford, pp. 439–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Jürgen R. Grote Bernard Gbikpi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Laffan, B. (2002). The European Commission: Promoting EU Governance. In: Grote, J.R., Gbikpi, B. (eds) Participatory Governance. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11003-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11003-3_6

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-8100-3237-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-11003-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics